Abstract
Design of experiments is an established technique for product and process improvement that has its origin in the 1920s and the work of Sir Ronald Fisher. Conjoint analysis shares the same theoretical basis as traditional design of experiments, but was originally used within the field of psychology and it was not until the early 1970s that the methodology was introduced into marketing research to form what is called conjoint analysis (Luce and Tukey 1964; Green and Rao 1971; Johnson 1974). Today, conjoint analysis is an established technique for investigating customer preferences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bisgaard, S. (1992), Industrial Use of Statistically Designed Experiments: Case Study References and Some Historical Anecdotes, Quality Engineering, 4, 547–562.
Box, G. E. P. and Behnken, D. W. (1960), Some New Three Level Designs for the Study of Quantitative Variables, Technometrics, 2, 455–475.
Box, G. E. P. and Behnken, D. W. (1961), Corrections, Technometrics, 3, 576–577.
Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G. and Hunter, J. S. (1978), Statistics for Experimenters - An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building,New York.
Box, G. E. P. and Draper, N. R. (1987), Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces,New York.
Box, G. E. P. (1990), George’s Column–Do Interactions Matter? Quality Engineering, 2, 365–369.
Box, G. E. P. and Meyer, R. D. (1993), Finding the Active Factors in Fractionated Screening Experiments, Journal of Quality Technology, 25, 94–105.
Box, G. E. P. and Tyssedal, J. (1996), Projective Properties of Certain Orthogonal Arrays, Biometrika, 83, 950–955.
Daniel, C. (1959), Use of Half-Normal Plots in Interpreting Factorial Two-Level Experiments, Technometrics, 1, 311–341.
Daniel, C. (1976), Application of Statistics to Industrial Experimentation,New York.
Draper, N. R. and Smith, H. (1981), Applied Regression Analysis,New York.
Finney, D. J. (1945), The Fractional Replication of Factorial Arrangements, Annals of Eugenics, 12, 291–301.
Fisher, R. A. (1935), The Design of Experiments,Edinburgh.
Green, P. and Rao, V. (1971), Conjoint Measurement for Quantifying Judgemental Data, Journal ofMarketing Research, 1, 61–68.
Green, P. (1984), Hybrid Models for Conjoint Analysis: An Expository Review, Journal of Marketing Research, 21, 155–169.
Green, P. and Srinivasan, V. (1978), Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook, Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 103123.
Green, E. P. and Srinivasan, V. (1990), Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice, Journal of Marketing, 17, 3–19.
Hagerty, M. R. (1986), The Cost of Simplifying Preference Models, Marketing Science, 5, 298–319.
Hamada, M. and Wu, C. F. J. (1992), Analysis of Designed Experiments with Complex Aliasing, Journal of Quality Technology, 24, 130137.
Hynén, A. (1996), Screening for Main and Interaction Effects with Plackett and Burman’s 12 Run Design, (Submitted) (A preprint is available as RQTM Research Report No. 1, Division of Quality Technology and Management, Linköping University, Sweden. ).
Johnson, R. (1974), Trade-off Analysis of Consumer Values, Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 121–127.
Kackar, R. N. and Tsui, K. L. (1990), Interaction Graphs: Graphical Aids for Planning Experiments, Journal of Quality Technology, 22, 1–14.
Luce, D. and Tukey, J. (1964), Simultaneous Conjoint Measurement: A New Type of Fundamental Measurement, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 1–27.
Myers, R. H. and Montgomery, C. M. (1995), Response Surface Methodology, New York.
Plackett, R. L. and Burman, J. P. (1946), The Design of Optimum Multi-factorial Experiments, Biometrika, 33, 305–325.
Sun, D. X. and Wu, C. F. J. (1994), Interaction Graphs for Three-Level Fractional Factorial Designs, Journal of Quality Technology, 26, 297–307.
Wittink, R. D. and Catlin, P. (1989), Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: An Update, Journal of Marketing, 53, 91–96.
Wittink, D. R., Vriens, M. and Burhenne, W. (1994), Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis in Europe: Results and Critical Reflections, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11, 41–52.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blomkvist, O., Ekdahl, F., Gustafsson, A. (2000). Non-geometric Plackett-Burman Designs in Conjoint Analysis. In: Conjoint Measurement. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-06395-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-06395-8_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-06397-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-06395-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive