Risikoabschätzung, Leistungserfassung, Qualitätsmanagement

  • H. Burchardi

Zusammenfassung

Qualitätsmanagement ist ein Begriff aus der industriellen Fertigung, mit dem eine Verbesserung und Rationalisierung von Fertigungsprozessen erreicht werden soll. Wird er auf die Systeme »Krankenhaus« und »Intensivmedizin« angewandt, so muss das Ziel entsprechend angepasst werden. Es könnte jetzt heißen: gute Behandlung und Zufriedenstellung des Patienten.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Kressel S et al. (1981) The sickness impact profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 19: 787–805PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bergner M, Rothman ML (1987) Health status measures: an overview and guide for selection. Ann Rev Public Health 8: 191–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brock WA, Nolan K, Nolan T (1998) Pragmatic science: accelerating the improvement of critical care. New Horiz 6: 61–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burchardi H, Rathgeber J, Schürgers D, Thomas O (1999) Leistungserfassung in der Intensivmedizin. Gesundheitsökon Qualitätsmanag 4: 37–47Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chalfin DB, Cohen IL, Lambrinos J (1995) The economics and cost-effectiveness of critical care medicine. Intensive Care Med 21: 952–961PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cook DJ, Sibbald WJ, Vincent JL, Cerra FB(1996) Evidence based critical care medicine: What is it and what can it do for us? Crit Care Med 24: 334–337Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Curtis JR (1998) The patient-centered outcomes of critical care: What are they and how should they be used? New Horiz 6: 26–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Danis M (1998) Improving end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: What’s to be learned from outcomes research? New Horiz 6: 110–118PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Detsky AS, Naglie IG (1990) A clinician’s guide to cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med 113: 147–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Drummond MF, Stoddard GL, Torrance GW (1988) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford University Press, Oxford New York, pp 39–70.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Edbrooke DL, Stevens VG, Hibbert CL, Mann AJ,Wilson Ai (1997) A new method of accurately identifying costs of individual patients in intensive care: the initial results. Intensive Care Med 23: 645–650Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (1998) Guidelines and recommendations. Intensive Care Med (Special Edition)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL (1993) Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 118: 622–629PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gyldmark M (1995) A review of cost studies on intensive care units: Problems with the cost concept. Crit Care Med 23: 964–972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heyland DK, Kernerman P, Gafni A, Cook DJ (1996) Economic evaluations in the critical care literature: Do they help us to improve the efficiency of our unit? Crit Care Med 24: 1591–1598PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hunt SM, McEwen J (1980) The development of a subjective health indicator. Sociol Health Illness 2: 231–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hurel D, Loirat P, Saulnier F, Nicolas F, Brivet F (1997) Quality of life 6 months after intensive care: results of a prospective multicenter study using a generic health status scale and a satisfaction scale. Intensive Care Med 23: 331–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jegers M, Edbrooke DL, Hibbert CL, Chalfin DB, Burchardi H (2002) Definitions and methods of cost assessment: an intensivist’s guide. Intensive Care Med 28: 680–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kilo CM, Kabcenell A, Berwick DM (1998) Beyond survival: towards continuous improvement in medical care. New Horiz 6: 3–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Knaus WA,Wagner DR Draper EA, et al. (1991) The APACHE Ill prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 100: 1619–1636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kollef MH, Rainey TG, eds. (1998) The role of outcomes research in the intensive care unit setting. New Horizons 6: 1–118Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kommission für Krankenhaushygiene and Infektionsprävention (1995) Anforderungen der Hygiene an die funktionelle and bauliche Gestaltung von Einheiten für Intensivmedizin. Bundesgesundhbl 4: 158–160Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    LeGall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1991) A new simplified acute physiology score ( SAPS II) based on a European/ North American multicenter study. JAMA 270: 2957–2963Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lemeshow S, Teres D, Klar J, Avrunin IS, Gehlbach 5H, Rapoport J (1993) Mortality probability models ( MPM II) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients. JAMA 270: 24782486Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mühlbauer BH, ed. (1997) Krankenhausmanagement im Gesundheitsnetzwerk. Stadtbergen: KognosGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    NoseworthyTW, Konopad E, Shustack A, Johnston R, Grace M (1996) Cost accounting of adult intensive care: Methods and human and capital inputs. Crit Care Med 24: 1168–1172Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Patrick DL, Danis M, Southerland LI, Hong G (1988) Quality of life following intensive care. J Gen Intern Med 3: 218–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rapoport J, Teres D, Lemeshow S, Gehlbach S (1994) A method for assessing the clinical performance and cost-effectiveness of intensive care units: A multicenter inception cohort study. Crit Care Med 22: 1385–1391Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Reis Miranda D, Moreno R, lapichino G (1997) Nine equivalents of nursing manpower use score ( NEMS ). Intensive Care Med 23: 760765Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Reis Miranda D, de Rijk A, Schaufeli W (1996) Simplified therapeutic intervention scoring system: The TISS-28 items–Results from a multicenter study. Crit Care Med 24: 64–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reis Miranda D, Ryan DW, Schaufeli WB, FidlerV (eds) (1998) Organisation and management of intensive care. A prospective study in 12 European countries. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg NewYorkTokio ( Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Vol 29 )Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Russell LB, Gold MR,Siegel JE et al. (1996)The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine. JAMA 276: 1172–1177Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schuster DP (1992) Predicting outcome after ICU admission. The art and science of assessing risk. Chest 102: 1861–1870PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schuster HP (1998) Outcome nach Intensivtherapie. Med Klinik 93: 91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Singer M, Myers S, Hall G, Cohen SL, Armstrong RF (1994) The cost of intensive care: a comparison on one unit between 1988 and 1991. Intensive Care Med 20: 542–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Thijs LG, Members of the Task Force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (1997) Continuous quality improvement in the ICU: general guidelines. Intensive Care Med 23: 125–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Udvarhelyi IS, Colditz GA, Rai A, Epstein AM (1992) Cost-effectiveness and cost benefit analyses in the medical literature. Are the methods being used correctly? Ann Intern Med 116: 238–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yau E, Rohatiner AZS, Lister TA et al. (1991) Long term prognosis and quality of life following intensive care for life-threatening complications of haematological malignancy. Br J Cancer 64: 938–942PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Burchardi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations