Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Power Systems ((POWSYS))

Abstract

This chapter proposes a framework for controlling power systems involving two types of control actions: first swing and damping controls. The problem is addressed with control agents having each a specific objective. The agents concur to provide system-wide control. A Wide-Area Measurement System provides the information necessary at each agent using its own representation of the system. First swing controls act as special protection systems in multiple time scales and channels. Damping controls rely on low order dynamic multiple input single output MISO controllers between selected input and output channels at each control agent. The design objectives of damping controls are to mimic the relevant dynamics of linear state feedback. Structural constraints are accounted by a design based on the best measurements available at each agent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Trudel G, Bernard S, Scott G (1999) Hydro-Québec’s defense plan against extreme contingencies. IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, vol 14, pp 958–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Taylor CW, Lefebvre S (1991) HVDC controls for system dynamic performance. IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, vol 6, pp 743–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kundur P (1994) Power system stability and control. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  4. CIGRE Task Force 38.01.07 (1996) Control of power system oscillations. CIGRE Technical Brochure.

    Google Scholar 

  5. IntelliTEAM ® Overview of Operations. EnergyLine Systems, Alameda, CA, http://www.energvline.com

  6. Huang JA, Valette A, Beaudoin M, Morison K, Moshref A, Provencher M, Sun J (2002) An intelligent system for advanced dynamic security assessment. International Conference on Power System Technology, vol 1, pp 220–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wildberger AM (1997) Complex adaptive systems : concepts and power industry applications. IEEE Trans. on Control Systems, December, pp 77–88

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hauer JF (1991) Application of Prony analysis to the determination of modal content and equivalent models for measured power system response. IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, vol 6, pp 1062–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanchez-Gasca JJ, Chow JH (1999) Performance comparison of three identification methods for the analysis of electromechanical oscillations. IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, vol 14, pp 995–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kamwa I, Trudel G, Gerin-Lajoie L (1996) Low-Order black-box models for control system design in large power systems. IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, vol 11, pp 303–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yusof SB, Rogers GJ, Alden RTH (1993) Slow coherency based network partitioning including load buses. IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, vol 8, pp 1375–1382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lefebvre S (2000) Dynamic output compensation between selected channels in power systems. Part 1: The framework. Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol 22, pp 155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lefebvre S (2000) Dynamic output compensation between selected channels in power Systems. Part 2: Applications. Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol 22, pp 165–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kamwa I, Grondin R, Hebert Y (2001) Wide-area measurement based stabilizing control of large power systems — A decentralized/hierarchical approach. IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, vol 16, no 1

    Google Scholar 

  15. Park YM, Moon UC, Lee KY (1996) A self-organizing power system stabilizer using fuzzy auto-regressive moving average (FARMA) model. IEEE Trans. on Energy Conversion, vol 11, pp 442–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Park YM, Choi MS, Lee KY (1996) A neural network-based power system stabilizer using power flow characteristics. IEEE Trans. on Energy Conversion, vol 11, pp 435–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cui X, Shin KG (1991) Intelligent coordination of multiple systems with neural networks. IEEE Trans. Man and Cybernetics, vol 21, pp 1488–1497

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Ning W, Shuqing W (1997) Neuro-intelligent coordination control for a unit power plant. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Processing Systems, vol 1, pp 750–753

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lefebvre, S. (2003). Dynamic Output Compensation between Selected Channels in Power Systems. In: Autonomous Systems and Intelligent Agents in Power System Control and Operation. Power Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05955-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05955-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07290-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-05955-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics