Skip to main content

Learning Similarities for Informally Defined Objects

  • Chapter
Adaptivity and Learning
  • 251 Accesses

Abstract

Learning is considered as an essential aspect of intelligence. It takes usually place in some context where one learns from an environment. There are various forms of learning: How to learn and what to learn. Here we are concerned with learning of informal concepts. Informal concepts occur in many forms: Heuristics, personal judgements, utterances about taste etc. Such concepts provide to major difficulties:

  1. 1)

    Informal concepts do not have a precise definition and often not a definition at all.

  2. 2)

    Informal concepts are subjective and their interpretation depends on persons or groups of persons.

  3. 3)

    Not the concepts themselves play the major role but rather the way one uses them. The use is manifold but mainly connected with decisions for or against a behavior or an action.

  4. 4)

    The concepts and the use of the concepts have to be learned.

  5. 5)

    There is no sharp measurement of what the meaning of ‘successful learning’ is: The learning success is again something imprecise. As a consequence, the approximation character of the learning process is central.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bergmann, R. (2001): Experience Management, Manuscript Kaiserslautern 2001 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burkhard, K-D., Richter, M.M. (2000): On the Notion of Similarity in Case Based Reasoning and Fuzzy Theory. In: Soft Computing in Case Based Reasoning (ed. Sankar K Pal et al), Springer Verlag 2000, p. 29–46

    Google Scholar 

  3. Globig, C., Jantke, K, Lange, S. Sakakibara, Y., (1997): Krechel, D. On case-based learn-ability of languages. New Generation Computing 15 (1), p. 57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hardy, G.H., Littlewood„ J.E., Polya, G. (1934): Inequalities. Cambridge Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lackoff, G. (1987): Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. The University of Chicago Press 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lenz, M., Bartsch-Spörl, B., Burkhard, H.-D., Wess, S. (eds.) (1998): Case-Based Reasoning Technology. Springer LNAI 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pape,Ch., Krechel, D., Richter, M:M. (1999): Wissensbasierte Bilddeutung in der Medizin am Beispiel des CYCLOPS-Systems. In: Angewandte Mathematik, insbesondere Informatik (ed. Patrick Horster) Vieweg-Verlag, ISBN 3-528-05720-3, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pawlak, Z. (1984): Rough Classification. Intern.J. of Man-Machine Studies 20 (1984), p. 469–483.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Pfleger, T. (2000): Private communication.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Richter, M.M., Schmitt, S. (2001): Kundenmodellierung und Dialogführung: Eine Herausforderung fü eCRM. In: Electronic Customer Relationship Management, ed. Eggert, A., Fas-sot, G. Schäffer-Poeschel Verlag 2001, p. 175–198.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stahl, A. (2001).: Learning Feature Weights from Case Order Feedback. To appear in Proc. ICCBR 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wangenheim, A.V. (1996): Cyclops: Ein Konfigurationsansatz zur Integration hybrider Systeme am Beispiel der Bildauswertung, Reihe DISK!, infix-Verlag 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Richter, M.M. (2003). Learning Similarities for Informally Defined Objects. In: Kühn, R., Menzel, R., Menzel, W., Ratsch, U., Richter, M.M., Stamatescu, IO. (eds) Adaptivity and Learning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05594-6_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05594-6_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05510-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-05594-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics