Advertisement

Ground-Water Hydrology, Hydrogeologic Methods, and Hydrogeologic Data Acquisition

  • Fakhry A. Assaad
  • Philip E. LaMoreauxSr.

Abstract

Ground water is one of most valuable natural resources and includes about 14% of all fresh water on the earth. It is the source of about 40% of the water used for all purposes exclusive of hydroelectric generation and water for cooling electric power plants.

Keywords

Water Level Hydraulic Conductivity Ground Water Vadose Zone Drill Pipe 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alsay-Pippin Corporation (1980) Handbook of industrial drilling procedures and techniques. Lake Worth, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  2. Amax JW, Bass DM, Whiting RL (1960) Petroleum reservoir engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York (in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1977)Google Scholar
  3. Bouwer H (1989) The Bouwer and Rice slug test. An update. Groundwater Magazine 27(3):304–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouwer H, Rice RC (1976) A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifer with completely or partially penetrating wells. Water Resources Res 12(3):423–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brassington R (1988) Field hydrogeology. Geological Society of London, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York (Professional Handbook Series, pp 9–11, 16–20, 49–62, 77–78, 93–107)Google Scholar
  6. Cooper HH, Bredehoeft JD, Papadopulos IS (1967) Response of a finite diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water. Water Resources Res 3:263–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Domenico PA, Schwartz FW (1990) Physical and chemical hydrogeology — hydraulic testing: models, methods, and applications. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York (chap 5, p 142–144, 181) (reprinted by permission of John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)Google Scholar
  8. Edwards AG, Winn RH (1974) A summary of modern tools and techniques used in drill stem testing. Presented at the dedication of the U.S. East-West Trade Center, Tulsa, Oklahoma (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 600/2.77–240, 1977)Google Scholar
  9. Ferris JG (1951) Ground water. In: Wister CO, Brater EF (eds) Hydrology. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Heath RC (1987) Basic ground water hydrology. USGS, U.S. Government Printing Office, Denver, Colorado (Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2220, pp 1–6)Google Scholar
  11. Hornberger GM (1993) Hydrologic science: keeping pace with changing values and perceptions. National Academy Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  12. Hughes TH, Memon BA, LaMoreaux PE (1994) Landfills in karst terrains. Bulletin of the Association of Engineering Geologists 31(2):203–208Google Scholar
  13. Hvorslev MJ (1951) Time lag and soil permeability in ground-water observations. Waterways Experiment Station, Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army, Vicksburg, Mississippi (Tech Report, District Section, Bulletin 36)Google Scholar
  14. Kilpatrick FA (1954) Formation testing, the petroleum engineer. In: USEPA (ed) An introduction to the technology of subsurface wastewater injection. USEPA, Cincinnati, Ohio (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 600/2–77–240, pp 90–91, 1977)Google Scholar
  15. Konikow LF, Bredehoeft JD (1992) Ground-water models cannot be validated. U.S. Geological Survey, USA (Advances in Water Resources 15:75–83)Google Scholar
  16. Krumbein WC, Graybill SA (1965) An introduction to statistical models in geology. McGraw Hill Book Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. LaMoreaux PE, Tanner J (2001) Springs and bottled waters of the world — ancient history, source, occurrence, quality, and use. Springer-Verlag, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meinzer OE (1942) Physics of the earth. Part 9- Hydrology. McGrasw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. NASA GSFC (2003) The wate rcycle — a multi phase journey (http://earthobsevatoiry.nasa.gov/Library/Water/water_2.html)Google Scholar
  20. Sanders L (1998) A manual of field hydrogeology. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  21. Sara MN (1994) Standard handbook for solid hazardous waste facility assessments. Lewis Publishers, an imprint of CRC Press, Boca Rotan, Florida, pp 2.1–2.13, 2.20–2.22, 2.30–2.35, 3.1–3.4Google Scholar
  22. Soliman MM, LaMoreaux PE, Memon B, Assaad F, LaMoreaux JW (1998) Environmental hydrogeology. Lewis Publishers, CRC, Boca Rotan, Florida, pp 41–43Google Scholar
  23. Palmer AN (2000) Hydrologic control of cave pattern in spele0genesis — evolution of karst aquifers. National Speleological Society Inc., Huntsville, AL 35810, USA, pp 77–79Google Scholar
  24. Theis CV (1935) The relation between the lowering of the piezometric and rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground-water storage. American Geophysical Union, Transactions of the 16th Meeting, v2, pp 519–524Google Scholar
  25. UNESCO, WMO (1977) Hydrological maps — studies and reports in hydrology — a contribution to the International Hydrological Decade.Google Scholar
  26. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1977) An introduction to the technology of subsurface waste-water injection. U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, Ohio (Environmental Protection Series, 600/2–77–240, pp 71–73, 90–91)Google Scholar
  27. USGS (1977) Ground water manual — a water resources technical publication. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, USA, pp 195–200Google Scholar
  28. USGS (1984) Water resources — Earth’s water distribution (http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/earthwherewater.html)Google Scholar
  29. Ward RC (1975) Principles of hydrology. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, Great Britain, pp 4–6Google Scholar

Selected References

  1. American Geological Institute (AGI) (2002) Water. Environ. Awareness series; in printGoogle Scholar
  2. Barlow AC (1972) Basic disposal well design in underground waste management and environmental implications. In: Cook TD (ed) American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, Oklahoma, (Memoir 18, pp 72–76)Google Scholar
  3. Brassington R (1998) Field hydrogeology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, England, pp 66–85, 120–131Google Scholar
  4. Brown RH (1953) Selected procedures for analyzing aquifer test data. J Am Wat Works Ass 45(8):844–866Google Scholar
  5. Cooper HH Jr, Jacob CE (1946) A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well-field history. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 27(IV):526–534Google Scholar
  6. Dawson KJ, Istok JD (1991) Aquifer testing — design and analysis of pumping and slug tests. Department of Civil Engineering, Oregon State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  7. Deming D (2002) Introduction to hydrogeology. University of Oklahoma, Library of Congress Cataloging-in-publication Data, McGraw Hill, Boston, MA (chap 1, pp 1–18)Google Scholar
  8. Domenico PA, Schwartz FW (1997) Physical and chemical hydrogeology — hydraulic testing: models, methods, and applications, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons. Inc., New York (chap 6, pp 103–105, 115–116, 118–120)Google Scholar
  9. Ferris JG, Knowles, DB, Brown RH, Stallman RW (1962) Theory of aquifer tests. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1536-EGoogle Scholar
  10. Freeze RA, Cherry JA (1979) Ground water. Prentice Hall Inc., Englewwo Cliffs, New Jersey, pp 45–61, 152–163Google Scholar
  11. LaMoreaux PE, Hughes TH, Memon BA, Lineback N (1999) Hydrogeological assessment — Figeh Spring, Damascus, Syria. Envon Geol Water Soc 13(2):73–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lohman SW (1972) Ground water hydraulics. U.S. Geological Survev Professional Paper 708Google Scholar
  13. Todd DK (1980) Ground water hydrology, 2nd edn. University of California, Berkeley and David Keith Todd Consulting Engineers, Inc., John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, pp 64–70Google Scholar
  14. Walton WC (1970) Ground water reservoir evaluation. McGrawHill Series. In: Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, pp 3–5Google Scholar
  15. Warner DL (1965) Deep well injection of liquid waste. U.S. Dept. of Health Education and Welfare, Public Health Service (Publication no. 99, WP-21)Google Scholar
  16. World Health Organization (WHO) (1993) Guideline drinkingwater quality, 2nd edn, vol 1: recommendations. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Stanfill DF III, McMillan KS (1985a) Inspection of hazardous waste sites using ground-penetrating radar (GPR). Hazardous Materials Control Research Institute (H.M.C.R.I.), Cincinnati, OH (Proc. National Conference on Hazardous Waste and Environmental Emergencies, May 1985, pp 244–249)Google Scholar
  2. Stanfill DF III, McMillan KS (1985b) Radar-mapping of gasoline and other hydrocarbons in the ground. Hazardous Materials Control Research Institute (H.M.C.R.I.), Washington, D.C. (Proc. 6th National Conference on Management of Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites, November, 1985, pp 269–274)Google Scholar

Selected References

  1. Driscoll FG (ed) (1986) Ground water and wells, 2nd edn. Johnson Division, St. Paul, MNGoogle Scholar
  2. Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (1992) Standard operating proceduresGoogle Scholar
  3. Meinzer OE (1942) Physics of the earth, part 9: hydrology. McGrawHill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. P. E. LaMoreaux and Associates Inc. (2000) Comprehensive quality assurance plan. Tuscaloosa, AlabamaGoogle Scholar
  5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1996) Environmental compliance branch standard operating procedures and quality assurance manual. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  6. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2002) SW-846 test methods for evaluating solid wastes, physical/chemical methods. Washington, D.C. (current on-line version)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fakhry A. Assaad
    • 1
  • Philip E. LaMoreauxSr.
    • 1
  1. 1.P.E. LaMoreaux & Associates Inc.TuscaloosaUSA

Personalised recommendations