Skip to main content

Are Efficient Markets Really Efficient?: Can Financial Econometric Tests Convince Machine-Learning People?

  • Chapter
Computational Intelligence in Economics and Finance

Part of the book series: Advanced Information Processing ((AIP))

Abstract

Using Quinlan’s Cubist, this paper examines whether there is a consistent, interpretation of the efficient market hypothesis between financial econometrics and machine learning. In particular, we ask whether machine learning can be useful only in the case when the market is not efficient. Based on the forecasting performance of Cubist in our artificial returns, some evidences seems to support this consistent interpretation. However, there are a few cases whereby Cubist can beat the random walk even though the series is independent. As a result, we do not consider that the evidence is strong enough to convince one to give up his reliance on machine learning even though the efficient market hypothesis is sustained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen, S.-H. Kuo, T.-W. (1999): Towards an Agent-Based Foundation of Financial Econometrics: An Approach Based on Genetic-Programming Artificial Markets. In Banzhaf, W., Daida, J., Eiben, A. F., Garzon, M. H., Honavar, V., Jakiela, M., Smith, R. E. (Eds.), CEC CO-99: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, Vol. 2..Morgan Kaufmann, 966–973

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, S.-H., Tan, C.-W. (1999): Brief Signals in the Real and Artificial Stock Markets: An Approach Based on the Complexity Function. In: Arabrria, II. R.. (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial intelligence, Vol. II. Computer Science Research, Education, and Application Press, 423–429

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, S.-H., Yeh, C.-H. (1999): On the Consequence of “Following the Herd”: Evidence from the Artificial Stock Market. In: Arabrria, H. R. (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. II. Computer Science Research, Education, and Application Press, 388–394

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, S. -Il., Yeh, C. -H. (2001): Evolving Traders and the Business School with Genetic Programming: A New Architecture of the Agent-Based Artificial Stock Market..Iournal of Economic; Dynamics and Control. 25, 363–393

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, S.H., Wang, H.-S., Zhang, B.-T. (1999): Forecasting High-Frequency Financial Time Series with Evolutionary Neural Trees: The Case of Hang-Seng Stock Index. In: Arabrria; H. R. (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. II. Computer Science Research, Education, and Application Press, 437–443

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, S.-H., Yeh, C.-H. (2002): On the Emergent Properties of Artificial Stock Markets: The Efficient Market Hypothesis and the Rational Expectations Hypothesis. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 99 (1), 217–239

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, S.-H., Liao, C.-C. (2002): ‘Testing for Granger Causality in the Stock-Price Volume Relation: A Perspective from the Agent-Based Model of Stock Markets. Information Sciences, forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grossman, S. J., Stiglitz, J. (1980): On the Impossibility of lnformationally Efficiency Markets. American Economic Review, 70, 393–108

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rissanen, J. (1986): Stochastic Complexity and Modeling. Annals of Statistics, 14 (3), 1080–1100

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chen, SH., Kuo, TW. (2004). Are Efficient Markets Really Efficient?: Can Financial Econometric Tests Convince Machine-Learning People?. In: Chen, SH., Wang, P.P. (eds) Computational Intelligence in Economics and Finance. Advanced Information Processing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-06373-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-06373-6_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07902-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-06373-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics