Why Do the Elderly Use Complementary and Alternative Medicine?

  • A. Furnham


Many forms of the complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) can trace their history back literally hundreds of years. Acupuncture, herbalism and homoeopathy all claim a long lineage in terms of practice. But it has been particularly in the last fifty years (and more particularly in the past 20 years) that have seen a dramatic and sustained growth in interest in the area throughout the western world and people from many different age groups. Growth in the use of an increasingly wide variety of CAM therapies has quite naturally led to increasing research endeavour to answer questions about the efficacy and choice of CAM [60, 62, 72] compared to orthodox, western, medicine.


Alternative Medicine Complementary Medicine Conventional Medicine Medical Encounter Orthodox Medicine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Aakster C (1986) Concepts in alternative Medicine. Soc Sci Med 22: 265–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Astin J (1988) Why patients use alternative medicine: Results of a national study. J Amer Med Assoc 279: 1548–1953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Astin J, Pelletier K, Marie A, Haskell W (2000) Complementary and alternative medicine use among elderly person: One-year analysis of a Blue Shield Medicare Supplement. J Gerontol 55: 4–9Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bakx K (1991) The “eclipse” of folk medicine in western society. Sociol Health Illness 13Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baum M (1989) Rationalism versus irrationalism in the care of the sick: science versus the absurd (editorial). Med J Aust 151 (11–12): 607–608PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    BMA (1993) Complementary medicine. Report of the Board of Science and EducationGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boon H (1998) Canadian naturopathic practitioners: Holistic and scientific world views. Soc Sci Med 46: 1213–1225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Budd C, Fisher B, Parruder D, Price L (1990) A model of co-operation between complementary and allopathic medicine in a primary care setting. Brit J Gen Pract 40 (338): 376–378.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bullock M, Pheley A, Kiresuk T, Lenz S, Culliton P (1997) Characteristics and complaints of patients seeking therapy at a hospital-based alternative medicine clinic. J Altern Complement Med 3: 31–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Buono M, Urauli O, Marietta P, Padoanik W, Leo D (2001) Alternative medicine in a sample of 655 community-dwelling elderly. J Psychosom Res 50: 147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cant S, Calnan M (1991) On the margins of the medical market place? An exploratory study of alternative practitioners’ perceptions. Sociol Health Illness 13: 46–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Canter D, Nanke L (1989) Emerging priorities in complementary medical research. Complement Med Res 3: 14–21Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Canter D, Nanke L (1991) Psychological aspects of complementary medicine. Paper presented at University of Keele, JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cassileth BR (1986) Unorthodox Cancer Medicine. Cancer Invest 4 (6): 591–598PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cassileth B (1998) The social implications of questionable cancer therapies. Cancer 63 (7): 1247–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cassileth BR, Zuphis RV, Sutton-Smith K, March V (1980) Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med 92 (6): 83206Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Donnelly W, Spykerboer S, Thong Y (1985) Are patients who use alternative medicine dissatisfied with orthodox medicine? Med J Aust 142 (10): 539–541PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Downer S, Cody M, Mcluskey P, Wilson P, Arnott S, Lister T, Slevin M. (1994) Pursuit and practice of complementary therapies by cancer patients receiving conventional treatment. Br Med J 309: 86–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eisenberg D, Kessler RC, Foster C, Norlock F, Calkins D, Del Banco T (1993) Unconventional medicine in the United States. N Engl J Med 328: 246–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eisenberg D, Davish R, Ettner S, Appel S, Wilkey S, Van Rompay H, Kessler R (1998). Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997. J Amer Med Assoc 289: 1569–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ernst E, Resch K-L, White A (1995) Complementary medicine: what physicians think of it. Arch Intern Med 155: 2405–2408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ernst E, Willoughby M, Weihmayr T (1995) Nine possible reasons for choosing complementary medicine. Perfusion 8: 356–359Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ernst E (1996) Complementary medicine: An objective appraisal. Butterworth Heinemann, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ernst E, Kaptchuk T (1996). Complementary Medicine–the case foe dialogue. J Royal College Physicians London 30: 410–412Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ernst E (1997) Complementary medicine: does it have a role in the medical care of elderly people. Rev Clini Gerontol 7: 353–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ernst E, Furnham A (1998) BMW sales and complementary medicine: Cause or correlation. Unpublished paperGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Finnigan M (1991) The Centre for the Study of Complementary Medicine: An attempt to understand its popularity through psychological, demographic and operational criteria. Complement Med Res 5: 83–88Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fischer P, Ward A (1994) Complementary Medicine in Europe. Br Med J 309: 107–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Foucault M (1979) Discipline and Punishment. Penguin: Harmondsworth, MiddlesexGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fulder SJ, Munro RE (1985) Complementary medicine in the United Kingdom: patients, practitioners, and consultations. Lancet 2 (8454): 542–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Furnham A (1986) Medical students’ beliefs about five different specialties. Br Med J 293: 1067–1680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Furnham A, Smith C (1988) Choosing alternative medicine: a comparison of the beliefs of patients visiting a GP and a homoeopath. Soc Sci Med 26: 685–687PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Furnham A (1993) Attitudes to alternative medicine: a study of the perception of those studying orthodox medicine. Complement Ther Med 1: 120–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Furnham A, Bhagrath R (1993) A comparison of health beliefs and behaviours of clients of orthodox and complementary medicine. Br J Clin Psychol 32: 237–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Furnham A (1994) Explaining health and illness. Soc Sci Med 39: 715–725PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Furnham A, Forey J (1994) The attitudes, behaviours and beliefs of patients of conventional vs. complementary (alternative) medicine. J Clin Psychol 50: 458–469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Furnham A, Kirkcaldy B (1995) The health beliefs and behaviours of orthodox and complementary medicine clients. Br J Clin Psychol 25: 49–61Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Furnham A, Hanna D, Vincent C (1995) Medical students’ attitudes to complementary medical therapies. Complement Ther Med 3: 212–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Furnham A, Vincent C, Wood R (1995) The health beliefs and behaviours of three groups of complementary medicine and a general practice group of patients. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 1: 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Furnham A (1997a) Why do people choose and use complementary therapies? In: Ernst E (ed) Complementary Medicine: An Objective Approach. Butterworth-Heinemann, London, pp 71–88Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Furnham A (1997b) Flight from science: alternative medicine, post modernism and relativism. In: Fuller R, Walsh P, Mcginley P (eds) A century of psychology. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Furnham A, Baguma F (1999) Cross-cultural differences in explanations for health and illness. Mental Health, Religion and Culture 2: 121–134Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Furnham A, Vincent C (2000) Reasons for using CAM. In: Kelner M, Wellman B, Pescosolido B, Saks M (eds) Complementary and alternative medicine: challenge and change. Harwood Academic Publisherr, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gaus W, Hogel J (1995) Studies on the efficacy of unconventional therapies: Problems and design. Drug Research 45: 88–92Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gray R (1998) Four perspectives on unconventional therapies. Health 2: 55–74Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Greenblatt R, Hollander H, McMaster J, Henke C (1991) Polypharmacy among patients attending an AIDS clinic. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 4: 136–143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gursoy A (1996) Beyond the orthodox: Heresy in medicine and the social sciences from a cross-cultural perspective. Soc Sci Med 43: 577–592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hertschel C, Kohnen R, Hauser G, Lindner M, Halo E, Ernst E (1996) Complementary medicine today: Patient decision for physician or magician. Eur J Phys Med Rehabil 6: 144–150Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hewer W (1983) The relationship between the alternative practitioner and his patient. A review. Psychother Psychosom 40 (1–4): 172–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kelner M, Wellman B (1997) Who seeks alternative care? A profile of the users of five modes of treatment. J Altern Complement Med 3: 127–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Knipschild P (1988) Looking for gall bladder disease in the patient’s iris. Br Med J 297 (6663): 1578–1581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Knipschild P, Kleijnen J, Ter-Riet G (1990) Belief in the efficacy of alternative medicine among general practitioners in The Netherlands. Soc Sci Med 31 (5): 625–626PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Levin J, Coreil J (1986) “New age” healing in the U.S. Soc Sci Med 23(9): 889–897Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lewith GT, Aldridge DA (1991) Complementary medicine and the European Community. C.W. Daniel, Saffron Walden, EssexGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lupton D (1997) Consumerism, reflexivity and the medical encounter. Soc Sci Med 45: 373–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lynse N (1989) Theoretical and empirical problems in the assessment of alternative medical technologies. Scand J Soc Med 17: 257–263Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    McKee J (1988) Holistic health and the critique of Western medicine. Soc Sci Med 26: 775–785PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Moore J, Phipps K, Marcer D, Lewith GT (1985) Why do people seek treatment by alternative medicine? Br Med J 290 (6461): 28–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Murray J, Shepherd S (1988) Alternative or additional medicine? An exploratory study in general practice. Soc Sci Med 37: 983–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Sharma U (1992) Complementary medicine today: Practitioners and patients. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Skrabanek P (1988) Paranormal health claims. Experientia 44 (4): 303–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Stalker D, Glymore L (1989) (eds) Examining Holistic Medicine. Promotheus, Buffalo, NYGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Strong P (1979) Sociological imperialism and the medical profession. Soc Sci Med 13: 199–211Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Taylor R (1985) Alternative medicine and the medical encounter in Britain and the United States. In: Salmon J, Warren P (eds) Alternative medicine: prejudice and policy perspectives. Tavistock, London, pp. 191–221Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Thomas KJ, Carr J, Westlake L, Williams BT (1991) Use of non-orthodox and conventional health care in Great Britain. Br Med J 302 (6770): 207–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Turner B (1987) Medical Power and Social Knowledge, Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Vecchio P (1994) Attitudes to alternative medicine by rheumatology outpatient attenders. J Rheumatol 21: 145–147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Verhoef M, Sutherland L, Birkich L (1990) Use of alternative medicine by patients attending a gastroenterology clinic. Can Med Assoc J 142: 121–125Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Vincent C, Furnham A (1994) The perceived efficacy of complementary and orthodox medicine. Complement Ther Med 2: 128–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Vincent C, Furnham A (1995) Why do patients turn to complementary medicine? An empirical study. Br J Clin Psychol 35: 37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Vincent C, Furnham A, Willsmore M (1995) The perceived efficacy of complementary and orthodox medicine in complementary and general practice patients. Health Educ Res 10: 395–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Vincent C, Furnham A (1997) Complementary Medicine: A Research Perspective. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Vincent C, Furnham A (1999) Complementary Medicine: state of the evidence. J R Soc Med 92: 170–177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Visser E, Peters L, Rasker J (1992) Rheumatologists and their patients who seek alternative care: An agreement to disagree. Br J Rheumatol 31: 488–490Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Wharton R. and Lewith G. (1986) Complementary medicine and the general practitioner. Br Med J 292 (6534): 1498–1500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    White A, Ernst E (2000) Economic analysis of complementary medicine: a systematic review. Complement Ther Med 8: 111–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Williams S, Calnan M (1996) The “limits” of medicalization? Modern medicine and the lay populace on “late” modernity. Soc Sci Med 42: 1609–1620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Furnham

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations