Magnetic Navigation by an Avian Migrant?

  • Janette H. Fischer
  • Ursula Munro
  • John B. Phillips
Conference paper

Abstract

Spatial variation in the geomagnetic field provides a potential source of information about geographic position (map information) that has been suggested to play a role in animal navigation (Yeagley 1947; Gould 1980; Moore 1980; Walcott 1980). To use a magnetic map, an animal would have to learn the alignment, and perhaps the steepness, of the gradient of at least one magnetic component within its normal range of movement. It would then have to extrapolate this gradient or gradients beyond its area of familiarity. A comparison of the value of a magnetic field component at an unfamiliar site with the home value of that component would provide information about the animal’s position along the gradient (Phillips 1996; Wallraff 1991). Nonparallel gradients of two different components (either or both of which could be magnetic) could then provide the basis for bicoordinate position-fixing (true navigation; Griffin 1952). Spatial gradients in the geomagnetic field are, however, extremely weak. The average rate of change in magnetic total intensity is only 3–5 nT km−1, ranging from values of approximately 25 000 nT near the magnetic equator to 65 000 nT at the magnetic poles. The average rate of change in magnetic inclination is only about 0.01° km−1, ranging from 0° at the magnetic equator to 90° at the magnetic poles. The accuracy of map information derived from the geomagnetic field depends in part upon the sensitivity of the underlying magneto-reception mechanism. For example, a map with a resolution of 100 km would require total intensity measurements accurate to approximately 1% (500 nT), whereas a resolution of 1 km would require measurements accurate to approximately 0.01% (5 nT). The use of a magnetic map, therefore, may require an extremely high level of sensitivity to variation in the intensity and/or inclination of a static magnetic field and, thus, may help to establish the lower limits of such sensitivity in a biological system (Kirschvink and Gould 1981; Semm and Beason 1990; Walcott 1991). The possibility of a magnetic map or geographic position sense, therefore, raises fundamental questions not only about bicoordinate navigation, but also about the biophysical mechanism(s) that mediate sensitivity to the geomagnetic field and about the limits of sensory perception.

Keywords

Migration Europe Cage Titration Magnetite 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Batschelet E (1981) Circular statistics in biology. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck W, Wiltschko W (1988) Magnetic factors control the migratory direction of pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca Pallas). Acta Congr Int Ornithol 19: 1955–1962Google Scholar
  3. Berthold P (1990) Spatiotemporal programs and genetics of orientation. Experientia 46: 363–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blakers M, Davies SJJF, Reilly, PN (1984) The Atlas of Australian birds. Royal Australian Ornithologists Union and Melbourne University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  5. Dornfeldt K (1991) Pigeon homing in relation to geomagnetic, gravitational, topographical, and meteorological conditions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28: 107–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Emlen ST, Emlen JT (1966) A technique for recording migratory orientation of captive birds. Auk 84: 361–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fischer JH, Freake MJ, Borland SC, Phillips JB (2001) Evidence for the use of a magnetic map by an amphibian. Anim Behav 62: 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gould JL (1980) The case for magnetic sensitivity in birds and bees (such as it is). Am Sci 68: 256–267Google Scholar
  9. Griffin DR (1952) Bird navigation. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 27: 359–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Keeton WT, Larkin TS, Windsor DM (1974) Normal fluctuations in the Earth’s magnetic field influence pigeon orientation. J Comp Physiol 95: 95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kirschvink JL (1992) Uniform magnetic fields and double-wrapped coil systems: improved techniques for the design of bioelectromagnetic experiments. Bioelectromagnetics 13: 401–411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kirschvink JL, Gould JL (1981) Biogenic magnetite as a basis for magnetic field detection in animals. Biosystems 13: 181–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kirschvink JL, Ricci JD, Nesson MH, Kirschvink SJ (1993) Magnetite-based magnetoreceptors in animals: structural, behavioral, and biophysical studies. Technical Report TR-102008. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Palo Alto, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  14. Kowalski U, Wiltschko R, Fuller E (1988) Normal fluctuations of the geomagnetic field may affect initial orientation in pigeons. J Comp Physiol A 163: 593–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kramer G (1953) Wird die Sonnenhöhe bei der Heimfindeorientierung verwendet? J Ornithol 94: 201–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Larkin TS, Keeton WT (1976) Bar magnets mask the effect of normal magnetic disturbance on pigeon orientation. J Comp Physiol 110: 227–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lednor AJ (1982) Magnetic navigation in pigeons: possibilities and problems. In: Papi F, Wall-raff HG (eds) Avian navigation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lohmann KJ, Lohmann CM (1994) Detection of magnetic inclination angle by sea turtles: a pos-sible mechanism for determining latitude. J Exp Biol 194: 23–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lohmann KJ, Lohmann CM (1996) Detection of magnetic field intensity by sea turtles. Nature 380: 59–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Merritt R, Purcell C, Stoink G (1983) Uniform magnetic field produced by three, four, and five square coils. Rev Sci Instrum 54: 879–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moore BR (1980) Is the homing pigeon’s map magnetic? Nature 285: 69–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Munro U, Munro JA, Phillips JB, Wiltschko R, Wiltschko W (1997a) Evidence for a magnetite-based navigational `map’ in birds. Naturwissenschaften 84: 26–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Munro U, Munro JA, Phillips JB, Wiltschko W (1997b) Effect of wavelength of light and pulse magnetization on different magnetoreception systems in a migratory bird. Aust J Zool 45: 189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Perdeck AC (1958) Two types of orientation in migrating Sturnus vulgaris and Fringilla coelebs as revealed by displacement experiments. Ardea 46: 1–37Google Scholar
  25. Phillips JB (1996) Magnetic navigation. J Theor Biol 180: 309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Phillips JB, Deutschlander ME (1997) In: Stevens RG, Wilson BW, Anderson LE (eds) The melatonin hypothesis: breast cancer and the use of electric power. Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio, pp 111–172Google Scholar
  27. Phillips JB, Deutschlander ME, Munro U, Fischer JK (2003) Age and experience determine the response of migratory silvereyes, Zosterops 1. lateralis, to simulated magnetic displacements (in prep.)Google Scholar
  28. Phillips JB, Freake MJ, Fischer JH, Borland SC (2002) Behavioral titration of a magnetic map coordinate. J Comp Physiol 188: 157–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rodda GH (1984) The orientation and navigation of juvenile alligators: evidence of magnetic sensitivity. J Comp Physiol 154: 649–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Semm P, Beason RC (1990) Responses to small magnetic variations by the trigeminal system of the bobolink. Brain Res Bull 25: 735–740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Walcott C (1980) Magnetic orientation in homing pigeons. IEEE Trans Magnet 16: 1008–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Walcott C (1991) Magnetic maps in pigeons. In: Berthold P (ed) Orientation in birds. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 38–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wallraff HG (1991) Conceptual approaches to avian navigational systems. In: Berthold P (ed) Orientation in birds. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 128–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wiltschko W (1972) The influence of magnetic total intensity and inclination on directions chosen by migrating European robins. In: Galler SR, Schmidt-Koenig K, Jacobs GL, Belleville RE (eds) Animal orientation and navigation. NASA SP-262, Washington DC, pp 569–578Google Scholar
  35. Wiltschko W, Munro U, Ford H, Wiltschko R (1993) Red light disrupts magnetic orientation of migratory birds. Nature 364: 525–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wiltschko W, Munro U, Beason RC, Ford H, Wiltschko R (1994) A magnetic pulse leads to a temporary deflection in the orientation of migratory birds. Experientia 50: 697–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wiltschko W, Munro U, Ford H, Wiltschko R (1998) Effect of magnetic pulse on the orientation of silvereyes, Zosterops 1. lateralis, during spring migration. J Exp Biol 201: 3257–3261PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Yeagley HL (1947) A preliminary study of a physical basis of bird navigation. J Appl Phys 18: 1035–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janette H. Fischer
    • 1
  • Ursula Munro
    • 2
  • John B. Phillips
    • 3
  1. 1.Dept. of BiologyIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.Dept. of Environmental Sciences, Gore Hill CampusUniversity of TechnologySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Biology DeptVirginia Polytechnic Institute & State UniversityBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations