Ecological Applications of Adaptive Agents

  • F. Recknagel

Abstract

Ecologists are constantly searching for new modelling paradigms in order to simulate realistically the distinct nature of ecosystems by computer models. The ecosystem concept as established by Forbes (1887) had the most forming influence on ecosystem modelling in the past century. It no longer bears close examination as ecosystems like lakes are known to evolve and being driven by exogenous forces rather than existing permanently and in isolation. However, the ecosystem approach resulted in valuable databases from monitoring as well as quantitative and qualitative descriptions of ecosystem dynamics and has made ecology a predictive science (Rigler and Peters 1995). Computer models resulting from the ecosystem concept were mainly based on differential equations (DE) for well-defined ecological entities and processes, adjusted by measured or estimated parameters. Radtke and Straskraba (1980) firstly tried to overcome the rigidity of such models by parameter optimization of ecological goal functions relevant to lake ecosystems as introduced by Straskraba (1977). The authors considered their results as contribution to a structural self-optimising ecosystem model but admitted that more adequate models and more suitable optimisation procedures would be needed to make it a success. In order to overcome model rigidity, Kaluzny and Swartzman (1985) suggested a library of alternative representations of ecological processes from where a simulation model picks the most relevant one for a specific ecological situation.

Keywords

Biomass Phosphorus Chlorophyll Recombination Phytoplankton 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bobbin J, Recknagel F (2001) Knowledge Discovery for Prediction and Explanation of Blue-Green Algal Dynamics in Lakes by Evolutionary Algorithms. Ecol. Modelling 146, 1–3, 253–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Booth G (1997) Gecko: a continuos 2-D world for ecological modeling. Artif. Life 3, 147–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Forbes SA (1887) The lake as a microcosm. Bull.Sci.Ass., Peoria. Illinois, 77–87Google Scholar
  4. Holland JH (1992) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Addison-Wesley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Holland JH (1998) Emergence. From Chaos to Order. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  6. Holland JH, Miller JH (1991) Artificial adaptive agents in economic theory. American Economic Review 81, 2, 365–370Google Scholar
  7. Huston M, DeAngelis D, Post W (1988) New computer models unify ecological theory. BioScience 38, 10, 682–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jorgensen SE, Mejer H (1979) A holistic approach to ecological modelling. Ecol. Modelling 3, 39–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jorgensen SE (1986) Structural dynamics model. Ecol. Modelling 31, 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaluzny S, Swartzman G (1985) Simulation experiments comparing alternative process formulations using factorial design. Ecol.Modelling 28, 181–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kreft JU, Booth G, Wimpeny JWT (1998) BacSim, a simulator for individual-based modelling of bacterial colony growth. Microbiology 144, 3275–3287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lin F, Pai Y (2000) Using multi-agent simulation and learning to design new business processes. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 30, 3, 380–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Park RA, O’Neill RV, Bloomfield JA, Shugart HH, Booth RS, Goldstein RA, Mankin JB, Koonce JF, Scavia D, Adams MS, Clesceri LS, Colon EM, Dettman EH, Hoopes JA, Huff DD, Katz S, Kitchell JF, Koberger RC, La Row EJ, McNaught DC, Petersohn L, Titus JE, Weiler PR, Wilkinson JW, Zahorcak CS (1974) A generalized model for simulating lake ecosystems. Simulation 33–50Google Scholar
  14. Radtke E, Straskraba M (1980) Self-optimization in a phytoplankton model. Ecol. Modelling 9, 247–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Railsback StF (2001) Concepts from complex adaptive systems as a framework for individual-based modeling. Ecological Modelling 139, 47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Recknagel F, Bobbin J, Whigham P, Wilson H (2002) Comparative application of artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms for multivariate time series modelling of algal blooms in freshwater lakes. Journal of Hydroinformatics 4, 2, 125–134Google Scholar
  17. Recknagel F (1997) ANNA — Artificial Neural Network model predicting species abundance and succession of blue-green Algae. Hydrobiologia, 349, 47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Recknagel F, French M, Harkonen P, Yabunaka K (1997) Artificial neural network approach for modelling and prediction of algal blooms. Ecol. Modelling 96, 1–3, 11–28Google Scholar
  19. Recknagel F, Benndorf J (1982) Validation of the ecological simulation model SALMO. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 67, 1, 113–125Google Scholar
  20. Rigler FH, Peters RH (1995) Science and Limnology. Ecology Institute. OldendorfGoogle Scholar
  21. Schmitz OJ, Booth G (1997) Modelling food web complexity: The consequences of individual-based, spatially explicit behavioral ecology on trophic interactions. Evolutionary Ecology 11, 379–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Straskraba M (1979) Natural control mechanisms in models of aquatic ecosystems. Ecol. Modelling 6, 305–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Straskraba M, Gnauck A (1985) Freshwater Ecosystems, Modelling and Simulation. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  24. Takamura N, Otsuki A, Aizaki M, Nojiri Y (1992) Phytoplankton species shift accompanied by transition from nitrogen dependence to phosphorus dependence of primary production in Lake Kasumigaura, Japan. Arch. Hydrobiol. 124, 129–148Google Scholar
  25. Wan HA, Hunter A (1997) On artificial adaptive agents models of stock markets. Simulation 68, 5, 279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Whigham P, Recknagel F (2001) An Inductive Approach to Ecological Time Series Modelling by Evolutionary Computation. Ecol. Modelling 146, 1–3, 275–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Whigham P, Recknagel F (2001) Predicting Chlorophyll-a in Freshwater Lakes by Hybridising Process-Based Models and Genetic Algorithms. Ecol. Modelling 146, 1–3, 243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yao X Liu Y (1997) A new evolutionary system for evolving artificial neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 8, 3, 694–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Recknagel

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations