Abstract
The case [Chap. 4] of limiting frequencies vs. degrees of belief was opened anew in the 20th century. Two major semantic developments occured within ten years around Kolmogorov’s decisive contribution [Chap. 5] to the syntax of probability theory: Von Mises [1928] proposed a strictly frequentist interpretation, which we introduce in Sect. 6.1; and [De Finetti, 1937] offered a degree of belief interpretation [Sect. 6.3]. The semantics of the theory however turned out to be much more controversial than its syntax. Motivated in large part by some of the unresolved problems with von Mises’ approach, logicians were led to the clarification of the concept of randomness. This task was completed only after the notion of algorithmic complexity, pioneered by Kolmogorov [1963], became available and was extended from finite strings to infinite sequences by Martin-Löf [1966] [Sect. 6.2]; in that section, we make use of recursive function theory,the mathematical elements of which are summarized in Appendix C.
Watson won’t allow that I know anything of art, but that is mere jealousy, because our views upon the subject differ.
[Doyle, 1902]
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Emch, G.G., Liu, C. (2002). Modern Probability: Competing Semantics. In: The Logic of Thermostatistical Physics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04886-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04886-3_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07462-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-04886-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive