Skip to main content

The Prepared Mind: the Role of Representational Change in Chance Discovery

  • Chapter
Chance Discovery

Part of the book series: Advanced Information Processing ((AIP))

Summary

Analogical reminding in humans and machines is a great source for chance discoveries because analogical reminding can produce representational change and thereby produce insights. Here, we present a new kind of representational change associated with analogical reminding called packing. We derived the algorithm in part from human data we have on packing. Here, we explain packing and its role in analogy making, and then present a computer model of packing in a micro-domain. We conclude that packing is likely to be used in human chance discoveries, and is needed if our machines are to make their own chance discoveries.

Chance favors only the prepared mind.” — Louis Pasteur

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dietrich E (2000) “Analogy and conceptual change, or you can’t step into the same mind twice. In E. Dietrich and A. Markman (eds.), Cognitive Dynamics: Conceptual and representational change in humans and machines, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 265–294

    Google Scholar 

  2. Falkenhainer B, Forbus K, Gentner D (1989) The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples, Artificial Intelligence, 41 (1): 1–63

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Forbus K, Gentner D, Law K (1995) MAC/FAC: A model of similarity-based retrieval. Cognitive Science, 19: 141–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gentner D, Brem S, Ferguson R, Markman A, Levidow B, Wolff P, Forbus K (1997) Analogical reasoning and conceptual change: A case study of Johannes Kepler. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6 (1): 3–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gentner D (1983) Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy, Cognitive Science 7: 155–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gentner D (1989) The mechanisms of analogical learning, In S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (eds.) Similarity and analogical reasoning, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 199–241.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gentner D, Markman AB (1997) Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52 (1): 45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gentner D, Wolff P (2000) Metaphor and knowledge change,“ In Dietrich E, Markman A (eds), Cognitive Dynamics: Conceptual and representational change in humans and machines, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 295–342

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hummel JE, Holyoak KJ (1997) Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104 (3): 427–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kotovsky L, Gentner D(1996) Comparison and categorization in the development of relational similarity, Child Development, 67: 2797–2822.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Markman AB (1997) Constraints on analogical inference. Cognitive Science, 21 (4): 373–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Markman AB (1999) Knowledge Representation. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  13. Markman AB, Gentner D (1993) Structural alignment during similarity Comparisons. Memory and Cognition, 24 (2): 235–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Markman AB, Gentner D (1996) Commonalities and differences, Memory and Cognition, 24: 235–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Palmer SE (1978) Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation. In Rosch E, Lloyd BB (eds) Cognition and Categorization, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 259–302

    Google Scholar 

  16. Poincare H (1908/1952) Science and Method,Dover Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stilwell CH, Markman AB, Dietrich E (2001). The Fate of Irrelevant Information in Analogy, Unpublished Ms.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thagard P, Holyoak KJ, Nelson G, Gochfeld D (1990) Analogical retrieval by constraint satisfaction. Artificial Intelligence, 46, 259–310

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Wiser M, Carey S (1983) When heat and temperature were one. In Gentner D, Stevens AL (eds) Mental Models (pp. 267–298 ), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dietrich, E., Markman, A.B., Stilwell, C.H., Winkley, M. (2003). The Prepared Mind: the Role of Representational Change in Chance Discovery. In: Ohsawa, Y., McBurney, P. (eds) Chance Discovery. Advanced Information Processing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-06230-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-06230-2_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05609-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-06230-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics