Skip to main content

The Semiotics of “Postmodern” Physics

  • Chapter

Abstract

Where does modern physics end? Where does postmodern physics start? The adjective “postmodern” has very special connotations of a new age, different from the previous modern age. Indeed the opinion is expressed that modern physics characterized by the emergence of quantum mechanics and its application to all aspects of microscopic phenomena may be terminating. J. Horgan has given an account of this endzeit in his recent book The End of Science (Horgan, 1996) . He describes his encounters with great physicists of our times, who give evidence for his hypothesis: “If one believes in science, one must accept the possibility—even the probability that the great era of scientific discovery is over. By science I mean not applied science, but science at its purest and grandest, the primordial human quest to understand the universe and our place in it. Further research may yield no more great revelations or revolutions, but only incremental, diminishing returns.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, P. (1972): Science 393, August

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1972): Myth Today, Mythologies (Jonathan Cape Ltd., London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beller, M. (1998): The Sokal Hoax, At Whom Are We Laughing? Physics Today, September, pp. 29–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E. (1994): Philosophie der Symbolischen Formen, Vols. I & III (Wiss. Buchges., Darmstadt)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosch, H.G. (1997): The Concept of Sign and Symbol in the Work of Herman Helmholtz and Heinrich Hertz, Etudes de Lettres, 1–2, pp. 54–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J.W. (1968): Principles of Systems (Wright-Allen Press, Cambridge, Mass.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopfield, J.J. (1982): Neural Networks and Physical Systems with Emergent Computational Abilities, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79, p. 2554

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, J. (1996): The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age (Addison-Wesley Pub., Reading, Mass.)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, H. (1894): Die Prinzipien der Mechanik (Akademische Verlagsanstalt, Leipzig)

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, L., Sander, C. (1996): Mapping the Protein Universe, Science 273, p. 505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack, G. (1994): Gauge Theory of Things Alive and Universal Dynamics, heplat/9411059

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadow, D.L., Meadows, D.H. (1974): The Limits to Growth, Vol. III (Universe Books, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagels, H.R. (1989): The Dreams of Reason, The Computer and the Sciences of Complexity (Simon and Schuster, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parisi, G. (1988): On Complexity, Measures of Complexity, ed. by Peliti, L., Vulpiani, A. (Springer, Berlin)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parisi, G. (1994): Complexity in Biology: The Point of View of a Physicist, condmat/94120818

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S. (1993): Syllabus of Certain Topics of Logic (Phänomen und Logik der Zeichen), transl. by H. Pape (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, C.S. (1986): Semiotische Schriften, Vols. I–III, ed. by Kloesel, C. (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirner, H.J. (1990): Wie und Warum Verändern sich Zeichensysteme? Das Beispiel der Quantenphysik (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  • Polchinski, J. (1998): Quantum Gravity at the Planck Length, Lectures Presented at the 1998 SLAC Summer Institute, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 14: 2633–2658 (1999); hep-th/9812104

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • de Rosnay, J. (1975): Le Macroscope vers une Vision Globale (Editions du Seuil, Paris)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1973): Segno (Istituto Editoriale Internationale, Milano)

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (1990): Le Contrat Naturel (Editions François Bourin, Paris), p. 68

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, A. (1996): Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity, Social Text 46–47, pp. 217–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pirner, H.J. (2002). The Semiotics of “Postmodern” Physics. In: Ferrari, M., Stamatescu, IO. (eds) Symbol and Physical Knowledge. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04855-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04855-9_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07474-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-04855-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics