Conclusions: The Role of Canopy Flux Measurements in Global C-Cycle Research

  • R. Valentini
  • G. Matteucci
  • A. J. Dolman
  • E.-D. Schulze
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 163)


The carbon cycle is central to the Earth System, being inextricably coupled with climate, the water cycle, the nutrient cycles, and the production of bio-mass by photosynthesis on land and in the oceans. Over the past century, the Earth’s carbon cycle experienced large perturbations. Since the beginning of the industrial revolution, the mean global carbon dioxide (C02) concentra-ion has risen from about 280 ppm to over 368 ppm (Conway et al. 1994; Keeling and Whorf 2002). The worldwide rise in atmospheric C02 concentration is occurring due to an imbalance between the rate at which anthropogenic and natural sources emit C02 (by burning fossil fuel and respiring) and the rate at which biospheric and oceanic sinks remove C02 from the atmosphere by photosynthesis and physio chemical processes. Superimposed on the overall trend regarding C02 is a record of great interannual variability of sources and sinks in the rate of growth of atmospheric C02. Typical values are on the order of 0.5 to 3 ppm year-1. On a mass basis, these values correspond to 1 and 5 Gt C year-1, respectively. Potential sources of year-to-year changes in C02 remain a hot topic of debate. Such variation has been attributed to El Niño/La Nina events, which cause regions of droughts or excessive rainfall (Conway et al. 1994; Keeling et al. 1995), and alterations in the timing and length of the growing season (Myneni et al. 1997; Randerson et al. 1997).


Gross Primary Production Carbon Budget Eddy Covariance Global Change Biol Eddy Correlation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amiro BD, MacPherson JI, Desjardins RL (1999) BOREAS flight measurements of forest-fire effects on carbon dioxide and energy fluxes. Agric For Meteor 96:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aubinet M, Grelle A, Ibrom A, Rannik U, Moncrieff J, Foken T, Kowalski A, Martin P, Berbigier P, Bernhofer C, Clement R, Elbers J, Granier A, Grunwald T, Morgenstern K, Pilegaard K, Rebmann C, Snijders W, Valentini R, Vesala T (2000) Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange of European forests: the EUROFLUX methodology. Adv Ecol Res 30:113–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldocchi DD, Valentini R, Running SR, Oechel W, Dahlman R (1996) Strategies for measuring and modeling C02 and water vapor fluxes over terrestrial ecosystems. Global Change Biol 2:159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldocchi DD, Falge E, Gu L, Olson R, Hollinger D, Running S, Anthoni P, Bernhofer C, Davis K, Fuentes J, Goldstein A, Katul G, Law B, Lee X, Mahli Y, Meyers T, Munger W, Oechel W, Paw UK, Pilegaard K, Schmid H, Valentini R, Verma S, Vesala T, Wilson K, Wofsy S (2001) FLUXNET: a new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor and energy flux densities. Bull Am Meteor Soc 82:2415–2435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumgartner A (1969) Meteorological approach to the exchange of C02 between atmosphere and vegetation, particularly forests stands. Photosynthetica 3:127–149Google Scholar
  6. Conway TJ, Tans PP, Waterman LS, Thoning KW, Kitzis DR, Masarie K, Zhang N (1994) Evidence for interannual variability of the carbon cycle from NOAA/CMDL global sampling network. J Geophys Res 99:22831–22855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Denmead OT (1964) Evaporation sources and apparent diffusivities in a forest canopy. J Appl Meteorol 3:393–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Denmead OT (1969) Comparative micrometeorology of a wheat field and a forest of Pinus radiata. Agric Fore Meteor 6:357–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goulden ML, Wofsy SC, Harden JW, Trumbore SE, Crill PM, Gower ST, Fires T, Daube BC, Fan SM, Sutton DJ, Bazzaz A, Munger JW (1998) Sensitivity of boreal forest carbon balance to soil thaw. Science 279:214–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gower ST, Kucharik CJ, Norman JM (1999) Direct and indirect estimation of leaf area index, fpar and net primary production of terrestrial ecosystems. Remote Sensing Environ 70:29–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Inoue I (1958) An aerodynamic measurement of photosynthesis over a paddy field. Proceedings of the 7th Japan National Congress of Applied Mechanics, pp 211–214Google Scholar
  12. Jarvis PG, James GB, Landsberg JJ (1976) Coniferous forest. In: Monteith JL (ed) Vegetation and the atmosphere, vol 2. Academic Press, London, pp 171–240Google Scholar
  13. Kauppi PE, Mielikainen K, Kuuseia K (1992) Biomass and carbon budget of European forests, 1971 to 1990. Science 256:70–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keeling CD, Whorf TP (1994) Atmospheric C02 records from sites in the SIO air sampling network. In: Trends ’93: a compendium of data on global change. ORNL/CDIAC-65, Oak Ridge, TN, pp 16–26Google Scholar
  15. Keeling CD, Whorf TP (2002) Atmospheric C02 records from sites in the SIO air sampling network. In: Trends: a compendium of data on global change. Carbon dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge, TN, USAGoogle Scholar
  16. Keeling CD, Whorf TP, Wahlen M, v d Plicht J (1995) Interannual extremes in the rate of rise of atmospheric carbon dioxide since 1980. Nature 375:666–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lemon ER (1960) Photosynthesis under field conditions. II. An aerodynamic method for determining the turbulent carbon dioxide exchange between the atmosphere and a corn field. Agric J 52:697–703Google Scholar
  18. Lindroth A, Grelle A, Morén AS (1998) Long-term measurements of boreal forest carbon balance reveal large temperature sensitivity. Global Change Biol $:443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Monteith JL, Szeicz G (1960) The C02 flux over a field of sugar beets. Q J R Meteorol Soc 86:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Myneni RB, Keeling CD, Tucker CJ, Asrar G, Nemani RR (1997) Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981–1991. Nature 386:698–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oechel WC, Vourlitis GL, Hastings SJ, Zulueta RC, Hinzman L, Kane D (2000) Acclimation of ecosystem C02 exchange in the Alaskan Arctic in response to decadal climate warming. Nature 406:978–981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Papale D, Valentini R (2002) Spatial and temporal assessment of biospheric carbon fluxes at continental scale by neural network optimization. In: Mencuccini M, Grace J, Moncrieffs Mc Naughton J (eds) Forest at land-atmosphere interface. A festschrift for Paul Jarvis. CAB Int, Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
  23. Pielke RA, Avissar R, Raupach M, Dolman AJ, Zeng X, Denning AS (1998) Interactions between the atmosphere and terrestrial ecosystems: influence on weather and climate. Global Change Biol 4:61–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Randerson JT, Thompson MV, Conway TJ, Fung IY, Field CB (1997) The contribution of terrestrial sources and sinks to trends in the seasonal cycle of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Global Biogeochem Cycles 11:535–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schulze ED (2000) Carbon and nitrogen cycling in European forest ecosystems. Ecological studies. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 499 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schulze ED, Lloyd J, Kelliher FM, Wirth C, Rebmann C, Lukher B, Mund M, Milykova I, Schulze W, Ziegler W, Varlagin A, Valentini R, Dore S, Grigoriev S, Kolle O, Vygodskaya NN (1999) Productivity of forests in the Eurosiberian boreal region and their potential to act as a carbon sink. Global Change Biol 5:703–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schulze ED, Valentini R, Sanz MJ (2002) The long way from Kyoto to Marrakesh: implications of the Kyoto Protocol negotiations for global ecology. Global Change Biol 8:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Valentini R, Scarascia Mugnozza G, De Angelis P, Bimbi R (1991) An experimental test of the eddy correlation technique over a Mediterranean macchia canopy. Plant Cell Environ 14:987–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Valentini, R, Matteucci G, Dolman AJ, Schulze E-D, Rebmann C, Moors EJ, Granier A, Gross P, Jensen NO, Pilegaard K, Lindroth A, Grelle A, Bernhofer C, Grünwald T, Aubinet M, Ceulemans R, Kowalski AS, Vesala T, Rannik Ü, Berbigier P, Loustau D, Gudmundsson J, Thorgeirsson H, Ibrom A, Morgenstern K, Clement R, Moncrieff J, Montagnani L, Minerbi S, Jarvis PG (2000) Respiration as the main determinant of European forests carbon balance. Nature 404:861–865PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Verma SB, Baldocchi DD, Anderson DE, Matt DR, Clement RE (1986) Eddy fluxes of C02, water vapor, and sensible heat over a deciduous forest. Bound Layer Meteor 36:71–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Valentini
  • G. Matteucci
  • A. J. Dolman
  • E.-D. Schulze

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations