Corporate Reform in Russia and the Former Soviet Union: The First Ten Years

  • Stilpon Nestor
Conference paper


The break-up of the former Soviet Union (FSU) brought a sea of change in economic organization. Central planning and command structures that had been in place for over seventy years collapsed. In some parts of the former empire, a quasi-centralized control of resource allocation remained the norm, albeit on a much smaller scale and with different goals to serve than the previous socialist state. In many other parts, including Russia, the break-up of the central command structures was seen as the seed for creating a market economy.


Foreign Direct Investment Corporate Governance Cash Flow Joint Stock Company Former Soviet Union 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baker and McKenzie (1999), “Doing Business in Kyrgyzstan” (mimeo).Google Scholar
  2. Black, Bernard, Reinier Kraakman, and Anna Tarassova (2000), “Russian Privatization and Corporate Governance: What Went Wrong?” paper available at Scholar
  3. Boycko, Maxim, Andrei Schleifer, and Robert Vishny (1995), Privatizing Russia (Boston: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  4. Broadman, Harry (2000), “Reducing Structural Dominance and Entry Barriers in Russian Industry,” World Bank (mimeo).Google Scholar
  5. Brown, Scott (2000), “Tender procedure for the purchase of blocks of shares of stock in open joint stock companies,” in Russia/Central Europe Executive Guide, August 15, 2000.Google Scholar
  6. Cadogan Financial (1999), “Kazakhstan Country Survey,” London.Google Scholar
  7. De Soto, Hernando (2000), The Mystery of Capital (Bantam Press).Google Scholar
  8. Djankov, Simeon, and Peter Murrell (2000), “The Determinants of Enterprise Restructuring in Transition: an Assessment of the Evidence,” World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) (2000), 1999 Transition Report, London.Google Scholar
  10. Fox, Merritt, and Joseph Heller (1999), “Lessons from Fiascos in Russian Corporate Governance,” paper available at Scholar
  11. Freeland, Chrystia (2000), Sale of the Century: Russia’s Wild Ride from Communism to Capitalism (New York: Crown Publishers).Google Scholar
  12. Hansmann, Harry, and Reinier Kraakman (2000), “The Essential Role of Organisational Law,” paper available at Scholar
  13. Lieberman, Ira, Stilpon Nestor, and Raj Desai (1997), Between State and Market: Mass Privatization in Transition Economies, World Bank.Google Scholar
  14. McKinsey Global Institute (1999), “Unlocking Economic Growth in Russia,” Moscow.Google Scholar
  15. McKinsey Investor Opinion Survey (2000), available at Scholar
  16. Monks, Robert A.G. (2001), “The New Global Investors: How Shareowners Can Unlock Sustainable Prosperity World Wide” (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  17. Nellis, John (1999), “Time to Rethink Privatization in Transition Economies?” in Finance and Development (June 1999).Google Scholar
  18. Nestor, Stilpon, and Scott Thomas (1995), “Systemic Privatization in East-Central Europe,” in East-Central European Economies in Transition, ed. by John Hard and Richard Caufman (New York: M.E. Sharp).Google Scholar
  19. Nestor, Stilpon (1996), “Insolvency Procedures in Transition Economies,” in Emerging Financial Markets and the Role of International Financial Institutions, ed. by Joseph Norton and Mats Andenas (London: Kulwer).Google Scholar
  20. Nestor, Stilpon (2000), “Legal and Institutional Reform in European Transition Economies,” in Turkey and Central and Eastern Europe in Transition, ed. by Togan Subidey and V.N. Balasubramanyan (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  21. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (1991), A Study of the Soviet Economy.Google Scholar
  22. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2000), Economic Survey of the Russian Federation, Paris.Google Scholar
  23. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2001), “Company Law Reform in OECD member-countries” (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  24. Pistor, Katharina, and Andrew Spicer (1997), “Investment Funds in Mass Privatization and Beyond,” in Between State and Market: Mass Privatization in Transition Economies, ed. by Ira Lieberman, Stilpon Nestor, and Raj Desai, World Bank.Google Scholar
  25. Pistor, Katharina, Martin Reiser, and Stanislaw Gelfer (2000), “Law and Finance in Transition Economies,” in Economies in Transition, Vol. 8 (2).Google Scholar
  26. Radigyn, Alexander (2000), “Ownership and Control of the Russian Industry,” paper presented at 2000 OECD Roundtable on Corporate Governance, available at Scholar
  27. Reynolds, Sarah (1999), “Introduction,” in Review of Central and Eastern European Law, Vol. 25, 1–2.Google Scholar
  28. Ryvkina, Rozalina (1998), “What Kind of Capitalism is Being Created in Russia,” in Russian Policy and Law, May/June 1998.Google Scholar
  29. Shkurupiy, Konstantyn (2000), “Corporate Ownership and Control Structure in the Ukraine,” paper presented at the first Eurasian Corporate Governance Roundtable, available at Scholar
  30. Stiglitz, Joseph (1999), “Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?: Corporate Governance Failures in the Transition,” paper presented at the Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics.Google Scholar
  31. Williamson, Oliver (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
  32. World Bank (2000), “Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan: a Tale of Two Transition Paths,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 2472.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stilpon Nestor

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations