Home and office blood pressures. Clinical observations and hemodynamic mechanisms

  • Fetnat M. Fouad
  • Carolyn Nemec
  • Robert C. Tarazi
  • Stephen C. Textor
  • Emmanuel L. Bravo
Conference paper


Wide fluctuations in arterial pressure have long been recognized as a feature in many hypertensive patients and have consistently been a major difficulty in decisions for treatment and understanding of pathophysiology. It is only in the past decade that more precise estimates of the degree of diurnal variations could be obtained by ambulatory 24-hour recordings of blood pressure from intra-arterial catheterization (1) or noninvasive methods (2–3). In the absence of these methods, it is still possible to avoid the pitfalls associated with sole dependence on office blood pressure levels by asking the patients to measure their own pressures at home or at work. This was the method used for over forty years in our center; it had many advantages that could outweigh its limited number of daily observations. Blood pressure could be followed over long periods of time and not be limited to one day; the patients developed a greater sense of participating in their follow-up and came to recognize their pressure fluctuations as a physiolgoical variable analagous to changes in daily weight.


Target Organ Damage Home Blood Pressure Office Blood Pressure Home Systolic Blood Pressure Left Ventricular Muscle Mass 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Raftery EB, Millar-Craig MW: Information derived from direct 24-hour recordings. In: Clement D, ed; Blood pressure variability. Lancaster, MTP Press 67 (1979).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Messerli FH, Glade LB, Ventura HO, Dreslinski GR, Suarez DH, MacPhee AA, Aristimuno GG, Cole FE, Frohlich ED: Diurnal variations of cardiac rhythm, arterial pressure, and urinary catecholamines in borderline and established essential hypertension. Am Heart J 104: 109–114 (1982).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weber MA, Drayer FIM, Wyle FA, Brewer DD: A representative value for whole-day BP monitoring. JAMA 248: 1626–1628 (1982).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nemec CF, Tarazi RC, Textor SC, Mujais SK, Fouad FM, Bravo EL: An evaluation of discrepancy between clinic and home blood pressures in hypertensive patients. (Submitted)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Page IH: Hypertension — the fledgling of modern medical practice. Postgrad Med 61: 203–206 (1977).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fouad FM, Tarazi RC, Dustan HP, Bravo EL: Hemodynamics of essential hypertension in young subjects. Am Heart J 96: 646–654 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tarazi RC, Dustan HP: Beta adrenergic blockade in hypertension: Practical and theoretical implications and long-term hemodynamic variations. Amer J Cardiol 29: 633–640 (1972).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nicotero JA, Beamer V, Montsis SE, et al: Effects of propranolol on pressor responses to noxious stimuli in hypertension. Amer J Cardiol 22: 657–666 (1968).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ulrych M: Changes of general haemodynamics during stressful mental arithmetic and non-stressing quiet conversation and modification of the latter by beta-adrenergic blockade. Clin Sci 36: 453–461 (1969).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Andren L, Hansson, Bjorkman M, Jonsson A: Noise as a contributory factor in the development of elevated arterial pressure. A study of the mechanisms by which noise may raise blood pressure in man. Acta Med Scand 207: 493–498 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kannel WB: Role of blood pressure in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Progr Cardiovasc Dis 17: 5 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sokolow M, Werdegar D, Kain HK, Hinman AT: Relationship between level of blood pressure measured casually and by portable recorders and severity of complications in essential hypertension. Circulation 34: 279–298 (1966).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ibrahim MM, Tarazi RC, Dustan HP, Gifford RW Jr: Electrocardiogram in evaluation of resistance to antihypertensive therapy. Arch Intern Med 137: 1125–1129 (1977).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Drayer JIM, Weber MA, DeYoung JL: BP as a determinant of cardiac left ventricular muscle mass. Arch Intern Med 143: 90–92 (1983).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rowlands DB, Ireland MA, Stallard TJ, Glover DR, McLeay RAB, Watson RDS: Assessment of left ventricular mass and its response to antihypertensive treatment. Lancet (Feb): 467–470 (1982).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fetnat M. Fouad
    • 1
  • Carolyn Nemec
    • 1
  • Robert C. Tarazi
    • 1
  • Stephen C. Textor
    • 1
  • Emmanuel L. Bravo
    • 1
  1. 1.Research DivisionCleveland Clinic FoundationUSA

Personalised recommendations