Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Die Auswertung von Mehrfeldertafeln

  • Chapter
Angewandte Statistik

  • 71 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Vierfeldertafeln haben wir im Abschnitt 46 kennengelernt. Wir befassen uns hier fast nur mit den einfachsten Mehrfeldertafeln: Zweiwegtafeln (a) des Typs k·2 mit k≧3 und (b) des Typs r·c mit r≧3 und c≧3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur zu den einzelnen Kapiteln

  • Altham, Patricia M.E.: The measurement of association of rows and columns for an r · s contingency table. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 32 (1970), 63–73.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, P.: Tests for linear trends in proportions and frequencies. Biometrics 11 (1955), 375–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, D. J.: A test of homogeneity for ordered alternatives. I and II. Biometrika 46 (1959), 36–48 and 328-335 [vgl. auch 63 (1976), 177-183, 647-654; J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 23 (1961), 239-281, J. Amer. Statist Assoc. 67 (1972), 55-63 sowie Biometrics 30 (1974), 589-597].

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, B.M.: Tests for marginal symmetry in contingency tables. Metrika 19 (1972), 23–26.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, B.M., and Hsu, P.: Sampling studies on a test against trend in binomial data. Metrika 5 (1962), 96–104.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, B.M., and E. Nakamura: (1) Tables for testing significance in a 2 × 3 contingency table. Techno-metrics 5 (1963), 501–511.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, B.M., and E. Nakamura: (2) The power function of the exact test for the 2 × 3 contingency table. Technometrics 6 (1964), 439–458.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, Dorothy, Leyton, M., and Maloney, C.J.: Exact contingency table calculations. Ninth Conf. Design Exper. in Army Research Development and Testing (1965), (N. I. H., Bethesda Md.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhapkar, V. P.: On the analysis of contingency tables with a quantitative response. Biometrics 24 (1968), 329–338.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • —, and Koch, G.G.: (1) Hypotheses of “no interaction” in multidimensional contingency tables. Technometrics 10 (1968), 107–123.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bhapkar, V. P.: (2) On the hypotheses of “no interaction” in contingency tables. Biometrics 24 (1968), 567–594.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Yvonne M.M.: Full contingency tables, logits, and split contingency tables. Biometrics 25 (1969), 383–399 (vgl. auch 119-128).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Fienberg, S. E., and Holland, P. W.: Discrete Multivariate Analysis. Theory and Practice. (MIT Press; pp. 557) Cambridge, Mass. 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, A. H.: A test for symmetry in contingency tables. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 43 (1948), 572–574 [vgl. auch Biometrics 27 (1971), 1074-1078].

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, J.L., and Shapiro, M.M.: A general equation and technique for the exact partitioning of chi-square contingency tables. Psychol. Bull. 66 (1966), 252–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellan jr., N.J.: On the partitioning of contingency tables. Psychol. Bull. 64 (1965), 330–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caussinus, H.: Contribution à l’analyse statistique des tableaux de corrélation. Ann. Fac. Sci. Univ. Toulouse, Math., 4. Ser., 29 (1965), 77–183.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W.G.: (1) Some methods of strengthening the common χ2 tests. Biometrics 10 (1954), 417–451.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W.G.: (2) Analyse des classifications d’ordre. Revue Statistique Appliquée 14, 2 (1966), 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, K.: FM — Ein Maß für die Qualität einer Vorhersage aufgrund einer mehrklassigen Variablen in einer k · 2-Felder-Tafel. Z. exp. angew. Psychol. 17 (1970), 592–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairfield Smith, H.: On comparing contingency tables. The Philippine Statistician 6 (1957), 71–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg, S.E.: (1) The analysis of multidimensional contingency tables. Ecology 51 (1970), 419–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg, S.E.: (2) An iterative procedure for estimation in contingency tables. Ann. Math. Statist. 41 (1970), 907–917 [vgl. auch Psychometrika 36 (1971), 349-367 und Biometrics 28 (1972), 177-202].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, K. R.: Simultaneous test procedures for multiple comparisons on categorical data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 61 (1966), 1080–1096.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gart, J.J.: Alternative analyses of contingency tables. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 28 (1966), 164–179 [vgl. auch Biometrika 59 (1972), 309-316].

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.A.: (1) On methods for comparing contingency tables. J. Roy. Statist. Soc, Ser. A 126 (1963), 94–108.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.A.: (2) Simple methods for analyzing three-factor interaction in contingency tables. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 59 (1964), 319–352.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.A.: (3) On partitioning χ2 and detecting partial association in three-way contingency tables. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 31 (1969), 486–498.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.A.: (4) The multivariate analysis of qualitative data: interactions among multiple classifications. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 65 (1970), 226–256. [vgl. auch Technometrics 13 (1971), 33-61, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 68 (1973), 165-175 und Biometrika 68 (1981), 347-355].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.A. and Kruskal, W.H.: Measures of association for cross classifications, IV. Simplification of asymptotic variances. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 67 (1972), 415–421 [vgl. auch 74 (1979), 537-552 sowie (A. Agresti) 71 (1976), 49-55].

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Grizzle, J. E., Starmer, C. F., and Koch, G. G.: Analysis of categorical data by linear models. Biometrics 25 (1969), 489–504 [ vgl. auch 26 (1970), 860; 28 (1972), 137-156, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 67 (1972), 55-63 und Method. Inform. Med. 12 (1973), 123-128].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hamdan, M.A.: Optimum choice of classes for contingency tables. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 63 (1968), 291–297 [vgl. auch Psychometrika 36 (1971), 253-259].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hettmansperger, T. P., and McKean, J.W.: On testing for significant change in c × c tables. Commun. Statist. 2 (1973), 551–560.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, C.T., Ku, H.H., and Kullback, S.: Symmetry and marginal homogeneity of an r · r contingency table. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 64 (1969), 1323–1341.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, C.T., and Kullback, S.: Minimum discrimination information estimation. Biometrics 24 (1968), 707–713 [vgl. auch 27 (1971), 175-182 und Biometrika 55 (1968), 179-188].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kastenbaum, M. A.: (1) A note on the additive partitioning of chi-square in contingency tables. Biometrics 16 (1960), 416–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kastenbaum, M. A.: (2) Analysis of categorical data: some well-known analogues and some new concepts. Commun. Statist. 3 (1974), 401–417.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid, W.M.: The combination of 2 × m contingency tables. Biometrics 18 (1962), 224–228.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ku, H.H.: A note on contingency tables involving zero frequencies and the 21 test. Technometrics 5 (1963), 398–400.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ku, H.H., and Kullback, S.: Interaction in multidimensional contingency tables: an information theoretic approach. J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stds. 72B (1968), 159–199.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ku, H. H., Varner, R. N., and Kullback, S.: On the analysis of multidimensional contingency tables. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 66 (1971), 55–64 [vgl. auch 70 (1975), 503-523 u. 624 + 625].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kullback, S.: Information Theory and Statistics. (Wiley, pp. 395) New York 1959 [vgl. J. Adam, H. Enke u. G. Enderlein: Biometrische Zeitschr. 14 (1972), 305-323; 15 (1973), 53-78, 17 (1975), 513-523].

    Google Scholar 

  • Kullback, S., Kupperman, M., and Ku, H.H.: (1) An application of information theory to the analysis of contingency tables, with a table of 2n ln n, n = 1(1)10,000. J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stds. B 66 (1962), 217–243.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kullback, S., Kupperman, M., and Ku, H.H.: Tests for contingency tables and Markov chains. Technometrics 4 (1962), 573–608.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kullback, S., and Leibler, R. A.: On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Statist. 22 (1951), 79–86.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, H.O.: The Chi-Squared Distribution. (Wiley, pp.356), New York 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C., and Felsenstein, J.: The robustness of homogeneity tests in 2 × n tables. Biometrics 21 (1965), 19–33.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mantel, N.: Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom; extensions of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 58 (1963), 690–700 [vgl. auch Biometrics 29 (1973), 479-486].

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mantel, N., and Haenszel, W.: Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J. Natl. Cancer Institute 22 (1959), 719–748 [vgl. auch Amer. J. Epidemiology 112 (1980), 129-134, Biometrics 36 (1980), 381-399 und W. J. Youden: Cancer 3 (1950), 32-35].

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, R.C., and Chapman, D.G.: The power of Chi-square tests for contingency tables. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 61 (1966), 965–975 [vgl. auch Amer. Statist. 31 (1977), 83-85].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mosteller, F.: Association and estimation in contingency tables. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 63 (1968), 1–28 [vgl. auch J. R. Landis and G. G. Koch, Statistica Neerlandica 29 (1975), 101-123, 151-161].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nass, C.A.G.: The χ2 test for small expectations in contingency tables with special reference to accidents and absenteeism. Biometrika 46 (1959), 365–385.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Neider, J. A.: Log. linear models for contingency tables. Applied Statistics 23 (1974), 323–329 [vgl. 25 (1976), 37-46 u. The Statistician 25 (1976), 51-58].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odoroff, C.L.: A comparison of minimum logit chi-square estimation and maximum likelihood estimation in 2 × 2 × 2 and 3 × 2 × 2 contingency tables: tests for interaction. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 65 (1970), 1617–1631 [vgl. auch 69 (1974), 164-168].

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlik, K.: Der maximale Kontingenzkoeffizient im Falle nichtquadratischer Kontingenztafeln. Metrika 2 (1959), 150–166.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Plackett, R. L.: The Analysis of Categorical Data. (Griffin [GSMC No. 35]; pp. 153) London 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, T. A.: Significance tests for multiple comparison of proportions, variances and other statistics. Psychological Bull. 57 (1960), 318–328 [siehe M. Horn, Biom. J. 23 (1981), 343-355].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, L.: Statistische Methoden. 5. neubearb. Aufl. (Springer, 124 S.) Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, J.P.: Defining and testing hypotheses in multidimensional contingency tables. Psychol. Bull. 79 (1973), 127–141.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Winckler, K.: Anwendung des χ2-Tests auf endliche Gesamtheiten. Ifo-Studien 10 (1964), 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, B.: The log likelihood ratio test (the G-Test). Methods and tables for tests of heterogeneity in contingency tables. Ann. Human Genetics 21 (1957), 397–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, F.: The analysis of contingency tables with groupings based on quantitative characters. Biometrika 35 (1948), 176–181 [vgl. auch 39 (1952), 274-289].

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Lothar Sachs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sachs, L. (1984). Die Auswertung von Mehrfeldertafeln. In: Angewandte Statistik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05748-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05748-3_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-12800-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-05748-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation