Skip to main content

Are there Universal Environmental Values?

  • Chapter
Environment across Cultures

Part of the book series: Wissenschaftsethik und Technikfolgenbeurteilung ((ETHICSSCI,volume 19))

  • 425 Accesses

Abstract

If one were to judge from the present state of environmental ethics there is more plurality, diversity and heterogeneity to be found in environmental values than in any other field of human valuation. Plurality means that there is great number of separate values which coexist not only in the value systems of cultures and societies, but even of groups and individuals and for which it is doubtful whether they can be reduced to some one overarching monistic principle. Diversity and heterogeneity mean that these values are of different origins and belong to very different traditions, religious and secular, philosophical and popular, and that they are sometimes diametrically opposed to each other in content and direction. Even if they are compatible in theory they easily conflict in practice, calling for rules of priority to determine their relative weights and order of precedence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (1994) Principles of biomedical ethics. 4th ed., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld D (1978) The arrogance of humanism. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson KM, Dragun AK (1996) Contingent valuation and endangered species. Methodological issues and applications. Cheltenham, UK/Brookfields, US

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz E (1985) Organism, community, and the substitution problem. Environmental Ethics 7: 241–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1949) The land ethic. In: Leopold AA Sand County almanac and Sketches here and there. New York, pp 201–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Minteer B, Robert A, Manning E (1999) Pragmatism in environmental ethics: Democracy, pluralism, and the management of nature. Environmental Ethics 21: 191–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton BG (1991) Toward unity among environmentalists. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimlott, DH (1974) The value of diversity. In: Bailey JA, Elder W, McKinney TD (eds) Readings on wildlife conservation. Washington D. C., 31–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1993) Political liberalism. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future Oxford/New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Birnbacher, D. (2003). Are there Universal Environmental Values?. In: Ehlers, E., Gethmann, C.F. (eds) Environment across Cultures. Wissenschaftsethik und Technikfolgenbeurteilung, vol 19. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07058-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07058-1_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07324-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-07058-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics