Heinrich Hertz was the first to introduce the concept of a symbol to characterize physical knowledge. He invoked this concept to highlight the fact that physical theories are not mere copies of nature. They contain a considerable constructive element. As it will turn out the use of idealizations sustains Hertz’s claim.
KeywordsPhysical System Narrow Sense Faithful Representation Compound System Amorphous Solid
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Ashcroft, N.W. and Mermin, N.D. (1976): Solid State Physics (HRW International Editions, Philadelphia) .Google Scholar
- Broad, C.D. (1925): The Mind and its Place in Nature (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London) .Google Scholar
- Ellis, B. (1992): “Idealization in Science” in: Idealization IV: Intelligibility in Science, edited by C. Dilworth (Rodopi, Amsterdam), pp. 265–282.Google Scholar
- Goldenfeld, N. (1992): Lectures on Phase Transitions and the Renormalization Group (Addison Wesley, Reading Mass.) .Google Scholar
- Hacking, I. (1983): Representing and Intervening (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) .Google Scholar
- Harré, R. (1989): “Idealization in Scientific Practice” in: Poznán Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, 16, (Rodopi, Amsterdam), pp. 183–191.Google Scholar
- Hunklinger, S. (1986): “Low Temperature Experiments on Glasses” in J.L. van Hemmen; I. Morgenstern, Lecture Notes in Physics, 275, (Springer, Heidelberg) pp. 94–120.Google Scholar
- Hüttemann, A and Terzidis, O. (2000): “Emergence in Physics” in: International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14, (Carfax Publishing, Abingdon): pp. 267–281.Google Scholar
- Laymon, R.: “The Path from Data to Theory” in: Leplin, J. (ed.) (1984): Scientific Realism, (University of California Press, Berkeley), pp. 108–123.Google Scholar