FDTD Analysis of Beam-Wave Interaction

  • Toshiyuki Shiozawa
Part of the Advanced Texts in Physics book series (ADTP)

Abstract

In the theoretical treatment of beam-wave interactions, the fluid model or the single-particle model has been used for representing the relativistic electron beam, as described in the foregoing chapters. However, it is very difficult to clarify the details of complicated beam-wave interactions, which are generally nonlinear in essence, only with the aid of purely theoretical approaches based upon either of these models. In fact, with the rapid development of digital computers in recent years, computer simulation has become a powerful tool for the research of nonlinear physical phenomena in various electron beam devices. In this chapter, we describe a typical branch of computer simulation, what is called particle simulation [8.1–8.3], which treats resonant interactions between a collection of charged particles and electromagnetic waves in plasmas or electron beams. In this method, the Maxwell equations and the relativistic equation of motion are discretized in space and time for numerical analysis of electromagnetic wave propagation and particle motion. Thus the interaction of a collection of charged particles and electromagnetic waves is temporally followed with the aid of the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method [8.4, 8.51.

Keywords

Permeability Eter Tempo 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 8.1
    R.W. Hockney, J.W. Eastwood: Computer Simulation Using Particles ( McGraw-Hill, New York 1981 )Google Scholar
  2. 8.2
    J.M. Dawson, A.T. Lin: “Particle Simulations”, in Basic Plasma Physics ed. by A.A. Galeev, R.N. Sudan (Elsevier, Amsterdam 1984 )Google Scholar
  3. 8.3
    C.K. Birdsall, A.B. Langdon: Plasma Physics via Computer Simulation ( McGraw-Hill, New York 1985 )Google Scholar
  4. 8.4
    K.S. Yee: “Numerical Solution of Initial Boundary-Value Problems Involving Maxwell’s Equations in Isotropic Media”. IEEE Trans. Antennas & Propagat. 14, 302 (1966)ADSMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 8.5
    A. Taflove: Computational Electrodynamics —The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method ( Artech House, Massachusetts 1995 )MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 8.6
    T.D. Pointon, J.S. De Groot: “Particle Simulation of Plasma and Dielectric Cerenkov Masers”, Phys. Fluids 31, 908 (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 8.7
    L. Schächter: “Cerenkov Traveling-Wave Tube with a Spatially Varying Dielectric Coefficient”, Phys. Rev. A 43, 3785 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.8
    K. Horinouchi, M. Sanda, H. Takahashi, T. Shiozawa: Analysis of a Cherenkov Laser via Particle Simulation“ (in Japanese), IEICE Trans. J-78-C-I, 1 (1995)Google Scholar
  9. 8.9
    T. Shiozawa, T. Yoshitake: “Efficiency Enhancement in a Cherenkov Laser Loaded with a Kerr-like Medium”, IEEE J. Quant. Electron. QE-31, 539 (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 8.10
    T. Shiozawa, H. Takahashi, Y. Kimura: “Nonlinear Saturation and Efficiecy Enhancement in a Cherenkov Laser Using a Dielectric Grating”. IEEE J. Quant. Electron. QE 32, 2037 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 8.11
    A. Hirata, S. Hirosaka. T. Shiozawa: “Effectiveness and Limitation of the Periodic Boundary Approximation in the Analysis of Single-Pass Electron Beam Devices”, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 30. 1292 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toshiyuki Shiozawa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Communication EngineeringOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations