Allergologie pp 101-145 | Cite as

Diagnostik

  • Martin Röcken
  • Werner Heppt
  • Jürgen Seidenberg
  • Thomas Rothe
  • Bodo Niggemann
  • Ueli Müller
  • Kurt Blaser
  • Hans F. Merk
  • Harald Renz

Zusammenfassung

Zur Bestätigung einer anamnestisch vermuteten Allergie wurden Provokationstests an den Schockorganen der allergischen Entzündung entwickelt. Prinzipiell können sie an Haut, Nase, Bronchien, Gastrointestinaltrakt und Auge durchgeführt werden. Unter all den Verfahren besitzen die In-vivo-Testungen an der Haut die größte Bedeutung. Sie sind gut standardisiert, einfach durchführbar und aufgrund der großen Erfahrung auch relativ sicher zu interpretieren.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Adams RM (1995) Occupational skin disease. Grune & Stratton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandmann HJ, Fregert S (1982) Epicutantestung, 2. Aufl. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braun-Falco O, Plewig G, Wolff HH (1996) Dermatologie und Venerologie, 4. Aufl. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York TokyoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Czarnetzki BM, Grabbe J (1993) Urtikaria, 2. Aufl. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York TokyoGoogle Scholar
  5. Darsow U, Vieluf D, Ring J (1996) The atopy patch test: an increased rate of reactivity in patients who have an air-exposed pattern of atopic eczema. Br J Dermatol 135: 182–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hölzle E, Rowold J, Peper S et al. (1989) Die belichtete Epikutantestung. Allergologie 12: 13–20Google Scholar
  7. Patterson R, Grammer LG, Greenberger PA, Zeiss CR (1993) Allergic diseases. Diagnosis and management, 4th edn. Lippincott, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  8. Ring J, Braun-Falco O (1987) Allergie-Diät: Verfahren zur Diagnostik und Therapie von Nahrungsmittel-Allergien und Pseudo-Allergien. Hautarzt 38: 198–205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, Benezra C (1992) Textbook of contact dermatitis, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York TokyoGoogle Scholar
  10. Schulz KH, Fuchs T (1990) Der Epikutantest. In: Fuchs E, Schulz KH (Hrsg) Manuale Allergologicum, Bd IV, 4. Dustri, Deisenhofen, S 1–24Google Scholar
  11. Wennersten G, Thume P, Jansen CT et al. (1986) Photocontact dermatitis: current status with emphasis on allergic contact photosensitivity (CPS) occurrence, allergens, and practical phototesting. Semin Dermatol 5: 277–289Google Scholar
  12. Yuninger JW (1997) Diagnostic testing. In: Kaplan AP (ed) Allergy, 2nd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 326–333Google Scholar

Weiterführende Literatur

  1. Arbeitskreis bronchiale und nasale Provokationstests der deutschen Gesellschaft für Allergie-und Immunitätsforschung (1990) Richtlinien für die Durchführung von nasalen Provokationstests mit Allergenen bei Erkrankungen der oberen Luftwege. Allergologie 13: 53–56Google Scholar
  2. BenEzra D, Bonini S, Carreras B et al. (1994) Ocular immunology and inflammation. Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of conjunctivitis, vol 2 Suppl. Aeolus PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonini S, Bucci MG, Berruto A et al. (1990) Allergen dose response and late symptoms in a human model of ocular allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 86 (6): 869–876PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Donshik PC (1988) Allergic conjunctivitis. Int Ophthalmol Clin 28 (4): 324–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dreborg S (1985) Conjunctival provocation test. Allergy 40 Suppl 4: 66–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gronemeyer U (1994) Der konjunktivale Provokationstest. In: Fuchs E, Schulz KH (Hrsg) Manuale allergologicum. Dustri, Deisenhofen, 6: 1–6Google Scholar
  7. Müller C, Dreborg S (1985) The precision of the conjunctival provocation test. Allergy 40 Suppl 4: 68–69Google Scholar
  8. Okuda M (1977) Basic study of nasal provocation test. Arch Otorhinolaryngol Suppl 214: 241–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Schlenter WW (1990) Die nasale Provokationstestung. Allergologie 13: 44–52Google Scholar
  10. Togias A (1996) The role of environmental allergens in rhinitis. In: Busse WW, Holgate ST (eds) Asthma and rhinitis. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 1011–1020Google Scholar

Weiterführende Literatur

  1. European Respiratory Society (1993) Standardized lung function testing. Eur Respir J 6 (Suppl. 16)Google Scholar
  2. Magnussen H, Bonnet R (1989) Lungenfunktionsuntersuchungen. In: Fabel H (Hrsg) Pneumologie. Urban & Schwarzenberg, München Wien Baltimore, S 48–85Google Scholar
  3. Niggemann B (1992) Lungenfunktionsdiagnostik in der Praxis. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 140: 45–57Google Scholar
  4. Niggemann B, Riedl-Seifert R, Seidenberg J (1995) Rahmenempfehlungen zu Lungenfunktionsuntersuchungen im Kindesalter. Der Kinderarzt 26: 1154–1160Google Scholar
  5. Kuppel G (1991) Manual of pulmonary function testing, 5th edn. Mosby, St. Louis Baltimore BostonGoogle Scholar
  6. Seidenberg J, Pauly E, Hardt H von der (1991) Lungenfunktionsgeräte für die pädiatrische Praxis. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 139: 307–309PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Stocks J, Sly PD, Tepper RS, Morgan WJ (eds) (1996) Infant respiratory function testing. Wiley-Liss, New York Chichester Brisbane Toronto SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  8. Working Group „Paediatrics“ SEPCR (1989) Standardization of lung function tests in paediatrics. Eur Resp J 2 (Suppl 4)Google Scholar
  9. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Exogen-Allergische Alveolitis der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allergie- und Immunitätsforschung und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pneumologie (1998) Empfehlungen zur inhalativen Provokationstestung bei exogen-allegischer Alveolitis. Pneumologie (in Druck)Google Scholar
  10. Empfehlungen zur Diagnosestellung einer exogen-allergischen Alveolitits der Arbeitsgruppe Exogen-Allergische Alveolitis (199o) Allergologie 13: 111–112Google Scholar
  11. Frolund L (1996) Bronchial allergen challenge. Methodological studies. Allergy 51 (Suppl 29): 11–41Google Scholar
  12. Anderson JA (1994) Milestones marking the knowledge of adverse reactions to food in the decade of the 1980s. Ann Allergy 72: 143–154PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bahna SL (1994) Blind food challenge testing with wide-open eyes. Ann Allergy 72: 235–238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bock SA, Atkins FM (199o) Patterns of food hypersensitivity during sixteen years of double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges. J Pediatr 117: 561–567Google Scholar
  15. Bock SA, Sampson HA, Atkins FM, Zeiger RS, Lehrer S, Sachs M, Bush RK, Metcalfe DD (1988) Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) as an official procedure: A Manual. J Allergy Clin Immunol 82: 986–997PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davidovits M, Levy Y, Avramowitz T, Eisenstein B (1993) Calcium-deficiency rickets in a four-year-old boy with milk allergy. J Pediatr 122: 249–251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grüttner R (1992) Mangelzustände bei Fehlernährung durch alternative Kost im Säuglings-und Kleinkindesalter. Dt Ärztebl 89: 462–466Google Scholar
  18. Kanaka C, Schütz B, Zuppinger KA (1992) Risks of alternative nutrition in infancy: a case report of severe iodine and carnitine deficiency. Eur J Pediatr 151: 786–788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. May CD (1985) Are confusion and controversy about food hyper-sensitivity really necessary? J Allergy Clin Immunol 75: 329–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Metcalfe DD, Sampson HA (199o) Workshop on experimental methodology for clinical studies of adverse reactions to foods and food additives. J Allergy Clin Immunol 86: 421–442Google Scholar
  21. Niggemann B, Ehnert B, Wahn U (1991) Diagnostik der Nahrungsmittelallergie im Kindesalter–was ist gesichert? Allergologie 14: 208–213Google Scholar
  22. Niggemann B, Wahn U, Sampson HA (1994) Proposals for standardization of oral food challenge tests in infants and children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 5: 11–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Niggemann B, Beyer K, Pohl C, Wahn U (1996) Diagnostisches Vorgehen bei Verdacht auf Nahrungsmittelallergie im Kindesalter. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 144: 65–73Google Scholar
  24. Sampson HA (1988) Immunologically mediated food allergy: the importance of food challenge procedures. Ann Allergy 60: 262–269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sampson HA, Albergo R (1984) Comparison of results of skin tests, RAST, and double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges in children with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 74: 26–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Alter SC, Schwartz LB (1989) Tryptase: An indicator of mast cell-mediated allergic reactions. In: Spector SL (ed) Provocative challenge procedures: background and methodology. Futura Publishing, Mount Kisco/NY, pp 167–183Google Scholar
  27. Bischoff SC, Grabowsky J, Manns MP (1997) Quantification of inflammatory mediators in stool samples of patients with inflammatory bowel disorders and controls (in Druck)Google Scholar
  28. Bock SA (1997) In vivo diagnosis: skin testing and oral challenge procedures. In: Metcalfe DD, Sampson HA, Simon RA (eds) Food allergy, 2nd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 151–166Google Scholar
  29. Bruijnzeel-Koomen C, Ortolani C, Aas K, Bindslev-Jensen C, Björkstén B, Monoret-Vautrin D, Wüthrich B (1995) Adverse reactions to food. Allergy 50: 623–635PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jewett D, Gein G, Greenberg M (1990) A double-blind study of symptom provocation to determine food sensitivity. N Engl J Med 323: 429–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matsson P, Ahlstedt S, Venge P, Thorell J (1991) Clinical impact of the monitoring of allergic inflammation. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Niggemann B, Beyer K, Wahn U (1994) The role of eosinophils and eosinophil cationic protein in monitoring oral challenge tests in children with food-sensitive atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 94: 963–971PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pradal M, Vervloet D (1997) Drug reactions. In: Kay AB (ed) Allergy. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 1671–1692Google Scholar
  34. Sabbah A, Sainte-Laudy M (1996) Flow cytometry applied to the analysis of lymphocyte and basophil activation. ACI Int 8: 116–119Google Scholar
  35. Sampson HA (1997) Food allergy. In: Kay AB (ed) Allergy. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 1517–1549Google Scholar
  36. Sampson HA, Jolie PL (1984) Increased plasma histamine concentrations after food challenges in children with atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med 311: 372–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schwartz LB, Yunginger JW, Miller J, Bokhari R, Dull D (1989) Time course of appearance and disappearance of human mast cell tryptase in the circulation after anaphylaxis. J Clin Invest 83: 1551–1555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Arsdel PP (1986) Drug reactions: allergy and near-allergy. Ann Allergy 57: 305–311Google Scholar
  39. Wüthrich B (1986) Nahrungsmittelallergien. Der Internist 27: 362–371PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Blaauw PJ, Smithuis LOMJ (1985) The evaluation of the common diagnostic methods of hypersensitivity for bee and yellow jacket venom by means of an in-hospital sting. J Allergy Clin Immunol 75: 556–562PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Forster J, Hauck P, Urbanek R (1991) Sequential bee sting challenge (SBSC) before hyposensitization therapy (HST) in children with bee venom allergy (BVA). J Allergy Clin Immunol 87: 238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Linden P-WG van der, Hack CE, Struyvenberg A, Zwan JC van der (1994) Insect-sting challenge in 324 subjects with a previous anaphylactic reaction: current criteria for insect-venom hypersensitivity do not predict the occurrence and the severity of anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 94: 151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ruëff F, Przybilla B, Müller U, Mosbech H (1996) The sting challenge test in Hymenoptera venom allergy. Allergy 51: 216–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Bousquet J, Chanez P, Chanal I, Michel F-B (1990) Comparison between RAST und Pharmacia CAP system: A new automated specific IgE assay. J Allergy Clin Immunol 85: 1039–1043PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Chapman MD, Smith AM, Slunt JB, Vailes LD, Arruda LK (1995) Immunochemical and molecular methods for defining and measuring indoor allergens: in dust and air. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 6 (Suppl 7): 8–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. De Weck AL, Stadler BM, Urwyler A, Wehner HU, Bühlmann RP (1939) Cellular allergen stimulation test (CAST): A new dimension in allergy diagnostics. Allergy Clin Immunol News 5: 9–14Google Scholar
  47. Liappis N, Schlebusch H, Niesen M (1992) Referenzbereiche für die IgE-Konzentration im Serum von Kindern. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 140: 300–302PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Peterson CGB, Enander I, Nystryd J, Anderson AS, Nilsson L, Venge P (1991) Radioimmunoassay of human eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) by an improved method. Establishment of normal levels in serum and turnover in vivo. Clin Exp Allergy 21: 561–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pichler WJ (1993) Diagnostische Möglichkeiten bei Medikamentenallergien. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 123: 1183–1192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Subcommittee on,Occupational Allergy’ of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (1992) Guidelines for the diagnosis of occupational asthma. Clin Exp Allergy 22: 103–108Google Scholar
  51. Wide L, Bennich H, Johansson SGO (1967) Diagnosis of allergy by an in-vitro test for allergen antibodies. Lancet 2: 1105–1107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Röcken
  • Werner Heppt
  • Jürgen Seidenberg
  • Thomas Rothe
  • Bodo Niggemann
  • Ueli Müller
  • Kurt Blaser
  • Hans F. Merk
  • Harald Renz

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations