Skip to main content

Targeting and political support for welfare spending

  • Chapter
Conflict and Governance

Abstract

This paper investigates the political support for social assistance policies in a model in which incomes are stochastic (so that welfare policies have an insurance benefit) and unequal ex ante (so that welfare policies have a redistributive effect). With self-interested voting, narrow targeting may so reduce the probability of receiving benefits for the majority that the majority prefers to eliminate benefits altogether, even though the cost of narrowly targeted benefits is close to zero. In contrast, a majority of self-interested voters always supports positive welfare benefits when the policy is targeted sufficiently broadly. If voters are somewhat altruistic, the impact of targeting on political support for welfare spending diminishes but does not disappear.

We thank Christian Brinch for skillful research assistance. In addition, we thank Matt Rabin, Glenn Loury, John Ferejohn, Vidar Christiansen, Espen Moen, Fred Schroyen, Duane Swank and two anonymous referees for their comments and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the Norwegian Research Council for financial support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K.J. (1971) The Theory of Risk Bearing. In: Arrow, K.H. (ed.) Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing. Chicago: Markham

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, J. and Brown, J.A.C. (1957) The Lognormal Distribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. (1990) Income maintenance for the unemployed in Britain and the response to high unemployment. Ethics 100: 569–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, L. and Loewenstein, G. (1997) Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11: 109–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, N. (1992) Economic theory and the Welfare State: A survey and interpretation. Journal of Economic Literature 30: 741–803

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. (1990) Means testing versus universal provision in poverty alleviation programmes. Economica 57: 119–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. and Coate, S. (1992) Workfare versus Welfare: Incentive arguments for work requirements in poverty-alleviation programs. American Economic Review 82: 249–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. and Coate, S. (1995) The design of income maintenance programmes. Review of Economic Studies 62: 187–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, F.D. and Kahn, L.M. (1996) International differences in male wage inequality: Institutions versus market forces. Journal of Political Economy 104: 791–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H.P. (1977) The Inequality of Pay. Berkeley: University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Casamatta, G. Cremer, H. and Pestieau, P. (1998) On the political sustainability of redistributive social insurance systems. Unpublished paper presented at the ISPE Conference, “Political Economy of Tax Structure and the Relationship of Taxes to Benefits”, Oxford, Dec. 10–14, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • De Donder, P. and Hindriks, J. (1998) The political economy of targeting. Public Choice 95: 177–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1996) Transmutation and misrepresentation. Nordic Journal of Political Economy 23: 3–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend, I. and Blume, M.E. (1975) The demand for risky assets. American Economic Review 65: 900–922

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, J.S. and Smart, M.. (1996) Majority voting with single-crossing preferences. Journal of Public Economics 59: 219–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelbach, J.B. and Pritchett, L.H. (1997) Indicator targeting in a political equilibrium: Leakier can be better. Washington DC: World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 1523

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, R. (1991) Universal and Targeted Approaches to Relieving Poverty: An Alternative View. In: Jencks, C. and Peterson, P. (eds.) The Urban Underclass. Washington DC: Brookings Institution

    Google Scholar 

  • Killingsworth, M.R. (1983) Labor Supply. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Killingsworth, M.R. and Heckman, J.J. (1986) Female Labor Supply: A Survey. In: Ashenfelter, O. and Layard, R. (eds.) Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: North Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer, A.H. and Richard S.F. (1981) A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy 89: 914–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moene, K.O. and Wallerstein, M. (1997) Political Support for Targeted versus Universalistic Welfare Policies. Oslo, Norway: University of Oslo, Department of Economics Memorandum (19/7)

    Google Scholar 

  • Myles, J. and Pierson, P. (1997) Friedman’s Revenge: The Reform of ‘Liberal’ Welfare States in Canada and the United States. San Domenico di Fiesole, Italy: European University Institute Working Paper RSC 97/30

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1996) Employment Outlook July(1996) Paris: OECD

    Google Scholar 

  • Pencavel, J. (1986) Labor Supply of Men: A Survey. In: Ashenfelter, O. and Layard, R. (eds.) Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: North Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (1995) Social mobility and redistributive politics. Quarterly Journal of Economics CX: 551–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, M. (1995) Moral Preferences, Moral Constraints, and Self-Serving Biases. Unpublished paper. Berkeley CA: University of California, Department of Economics

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B. (1998) Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sandmo, A. (1991) Economists and the Welfare State. European Economic Review 35: 213–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, H.-W. (1995) A theory of the Welfare State. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 97: 495–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T. (1991) Targeting within Universalism: Politically Viable Policies to Combat Poverty in the United States. In: Jencks, C. and Peterson, P. (eds.) The Urban Underclass. Washington DC: Brookings Institution

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabellini, G. (1991) The politics of intergenerational transfer. Journal of Political Economy 99: 335–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Parijs, P. (1992) Arguing for Basic Income. London: Verso

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moene, K.O., Wallerstein, M. (2003). Targeting and political support for welfare spending. In: Glazer, A., Konrad, K.A. (eds) Conflict and Governance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05121-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05121-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05527-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-05121-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics