Advertisement

Brassica and Legume Chromosomes

  • K. Fukui
Part of the Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry book series (AGRICULTURE, volume 52)

Abstract

The numbers of the chromosomes of Brassica and legumes were identified at an early stage of chromosome research. The earliest report on the chromosome numbers of Brassica species was back in 1916 when Takamine precisely determined the chromosome number of B. rapa (B. campestris, A genome) as 20. Trouard-Riolle also determined the chromosome number of Raphanus sativus as 18 in 1916. The chromosome numbers of B. oleracea and B. nigra, which contain the C and B genomes, respectively, were also determined as 18 and 16, respectively, by Karpechenko in 1924 (Gomez-Campo and Hinata 1980). By 1980, chromosome numbers of more than 240 taxa of the tribe Bras-sicaceae had been determined and listed (Gomez-Campo and Hinata 1980). Chromosome research into the legumes has a similar history to that of Bras-sica. The chromosome number of Glycine max, with typical small type (S-type; Fukui 1996; Fukui et al. 2000) chromosomes, was reported by Karpechenko in 1925 and by Veatch in 1934 (Singh et al. 2001). The chromosome number of Lotus japonicus was reported as 2n = 24 in 1930 (Kawakami 1930). The fact, however, that all the chromosomes are similar in both size and morphology at mitotic metaphase, made it difficult to identify individual chromosomes. Although Yanagisawa et al. (1991) found that there are marker chromosomes commonly observed in the species of the genus Glycine, it is far from complete identification of all the chromosomes.

Keywords

Proximal Region Rice Chromosome rDNA Locus Lotus Japonicus Plant Chromosome 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbo S, Miller TE, Reader SM, Dunford RR, King IP (1994) Detection of ribosomal DNA sites in lentil and chickpea by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Genome 37:713–716PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheng BF, Heneen WK, Chen BY (1995a) Mitotic karyotypes of Brassica campestris and Brassica alboglabra and identification of the B. alboglabra chromosome in an addition line. Genome 38:313–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheng BF, Heneen WK, Pedersen C (1995b) Ribosomal RNA gene loci and their nucleolar activity in Brassica alboglabra Bailey. Hereditas 123:169–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheng RI, Grant WF (1973) Species relationships in the Lotus corniculatus group as determined by karyotype and cytophotometric analysis. Can J Genet Cytol 15:101–105Google Scholar
  5. Chua YL, Brown APC, Gray JC (2001) Targeted histone acetylation and altered nuclease accessibility over short regions of the pea plastocyanin gene. Plant Cell 13:599–612PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dubcovsky J, Dvorak J (1995) Ribosomal RNA multigene loci: nomads of the Triticeae genomes. Genetics 140:1367–1377PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Endo TR (1986) complete identification of wheat chromosomes by means of a C-banding technique. Jpn J Genet 61:89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fransz RF, Alonso-Bianco C, Liharska TB, Peeters AJM, Zabel P et al. (1996) High-resolution physical mapping in Arabidopsis thaliana and tomato by fluorescence in situ hybridization to extended DNA fibers. Plant J 9:421–430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fuchs J, Schubert I (1995) Localization of seed protein genes on metaphase chromosomes of Vicia faba via fluorescence in situ hybridization. Chromosome Res 3:94–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fuchs J, Kuhne M, Schubert I (1998a) Assignment of linkage groups to pea chromosomes after karyotyping and gene mapping by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Chromosoma 107:272–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fuchs J, Strehl S, Brandes A, Schweizer D, Schubert I (1998b) Molecular-cytogenetic characterization of the Vicia faba genome-heterochromatin differentiation, replication patterns and sequence localization. Chromosome Res 6:219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fukui K (1986) Standardization of karyotyping plant chromosome by a newly developed chromosome image analyzing system (CHIAS). Theor Appl Genet 72:27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fukui K (1996) Plant chromosomes at mitosis. In: Fukui K, Nakayama S (eds) Plant chromosomes: laboratory methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp1–17Google Scholar
  14. Fukui K, Iijima K (1991) Somatic chromosome map of rice by imaging methods. Theor Appl Genet 81:589–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fukui K, Kamisugi Y (1995) Mapping of C-banded Crepis chromosomes by imaging methods. Chromosome Res 3:79–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fukui K, Mukai Y (1988) Condensation pattern as a new image parameter for the identification of small chromosomes in plants. Jpn J Genet 63:59–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fukui K, Nakayama S (1996) Analysis of chromosome information. In: Fukui K, Nakayama S (eds) Plant chromosomes: laboratory methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 241–255Google Scholar
  18. Fukui K, Nakayama S, Ohmido N, Yoshiaki H, Yamabe M (1998) Quantitative karyotyping of three diploid Brassica species by imaging methods and localization of 45S rDNA loci on the identified chromosomes. Theor Appl Genet 96:325–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fukui K, Ohmido N, Wako T (2000) Smallness: gain and loss in plant chromosome research. In: Olmo E, Redi A (eds) Chromosome today, vol 13. Birkrf user Verlag, Basel, Switzerland, pp 287–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Griffor MC, Vodkin LO, Singh RJ, Hymowitz T (1991) Fluorescent in situ hybridization to soybean metaphase chromosomes. Plant Mol Biol 17:101–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gomez-Campo C, Hinata K (1980) A check list of chromosome numbers in the tribe Brassicaceae. In: Tsunoda S, Hinata K, Gomez-Campo C (eds) Brassica crops and wild allies. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo, pp 51–63Google Scholar
  22. Ha S, Moore PH, Heinz D, Kato S, Ohmido N, Fukui K (1999) Quantitative chromosome map of the polyploid Saccharum spontaneum by multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization and imaging methods. Plant Mol Biol 39:1165–1173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Handberg K, Stougaard J (1992) Lotus japonicus, an autogamous, diploid legume species for classical and molecular genetics. Plant J 2:487–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hayashi M, Miyahara M, Sato S, Kato T, Yoshikawa M, Taketa M, Hayashi M, Pedrosa A, Onda R, Imaizumi-Anraku H, Bachmair A, Sandal N, Stougaard J, Murooka Y, Tabata S, Kawasaki S, Kawaguchi M, Harada K (2001) Construction of a genetic linkage map of the model legume Lotus japonicus using an intraspecific F2 population. DNA Res 8:301–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hu CH (1964) Further studies on the chromosome morphology of Oryza sativa L. In: Rice genetics and cytogenetics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 51–61Google Scholar
  26. Iijima K, Kakeda K, Fukui K (1991) Identification and characterization of somatic rice chromosomes by imaging methods. Theor Appl Genet 81:597–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ito M, Ohmido N, Akiyama Y, Fukui K (2000a) Quantitative chromosome map of Arabidopsis thaliana L. by imaging methods. Cytologia 65:325–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ito M, Miyamoto J, Mori Y, Fujimoto S, Uchiumi T, Abe M, Suzuki A, Tabata S, Fukui K (2000b) Genome and chromosome dimensions of Lotus japonicus. J Plant Res 113:435–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jiang Q, Gresshoff PM (1997) Classical and molecular genetics of the model legume Lotus japonicus. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 10:59–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kamisugi Y, Furuya N, Iijima K, Fukui K (1993) Computer-aided automatic identification of rice chromosomes by image parameters. Chromosome Res 1:189–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kamisugi Y, Nakayama S, O’Neill CN, Mathias RJ, Trick M, Fukui K (1998) Visualization of the Brassica self-incompatibility S-locus on identified oilseed rape chromosomes. Plant Mol Biol 38:1043–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kato S, Fukui K (1998) Condensation pattern (CP) analysis of plant chromosomes using a newly developed chromosome image analyzing system, CHIAS III. Chromosome Res 6:473–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kato S, Hirose T, Akiyama Y, O’Neill CM, Fukui K (1997) Manual on the chromosome image analyzing system III, CHIAS III. Res Rep Dev Agric Hokuriku Area 36:1–76Google Scholar
  34. Kawakami J (1930) Chromosome numbers in Leguminosae. Bot Mag (Tokyo) 44:319–328Google Scholar
  35. Koornneef M, wan Eden J, Hanhart CJ, Stam CJ, Branksma FJ, Feenstra WJ (1983) Linkage map of Arabidopsis thaliana. J Hered 74:265–272Google Scholar
  36. Kurata N, Omura T (1978) Karyotype analysis in rice I. A new method for identifying all chromosome pairs. Jpn J Genet 53:251–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lalonde BA, Nasrallah ME, Dwyer KG, Chen CH, Barlow B, Nasrallah JB (1989) A highly conserved Brassica gene with homology to the S-locus specific glycoprotein structural gene. Plant Cell 1:249–258PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Leitch AR, Schwarzacher T, Mosgoller W, Bennett MD, Heslop-Harrison JS (1991) Parental genomes are separated throughout the cell cycle in a plant hybrid. Chromosoma 101:206–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Li G, Chandrasekharan MB, Wolffe AP, Hall TC (2001) Chromatin structure and phaseolin gene regulation. Plant Mol. Biol 46:121–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Malusynska J, Heslop-Harrison JS (1993a) Molecular cytogenetics of the genus Arabidopsis: in situ localization of rDNA sites, chromosome numbers and diversity in centromeric hete-rochromatin. Ann Bot 71:479–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Malusynska J, Heslop-Harrison JS (1993b) Physical mapping of rDNA in Brassica species. Genome 36:774–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Murata M, Heslop-Harrison JS, Motoyoshi F (1997) Physical mapping of the 5S ribosomal RNA genes in Arabidopsis thaliana by multi-color fluorescence in situ hybridization with cosmid clones. Plant J 12:31–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ohmido N, Fukui K (1997) Visual verification of close disposition between a rice A genome-specific DNA sequence (TrsA) and the telomere sequence. Plant Mol Biol 35:963–968PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ohmido N, Akiyama Y, Fukui K (1998) Systematic mapping of unique nucleotide sequences on identified rice chromosomes. Plant Mol Biol 38:1081–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ohmido N, Kijima K, Ashikawa I, de Jong JH, Fukui K (2001) Visualization of the terminal structure of rice chromosomes using multicolor FISH on extended DNA fibers. Plant Mol Biol 47:413–421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Olin-Fatih M (1996) The morphology, cytology, and C-banded karyotypes of Brassica campestris, B. oleracea and B. napus plants regenerated from protoplasts. Theor Appl Genet 93:414–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schubert I (1984) Mobile nucleolus organizing regions (NORs) in Allium (Liliaceae s. lat.)—inferences from the specificity of silver staining. Plant Syst Evol 144:291–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schwarzacher T, Leitch AR, Bennett MD (1989) In situ localization of parental genomes in a wide hybrid. Ann Bot 64:315–324Google Scholar
  49. Shishido R, Sano Y, Fukui K (2000) Ribosomal DNAs: an exception to the conservation of gene order in rice genomes. Mol Gen Genet 263:586–591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shoemaker RC, Polzin K, Labate J, Specht J, Brummer EC, Olson T, Young N, Concibido V, Wilcox J, Tamulonis JP, Kochert G, Boerma HR (1996) Genomic duplication in soybean (Glycine subgenus soja). Genetics 144:329–338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Singh RJ, Kim HH, Hymowitz T (2001) Distribution of rDNA loci in the genus Glycine Wild. Theor Appl Genet 103:212–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Skorupska H, Albertsen MC, Longholz KD, Palmer RG (1989) Detection of ribosomal RNA genes in soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr., by in situ hybridization. Genome 32:1091–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Snowdon RJ, Koehler W, Koehler A (1997) A chromosomal localization and characterization of rDNA loci in the Brassica A and C genomes. Genome 40:582–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Strahl BD, Allis CD (2000) The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature 403:41–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Suzuki G, Kai N, Hirose T, Fukui K, Nishio T, Takayama S, Isogai A, Watanabe M, Hinata K (1999) Genomic organization of the S locus: Identification and characterization of genes in SLG/SRK region of S 9 haplotype of Brassica campestris (syn. rapa). Genetics 153:391–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Xu SJ, Singh RJ, Hymowitz T (2000) Monosomics in soybean: origin, identification, cytology, and breeding behavior. Crop Sci 40:985–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yanagisawa T, Tano S, Fukui K, Harada K (1991) Marker chromosomes commonly observed in the genus Glycine. Theor Appl Genet 81:606–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zheng J, Irifune K, Hirai K, Nakata M, Tanaka R, Morikawa H (1994) In situ hybridization to metaphase chromosomes in six species of Phaseolus and Vigna using ribosomal DNA as the probe. J Plant Res 107:365–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhong X, Fransz PF, Wennekes-van Eden J, Ramanna MS, van Kammen A, Zabel P (1998) FISH studies reveal the molecular and chromosomal organization of individual telomere domains in tomato. Plant J 13:507–517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Fukui
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biotechnology, Graduate School of EngineeringOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations