Aliasing Error Modelling in Single-Input Single-Output Linear Estimation Systems

  • C. Kotsakis
  • M. G. Sideris
Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 123)

Abstract

The problem of modelling the aliasing error in single-input single-output (SISO) linear systems with gridded input data is studied. First, a general linear estimation framework for SISO systems, based on the use of a multiresolution reference scaling kernel, is established, which includes the usual FFT-based numerical approximation of geodetic convolution integrals as a special case. The output signal error is modelled with the help of a spatio-statistical parameter (sampling phase) that depends on the resolution of the input data grid. A frequency domain algorithm is then developed which computes the decay rate of a certain output error functional with respect to the data resolution level, using the power spectra of the input signal, the chosen scaling estimation kernel, and the theoretic convolution kernel of the linear system. A simple numerical experiment is also included to compare the accuracy of the classic FFT approach in SISO approximation problems against the proposed generalization that utilizes an arbitrary reference scaling kernel.

Keywords

Covariance Convolution Lution Tated Geophysics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blu T, Unser M (1999) Quantitative Fourier analysis of approximation techniques: Part I (Interpolators and Projectors) and Part II (Wavelets). IEEE Trans. Signal Proc, 47(10): 2783–2806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kotsakis C (2000a) The multiresolution character of collocation. J. Geod, 74(3–4): 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kotsakis C (2000b) Multiresolution aspects of linear approximation methods in Hilbert spaces using gridded data. UCGE Report No. 20138, Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.Google Scholar
  4. Moritz H (1980) Advanced Physical Geodesy. Herbert Wichmann Verlag, Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
  5. Sansò F (1980) The minimum mean square estimation error principle in physical geodesy (stochastic and non-stochastic interpretation). Boll. Geod. Sci. Affi., 39(2): 111–129.Google Scholar
  6. Sideris MG (1994) Geoid determination by FFT techniques. Lecture notes for the International School on the Determination and Use of the Geoid. International Geoid Service (IGeS), DIIAR, Milan, Italy.Google Scholar
  7. Sideris MG (1995) On the use of heterogeneous noisy data in spectral gravity field modelling methods. J. Geod., 70: 470–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Unser M (1999) Splines: a perfect fit for signal/image processing. IEEE SP Magazine. 16(6): 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Unser M (2000) Sampling — 50 years after Shannon. IEEE Proc, 88(4): 569–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Unser M, Daubechies I (1997) On the approximation power of convolution-based least squares versus interpolation. IEEE Trans. Signal Proc, 47(7): 1697–1711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Kotsakis
    • 1
  • M. G. Sideris
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geomatics EngineeringUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations