Summary
In a game with rational expectations, individuals simultaneously refine their information with the information revealed by the strategies of other individuals. At a Nash equilibrium of a game with rational expectations, the information of individuals is essentially symmetric: the same profile of strategies is also an equilibrium of a game with symmetric information; and strategies are common knowledge. If each player has a veto act, which yields a minimum payoff that no other profile of strategies attains, then the veto profile is the only Nash equilibrium, and it is is an equilibrium with rational expectations and essentially symmetric information; which accounts for the impossibility of speculation.
We wish to thank Pierpaolo Battigalli, Françoise Forges, Franco Donzelli, Leonidas Koutsougeras, Aldo Rustichini, Rajiv Vohra and Nicholas Yannelis for their comments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aumann, R. J.: Agreeing to disagree. The Annals of Statistics 4, 1236–1239 (1976)
Debreu, G.: A social equilibrium existence theorem. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 38, 886–893 (1952)
Debreu, G.: Topological methods in cardinal utility. In: Arrow, K. J., Karlin, S., Suppes, P. (eds.) Mathematical methods in the social sciences, pp. 16–26. Stanford: Stanford University Press 1959
Dubey, P., Geanakoplos, J., Shubik, M.: The revelation of information in strategic market games. Journal of Mathematical Economics 16, 105–137 (1987)
Forges, F., Minelli, E.: A property of Nash equilibria in repeated games with incomplete information. Games and Economic Behavior 18, 159–175 (1997a)
Forges, F., Minelli, E.: Self-fulfilling mechanisms and rational expectations. Journal of Economic Theory 75, 338–406 (1979b)
Geanakoplos, J. D., Polemarchakis, H. M.: We can’t disagree forever. Journal of Economic Theory 28, 192–200(1982)
Geanakoplos, J. D.: Common knowledge. Handbook of game theory, Vol. 2, pp. 1427–1496. Amsterdam: North Holland 1995
Harsanyi, J.: Games with incomplete information played by Bayesian players, I—III. Management Science 14, 159–182, 320–334, 486–502 (1967–68)
Holmström, B., Myerson, R.: Efficient and durable decision rules with incomplete information. Econo-metrica 51, 1799–1819(1983)
Kalai, E.: Private information in large games. Northwestern University, DP 1312 (2000)
Kreps, D.: A note on fulfilled expectations equilibria. Journal of Economic Theory 14, 32–43 (1977)
Milgrom, P., Stokey N. L.: Information, trade and common knowledge. Journal of Economic Theory 26, 17–27 (1982)
Radner, R.: Competitive equilibrium under uncertainty. Econometrica 36, 31–58 (1968)
Radner, R.: Rational expectations equilibrium: generic existence and the information revealed by prices. Econometrica 47, 655–678 (1979)
Savage, L. J.: The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley 1954
Tirole, J.: On the possibility of speculation under rational expectations. Econometrica 50, 1163–1181 (1982)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Minelli, E., Polemarchakis, H. (2004). Information at equilibrium. In: Aliprantis, C.D., Arrow, K.J., Hammond, P., Kubler, F., Wu, HM., Yannelis, N.C. (eds) Assets, Beliefs, and Equilibria in Economic Dynamics. Studies in Economic Theory, vol 18. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05858-9_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05858-9_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05663-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-05858-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive