Advertisement

The Drag Paradox: Measurements of Flight Performance and Body Drag in Flying Birds

  • Jeremy M. V. Rayner
  • Will J. Maybury
Conference paper

Abstract

Central to understanding the achievements of migrating birds and the constraints within which they operate is the ability to estimate the flight performance that a migrant can maintain for sustained periods. To date, there have been relatively few direct measurements of avian flight energetics, and because of the complexity of the techniques involved, few of the available data have been subject to appropriate controls. Attention has therefore focussed on the use of analytical models based on aerodynamic theory to estimate measures of flight performance such as flight speed, power and range, and which can be used to predict flight behaviour under a range of circumstances. Application of such models has been very effective in developing an understanding of, for instance, the factors that determine the choice of flight speed, flight strategies in response to varying winds and/or topography and feeding strategies prior to or during extended migration (Alerstam and Lind-ström 1990; Berthold 2001; Alerstam 2002). The most common currencies used in formulating these questions are energy and time, both of which may have been the target of significant selective pressures on migrating birds. Accordingly, the most affective aerodynamic models are those that are able to make realistic predictions of flight speed and power in a range of different birds.

Keywords

Wind Tunnel Drag Coefficient Mechanical Power Flight Speed Flight Performance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alerstam T, Lindström A (1990) Optimal bird migration: the relative importance of time, energy, and safety. In: Gwinner E (ed) Bird migration. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 331–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger M (1985) Sauerstoffverbrauch von Kolibris (Colibri coruscans und C. thalassinus) beim Horizontalflug. In: Nachtigall W (ed) Biona report 3, Bird flight–Vogelflug. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, pp 307–314Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein MH (1976) Ventilation and respiratory evaporation in the flying crow, Corvus ossifragus Resp Physiol 26: 371–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernstein MH, Thomas SP, Schmidt-Nielsen K (1973) Power input during flight in the fish crow, Corvus ossifragus. J Exp Biol 58: 401–410Google Scholar
  5. Berthold P (2001) Bird migration: a general survey. 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Bishop CM (1999) The maximum oxygen consumption and aerobic scope of birds and mammals: getting to the heart of the matter. Proc R Soc Lond B 266: 2275–2281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bishop CM, Butler PJ (1995) Physiological modeling of oxygen consumption in birds during flight. J Exp Biol 198: 2153–2163PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Butler PJ, Woakes AJ (2001) Seasonal hypothermia in a large migrating bird: saving energy for fat deposition?) Exp Biol 204: 1361–1367Google Scholar
  9. Butler PJ, Woakes AJ, Bevan RM, Stephenson R (2000) Heart rate and rate of oxygen consumption during flight of the barnacle goose, Branta leucopsis. Comp Biochem Physiol A 126: 379–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carpenter RE (1985) Flight physiology of flying foxes, Pteropus poliocephalus. J Exp Biol 114: 619–647Google Scholar
  11. Carpenter RE (1986) Flight physiology of intermediate-sized fruit bats (Pteropodidae). J Exp Biol 120: 79–103Google Scholar
  12. Gesser R, Wedekind F, Kockler R, Nachtigall W (1998a) Aerodynamische Untersuchungen an naturnahen Starenmodellen: 1. Grundlegende Ergebnisse. In: Blickhan R, Wisser A, Nachtigall W (eds) Biona report. 13, Motion Systems. Gustav Fischer, Jena, pp 229–230Google Scholar
  13. Gesser R, Wedekind F, Kockler R, Nachtigall W (1998b) Aerodynamische Untersuchungen an naturnahen Starenmodellen: 2. Flügel-Rumpf Interferenzen. In: Blickhan R, Wisser A, Nachtigall W (eds) Biona report 13, Motion Systems. Gustav Fischer, Jena, pp 257–258Google Scholar
  14. Hedenström A, Alerstam T (1995) Optimal flight speed of birds. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 348: 471–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hedenström A, Liechti F (2001) Field estimates of body drag coefficient on the basis of dives in passerine birds. J Exp Biol 204: 1167–1175PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hertel H (1963) Struktur, Form, Bewegung. Krauskopf, Mainz. [Transl Structure, Form, Movement). Rheinhold, New York, 1966Google Scholar
  17. Hudson DM, Bernstein MH (1983) Gas exchange and energy cost of flight in the white-necked raven, Corvus cryptoleucos. J Exp Biol 103: 121–130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kvist A, Lindström Â, Green M, Piersma T, Visser GH (2001) Carrying large fuel loads during sustained bird flight is cheaper than expected. Nature 413: 730–732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maybury WJ (2001) The aerodynamics of bird bodies. PhD thesis, University of Bristol, BristolGoogle Scholar
  20. Maybury WJ, Rayner JMV (2001) The avian tail reduces body parasite drag by controlling flow separation and vortex shedding. Proc R Soc Lond B 268: 1405–1410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maybury WJ, Rayner JMV, Couldrick LB (2001) Lift generation by the avian tail. Proc R Soc Lond B 268: 1443–1448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pennycuick CJ (1968) Power requirements for horizontal flight in the pigeon, Columba livia. J Exp Biol 49: 527–555Google Scholar
  23. Pennycuick CJ (1969) The mechanics of bird migration. Ibis 111: 525–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pennycuick CJ (1975) Mechanics of flight. In: Farner DS, King JR, Parkes KC (eds) Avian biology, vol V. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–73Google Scholar
  25. Pennycuick CJ (1978) Fifteen testable predictions about bird fligt. Oikos 30: 165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pennycuick CJ (1989) Bird flight performance: a practical calculation manual. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Pennycuick CJ, Heine CE, Kirkpatrick SJ, Fuller MR (1992) The profile drag of a hawk’s wing, measured by wake sampling in a wind tunnel. J Exp Biol 165: 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pennycuick CJ, Klaassen M, Kvist A, I,indström A (1996) Wingbeat frequency and the body drag anomaly: wind-tunnel observations on a thrush nightingale (Luscinia luscinia) and a teal (Anas crecca). J Exp Biol 199: 2757–2765PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pennycuick CJ, Obrecht HH, Fuller MR (1988) Empirical estimates of body drag in large waterfowl and raptors. J Exp Biol 135: 253–264Google Scholar
  30. Prior NC (1984) Flight energetics and migration performance in swans. PhD Thesis, University of Bristol, BristolGoogle Scholar
  31. Rayner JMV (1979) A new approach to animal flight mechanics. J Exp Biol 80:17–54 Rayner JMV (1988) Form and function in avian flight. Curr Ornithol 5: 1–77Google Scholar
  32. Rayner JMV (1990) The mechanics of flight and bird migration performance. In: Gwinner E (ed) Bird migration. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 283–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rayner JMV (1993) On aerodynamics and the energetics of vertebrate flapping flight. In: Cheer AY, van Dam CP (eds) Fluid dynamics in biology. Contemporary mathematics 141. American Mathematical Society, Providence, pp 351–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rayner JMV (1994a) Avian flight energetics in relation to flight speed and body size: discrepancies between theory and measurement. J Ornithol 135: 302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rayner JMV (1994b) Aerodynamic corrections for the flight of birds and bats in wind tunnels. J Zool 234: 537–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rayner JMV (1995) Flight mechanics and constraints on flight performance. Isr J Zool 41: 321–342Google Scholar
  37. Rayner JMV (1999) Estimating power curves for flying vertebrates. J Exp Biol 202:3449–3461 Rayner JMV (2001) Mathematical modelling of the avian power curve. Math Meths Appl Sci 24: 1485–1514Google Scholar
  38. Rayner JMV, Ward S (1999) On the power curves of flying birds. In: Adams NJ, Slotow RH (eds )Google Scholar
  39. Proc 22nd Int Ornithol Congr, Durban, BirdLife South Africa, Johannesburg, pp 1786–1809Google Scholar
  40. Rayner JMV, Viscardi PW, Ward S, Speakman JR (2001) Aerodynamics and energetics of intermittent flight in birds. Am Zool 41: 188–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rayner JMV, Maybury WJ, Couldrick LB (2002) Aerodynamic control by the avian tail. Am Zool (in press)Google Scholar
  42. Rothe H-J, Biesel W, Nachtigall W (1987) Pigeon flight in a wind tunnel. II. Gas exchange and power requirements. J Comp Physiol B 157: 99–109Google Scholar
  43. Thomas SP (1975) Metabolism during flight in two species of bats, Phyllostomus hastatus and Pteropus gouldii. J Exp Biol 63: 273–293PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Torre-Bueno JR, Larochelle J (1978) The metabolic cost of flight in unrestrained birds. J Exp Biol 75: 223–229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Tucker VA (1968) Respiratory exchange and evaporative water loss in the flying budgerigar. J Exp Biol 48: 67–87Google Scholar
  46. Tucker VA (1972) Metabolism during flight in the laughing gull, Larus atricilla. Am J Physiol 222: 237–245PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Tucker VA (1973) Bird metabolism during flight: evaluation of a theory. J Exp Biol 58: 689–709Google Scholar
  48. Tucker VA (1990) Body drag, feather drag and interference drag of the mounting strut in a peregrine falcon, Falco peregrinus. J Exp Biol 149: 449–468Google Scholar
  49. Tucker VA (2000) Gliding flight: drag and torque of a hawk and a falcon with straight and turned heads, and a lower value for the parasite drag coefficient. J Exp Biol 203: 3733–3744PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Ward S, Möller U, Rayner JMV, Jackson DM, Nachtigall W, Speakman JR (1998) Power requirement for starling flight in a wind tunnel. Biol Consery Fauna 102: 335–339Google Scholar
  51. Ward S, Rayner JMV, Möller U, Jackson DM, Nachtigall W, Speakman JR (1999) Heat transfer from starlings, Sturnus vulgaris, during flight. J Exp Biol 202: 1589–1602PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Ward S, Möller U, Rayner JMV, Jackson DM, Bilo D, Nachtigall W, Speakman JR (2001) Metabolic power, mechanical power and efficiency during wind tunnel flight by European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris. J Exp Biol 204: 3311–3322PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Welham CVJ (1994) Flight speeds of migrating birds: a test of maximum range speed predictions from three aerodynamic equations. Behav Ecol 5: 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Withers PC (1981) An aerodynamic analysis of bird wings as fixed aerofoils. J Exp Biol 90: 143–162Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeremy M. V. Rayner
    • 1
  • Will J. Maybury
    • 2
  1. 1.School of BiologyUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations