Skip to main content

The Value of Extent-of-Preference Information in Choice-based Conjoint Analysis

  • Chapter
Book cover Conjoint Measurement

Abstract

It is clear that conjoint analysis has had a substantial impact upon research practice (Wittink and Cattin 1989; Wittink, Vriens and Burhenne 1994). Conjoint analysis has evolved, and along with that evolution has been a gradual shift in the types of responses collected, from rankings to ratings to choices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ben-Akiva, M. and Lerman, S. (1985), Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand,Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elrod, T. and Chrzan, K. (1994), Partial Profile Conjoint Analysis: a Choice-Based Approach for handling large Numbers of Attributes, Faculty of Business, University of Alberta, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elrod, T. and Chrzan, K. (1995), Choice-based Approach for large Numbers of attributes, Marketing News, 29, 20–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elrod, T., Louviere, J. and Davey, K.S. (1992), An empirical Comparison of ratings-based and choice-based Conjoint Models, Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 368–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P. (1980), Regression Models for Ordinal Data, with Discussion, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 42, 109–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swait, J. and Louviere, J. (1993), The role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models, Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vriens, M., Oppewal, H. and Wedel, M. (1998), Ratings-based versus Choice-Based Latent Class Conjoint Models–an empirical Comparison, Journal of the Market Research Society, 40, 237–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittink, D.R., and Cattin, P. (1989), Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: An Update, Journal of Marketing, 53, 91–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittink, D.R.,Viens, M. and Burhenne, W. (1994), Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis in Europe: Results and critical Reflections, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11, 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Elrod, T., Chrzan, K. (2000). The Value of Extent-of-Preference Information in Choice-based Conjoint Analysis. In: Conjoint Measurement. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-06395-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-06395-8_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-06397-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-06395-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics