Abstract
The weak decay processes known from early times are all described by charged-current interactions. As given in (2.6), the charged current is the sum of leptonic and hadronic currents:
, where
and
.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
This treatment is invalid for relativistic wave functions, which are singular at the origin. More appropriately, the Fermi function is given by the wave functions at the nuclear radius rather than at the origin.
For more accurate correction factors using a numerical solution of the Dirac equation for finite nuclei, see [345].
The authors thank T. Kubota for discussion.
The corrections are identical with those for μ decay, and hence the effects are absorbed into GF. See [403].
For antineutrinos, the background can be efficiently reduced by a coincidence technique using produced neutrons, and hence other methods can be successfully used.
18O is an exceptional case; the neutrino cross section of 18O is close to 2 × δ (νn )
This is due to a somewhat tricky, but lucky situation. The cross section for the neutrino flux other than B neutrinos is solely determined by the GT(gs), which is well determined. For the B neutrino capture cross section a large change from GarcÃa et al.’s B(GT) to Trinder et al.’s B(GT) is mostly a redistribution of the GT strengths at low-lying levels. It is fortunate that the first excited level of A is located above the maximum energies of all solar neutrino fluxes other than B neutrinos and that the GT strength to the first excited state is estimated by subtraction from the total decay rate, which is well constrained. The calculation of Kuramoto et al. takes into account the large GT strengths for E > 5 MeV levels, as expected from the (pn) experiment.
See also Butler and Chen [484], who used nucleon-nucleon effective field theory to calculate νd cross sections. In their calculation, however, there is one free parameter (an isovector axial two-body matrix element), and the results agree with those of either Kubodera et al. or Haxton et al. depending on the choice of this parameter. The calculation is limited to a low-energy region > 20 MeV. This contrasts with the earlier conclusion of Ying et al. [482], which is ascribed to an error in their computer code [473,483].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fukugita, M., Yanagida, T. (2003). Applications of the Electroweak Theory. In: Physics of Neutrinos. Texts and Monographs in Physics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05119-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05119-1_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07851-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-05119-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive