Abstract
There are two sets of agents: buyers B and sellers S. Each type of agent is allowed to trade with as many agents on the opposite side it wishes. Agents’ decision process is determined by a market price system p, where p=(p(s, b), (s, b) ∈ S × B. Namely, a seller s solves the task max B ⊂ B [p(s, B)-c(s, B)] where c(s, B) is the cost incurred by seller s when he contracts with a set B of buyers. A buyer b, similarly, will solve for max s⊂s [u(S, b) - p(S,b)], where u(S, b) is the utility of buyer b after contracting with S sellers.
We examine the existence of competitive equilibrium in this market. We show that equilibria exist in those markets for which there are appropriate combinations of substitutes and complements among the goods on sale. In particular, equilibria exist if all the goods on sale are pure substitutes, or if they are all pure complements. We also establish results about the structure of the sets of equilibrium prices and allocations. We show that the substitution and complementarity requirements are intimately related to the discrete convexity (or concavity) requirements imposed on the corresponding cost and utility functions of the market agents.
The authors wish to thank two anonymous referees for their remarks.
The financial support of RFBR grant # 00–15–98873 is gratefully acknowledged.
The financial support # 8210–053488 of the Swiss National Science Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bevia, C., M. Quinzii, and J. Silva (1999). Buying several indivisible goods. Mathematical Social Sciences37, 1–23.
Crawford, V. P. and E. Knoer (1981). Job matching with heterogeneous firms and workers. Econometrica49, 437–450.
Danilov, V. and G. Koshevoy (1998). Discrete convexity and unimodularity I. Technical report, Forthcoming in Advances in Mathematics.
Danilov, V., G. A. Koshevoy, and A. Sotskov (1994). Equilibrium in a market of intellectual goods. Mathematical Social Sciences27, 133–144.
Danilov, V. I., G. Koshevoy, and K. Murota (2001). Equilibria in economies with indivisible goods and money. Mathematical Social Sciences41, 251–273.
Danilov, V. I., G. A. Koshevoy, and C. Lang (2001). Gross substitution, discrete convexity and submodularity. Discrete and Applied Mathematics, (to appear)
Frank, A. (1982). An algorithm for submodular functions on graphs. Annals of Discrete Mathematics16, 97–120.
Frank, A. and E. Tardös (1988). Generalized polymatroids and submodular flows. Mathematical Programming42, 489–563.
Gale, D. and L. Shapley (1962). College admissions and the stability of marriage. American Mathematical Monthly69, 9–15.
Gui, F. and E. Stacchetti (1999). Walrasian equilibrium with gross substitutes. Journal of Economic Theory87, 95–124.
Kaneko, M. (1982). The central assignment game and the assignment markets. Journal of Mathematical Economics10, 1483–1504.
Kelso, A. and V. Crawford (1982). Job matching, coalition formation and gross substitutes. Econometrica50, 1483–1504.
Koopmans, T. and M. J. Beckmann (1957). Assignment problems and the location of economic activities. Econometrica25, 53–76.
Lovász, L. (1983). Submodular functions and convexity. In M. G. A. Bachem and B. Korte (Eds.), Mathematical Programming: The State of Art, pp. 235–257. Springer-Verlag.
Murota, K. (1996). Convexity and Steinitz’s exchange property. Advances in Mathematics124,272–311.
Quinzii, M. (1984). Core and competitive equilibria with indivisibilities. International Journal of Game Theory13, 41–60.
Roth, A. (1984). Stability and polarization of interests in job matching. Econometrica52, 47–57.
Shapley, L. S. (1971). Cores of convex games. International Journal of Game Theory1, 11–26.
Shapley, L. S. and M. Shubik (1972). The assignment game I: the core. International Journal of Game Theory1, 111–130.
Topkis, D. M. (1978). Minimizing a submodular function on a lattice. Operations Research26, 305–321.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Danilov, V.I., Koshevoy, G.A., Lang, C. (2003). Substitutes, Complements, and Equilibrium in Two-Sided Market Models. In: Sertel, M.R., Koray, S. (eds) Advances in Economic Design. Studies in Economic Design. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05611-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05611-0_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05541-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-05611-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive