The Semiotics of “Postmodern” Physics

  • Hans J. Pirner


Where does modern physics end? Where does postmodern physics start? The adjective “postmodern” has very special connotations of a new age, different from the previous modern age. Indeed the opinion is expressed that modern physics characterized by the emergence of quantum mechanics and its application to all aspects of microscopic phenomena may be terminating. J. Horgan has given an account of this endzeit in his recent book The End of Science (Horgan, 1996) . He describes his encounters with great physicists of our times, who give evidence for his hypothesis: “If one believes in science, one must accept the possibility—even the probability that the great era of scientific discovery is over. By science I mean not applied science, but science at its purest and grandest, the primordial human quest to understand the universe and our place in it. Further research may yield no more great revelations or revolutions, but only incremental, diminishing returns.”


Black Hole Turing Machine Modern Physic Quantum Chromo Dynamic Fine Structure Constant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, P. (1972): Science 393, AugustGoogle Scholar
  2. Barthes, R. (1972): Myth Today, Mythologies (Jonathan Cape Ltd., London)Google Scholar
  3. Beller, M. (1998): The Sokal Hoax, At Whom Are We Laughing? Physics Today, September, pp. 29–34Google Scholar
  4. Cassirer, E. (1994): Philosophie der Symbolischen Formen, Vols. I & III (Wiss. Buchges., Darmstadt)Google Scholar
  5. Dosch, H.G. (1997): The Concept of Sign and Symbol in the Work of Herman Helmholtz and Heinrich Hertz, Etudes de Lettres, 1–2, pp. 54–61Google Scholar
  6. Forrester, J.W. (1968): Principles of Systems (Wright-Allen Press, Cambridge, Mass.)Google Scholar
  7. Hopfield, J.J. (1982): Neural Networks and Physical Systems with Emergent Computational Abilities, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79, p. 2554MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Horgan, J. (1996): The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age (Addison-Wesley Pub., Reading, Mass.)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Hertz, H. (1894): Die Prinzipien der Mechanik (Akademische Verlagsanstalt, Leipzig)Google Scholar
  10. Holm, L., Sander, C. (1996): Mapping the Protein Universe, Science 273, p. 505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mack, G. (1994): Gauge Theory of Things Alive and Universal Dynamics, heplat/9411059Google Scholar
  12. Meadow, D.L., Meadows, D.H. (1974): The Limits to Growth, Vol. III (Universe Books, New York)Google Scholar
  13. Pagels, H.R. (1989): The Dreams of Reason, The Computer and the Sciences of Complexity (Simon and Schuster, New York)Google Scholar
  14. Parisi, G. (1988): On Complexity, Measures of Complexity, ed. by Peliti, L., Vulpiani, A. (Springer, Berlin)Google Scholar
  15. Parisi, G. (1994): Complexity in Biology: The Point of View of a Physicist, condmat/94120818Google Scholar
  16. Peirce, C.S. (1993): Syllabus of Certain Topics of Logic (Phänomen und Logik der Zeichen), transl. by H. Pape (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt)Google Scholar
  17. Pierce, C.S. (1986): Semiotische Schriften, Vols. I–III, ed. by Kloesel, C. (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt)Google Scholar
  18. Pirner, H.J. (1990): Wie und Warum Verändern sich Zeichensysteme? Das Beispiel der Quantenphysik (unpublished)Google Scholar
  19. Polchinski, J. (1998): Quantum Gravity at the Planck Length, Lectures Presented at the 1998 SLAC Summer Institute, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 14: 2633–2658 (1999); hep-th/9812104MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. de Rosnay, J. (1975): Le Macroscope vers une Vision Globale (Editions du Seuil, Paris)Google Scholar
  21. Eco, U. (1973): Segno (Istituto Editoriale Internationale, Milano)Google Scholar
  22. Serres, M. (1990): Le Contrat Naturel (Editions François Bourin, Paris), p. 68Google Scholar
  23. Sokal, A. (1996): Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity, Social Text 46–47, pp. 217–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans J. Pirner

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations