Advertisement

Non-Imaging

  • David Hamilton
Chapter

Abstract

The tests for both contamination monitor and exposure meter are similar. They aim to check for obvious physical damage, battery failure and the response to a known activity. Operational checks should check the probe for damage, the state of the battery; and the measured count rate or exposure rate, for a known activity standard source, against expected count rate for contamination and exposure rate for the exposure meter. Routine tests should involve calibration of the scale against known activities and exposure rates respectively; and often have to be undertaken by authorised institutions.

Keywords

Sentinel Node Count Rate Routine Test Exposure Rate Standard Source 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Abbreviations

FWHM

full width at half maximum

MCA

multichannel analyser

PHA

pulse height analyser

PMT

photomultiplier tube

QA

quality assurance

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Britten AJ (1999) A method to evaluate intra-operative gamma probes for sentinel lymph node localisation. Eur J Nucl Med 26:76–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fleming J, Williams N, Skrypniuk J, Thorley P, Rose M, Driver I (2002) Report 85 radioactive sample counting — principles and practice. Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. IAEA (1991) Tecdoc 602 quality control of nuclear medicine instruments. International Atomic Energy Agency, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  4. IEC (1992) International Electrotechnical Commission publication IEC61145 calibration and usage of ionization chamber systems for assay of radionuclides. IEC, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  5. IEC (1994) International Electrotechnical Commission publication IEC 1303 medical electrical equipment: particular methods for declaring the performance of radionuclide calibrators. IEC, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  6. IPSM (1992) Report 65 protocol for establishing and maintaining the calibration of medical radionuclide calibrators and their quality control. Institute of Physical Sciences in Medicine, YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Perkins AC, Britten AJ (1999) Specification and performance of intra-operative gamma probes for sentinel node detection. Nucl Med Commun 20:309–315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Tiourina T, Arends B, Huysmans D, Rutten H, Lemaire B, Muller S (1998) Evaluation of surgical gamma probes for radio-guided sentinel node localisation. Eur J Nucl Med 25:1224–1231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Todd JH, Short MD, Bessent RG, Hawkins LA, Leach KG, Ottewell D, Morgan DW (1980) HPA topic group report 33 an introduction to automatic radioactive sample counters. Hospital Physicists’ Association, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Zanzonico P, Heller S (2000) The intraoperative gamma probe: basic principles and choices available. Semin Nucl Med XXX: 33–48Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Hamilton
    • 1
  1. 1.Riyadh Al Kharj Hospital ProgrammeX990 Military HospitalRiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations