Abstract
In terms of the categories used to classify the world’s political systems, Brazil usually occupies a middle position. Economically, for example, Brazil is often classified as a newly industrializing country, between the wealthier, increasingly postindustrial countries and the poorer agrarian economies. Politically, Brazil is a new liberal democracy, having returned to civilian rule in 1985 after a period of military rule. As such it shares some characteristics with the established liberal democracies, but also with less liberal regions. The key to understanding Brazil, however, is to realize that it reaches these middle positions by embodying opposite extremes simultaneously, and not by actually occupying a single, average position. Brazilians themselves sometimes call their country “Belgia,” half Belgium and half India, in one country. Thus, Brazil’s per capita income, which places it between the richest and poorest countries of the world, hides the fact that many Brazilians are among the world’s poorest while a few are among the richest. The newly industrializing economy is actually a dual economy, which has extensive industrial enterprises — and the largest remaining tropical forests in the world. The new liberal democracy carries substantial authoritarian legacies from the previous regime, which itself had liberal elements.
Early stages of the research for this chapter in 1989–1991 were funded by the Institute for the Study of World Politics, the Midwest Universities’ Consortium on International Affairs, and a MacArthur Pre-Dissertation Grant. Research in 1996 was supported by the Professional Development Fund of the College of Liberal Arts, Colorado State University. I would like to thank Helge Jörgens for helpful comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript. Any remaining errors of fact and interpretation are, of course, my own.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ames, B., and M. Keck, 1997–98. The Politics of Sustainable Development: Environmental Policy Making in Four Brazilian States. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 39 (4),1–40.
Anderson, L. E., 1996. The Causes of Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Environment and Development 5 (3), 309–328.
Bramble, B. J., and G. Porter. 1992. Non-Governmental Organizations and the Making of US International Environmental Policy, in: A. Burrell and B. Kingsbury (eds.), The International Politics of the Environment. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press/Clarendon Press.
Brazilian NGO Forum, 1997. National Consultation Process of Brazilian NGOs and Social Movements for the Rio+5 Forum.
Caccia Bava, S., and L. Mullahy, 1995. Making Cities Livable: Local Initiatives in Solid Waste and Public Transportation Management in Brazil, in: C. A. Reilly (ed.), New Paths to Democratic Development in Latin America: The Rise of NGO-Municipal Collaboration. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Campanilli, M., and S. Leitâo, 1998. Conama Facilita Licenciamento Ambiental. Parab6licas 37.
Capobianco, J. P., 1998. Rio é o Campeâo Nacional do Desmatamento. Journal do Meio Ambiente, < http://www.jornal-do-meio-ambiente.com.beindex.htm> (July).
Comissao Pastoral da Terra, 1993. O Campo Brasileiro em 1992. Cadernos do CEAS 148, 76–84.
Conama, 1991. Resoluçôes Conama 1984 à 1990. Brasilia: Secretaria do Meio Ambiente da Presidência da Repuiblica.
Dean, W., 1995. With Broadax and Firebrand: The Destruction of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Dimenstein, G., 1996. Democracia em Pedacos — Direitos Humanos no Brasil. Sao Paulo: Cornpanhia das Letras.
Earthwatch, 1992. Urban Air Pollution in Magacities of the World. New York: WHO/UNEP/ Blackwell Reference.
Escola Superior de Guerra, 1990. Estructura do Poder Nacional para o Ano 2001. Rio de Janeiro: Escola Superior de Guerra.
Feamside, P. M., and R. I. Barbosa, 1996a. The Cotingo Darn as a Test of Brazil’s System for Evaluating Proposed Developments in Amazonia. Environmental Management 20 (5), 631–648.
Fearnside, P. M., and R. I. Barbosa, 1996b. Political Benefits as Barriers to Assessment of Environmental Costs in Brazil’s Amazonian Development Planning: The Example of the Jatapu Dam in Roraima. Environmental Management 20 (5), 615–630.
Fernandes, E., 1995. Law and Urban Change in Brazil. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.
Financial Resources for Biodiversity Conservation, 1997. Environmental Policy and Law 27 (1), 9–13.
Fischer, G. R., 1999. Carta - Alerta para os Ambientalistas. Jornal do Ambiente 41.
Flynn, P., 1996. Brazil: The Politics of the `Plano Real’. Third World Quarterly 17 (3), 401–426.
Foresta, R. A., 1991. Amazon Conservation in the Age of Development: The Limits of Providence. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.
Fuks, M., 1994. Theoretical and Practical Considerations on Environment-Related Litigation. International Sociology 9 (4), 447–462.
Gentry, B. S., 1998. Agriculture - Cases from Brazil and Costa Rica, in: B. S. Gentry (ed.), Private Capital Flows and the Environment: Lessons from Latin America.. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Gilbert, A., 1996. Land, Housing, and Infrastructure in Latin America’s Major Cities, in: A. Gilbert (ed.) The Mega-City in Latin America. New York: United Nations University Press.
Government of São Paulo, 1987. A Batalha do Meio Ambiente no Governo Montoro. São Paulo: State of São Paulo.
Guimaräes, R. P., 1992. Development Pattern and Environment in Brazil. CEPAL Review 47, 47–62.
Guimaräes, R. P., 1995. The Ecopolitics of Development in the Third World: Politics and Environment in Brazil. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Gutberlet, J., and D. S. Baena Segura., 1996/97. Tendências de Gerenciamento Ambiental nas Indüstrias Brasileiras. Debates Soci Ambientais 2 (5), 26–28.
Hall, A., 1997. Sustaining Amazonia: Grassroots Action for Productive Conservation. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
Hecht, S., and A. Cockburn, 1990. The Fate of the Forest: Developers, Destroyers and Defenders of the Amazon. New York: HarperCollins.
Hinchberger, B., 1998. Brazil Overhauls its Environmental Laws. EcoAméricas 1 (1), 3.
Hochstetler, K., 1997. The Evolution of the Brazilian Environmental Movement and Its Political Roles, in: D. A. Chalmers, C. M. Vilas, K. Hite, S. B. Martin, K. Piester and M. Segarra (eds.), The New Politics of Inequality in Latin America: Rethinking Participation and Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hochstetler, K., forthcoming. Democratizing Pressures from Below? Social Movements in New Brazilian Democracy, in: P. R. Kingstone and T. J. Power (eds.), Democratic Brazil: Actors, Institutions, and Processes,edited by. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Hodge, S. S., M. Hering de Queiroz, and A Reis, 1997. Brazil’s National Atlantic Forest Policy: A Challenge for State-Level Environmental Planning. The Case of Santa Catarina, Brazil. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 40 (3), 335–348.
Holston, J., and T. P.R. Caldeira, 1998. Democracy, Law, and Violence: Disjunctions of Brazilian Citizenship, in: by F. Agiiero and J. Stark (eds.), Fault Lines of Democracy in Post-Transition Latin America. Miami: North-South Center Press.
Hurrell, A., 1992. Brazil and the International Politics of Amazonian Deforestation, in: A. Hurrell and B. Kingsbury (eds.), The International Politics of the Environment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Jacobi, P., 1993. A Percepçäo de Problemas Ambientais Urbanos em Sao Paulo. Lua Nova 31, 47–56.
Jänicke, M., 1997. The Political System’s Capacity for Environmental Policy, in: M. Jänicke and H. Weidner (eds.), National Environmental Policies: A Comparative Study of Capacity Building. Berlin and New York: Springer.
Keck, M., 1995. Social Equity and Environmental Politics in Brazil: Lessons from the Rubber Tappers of Acre. Comparative Politics 27 (4), 409–424.
Kepp, M., 1999. Brazil’s Environment Budget to Take a Hit. EcoAméricas 1 (3), 4.
Kolk, A., 1996. Forests in International Environmental Politics: International Organisations, NGOs and the Brazilian Amazon. Netherlands: International Books.
Kolk, A., 1998. From Conflict to Cooperation: International Policies to Protect the Brazilian Amazon. World Development 26 (8), 1481–1493.
Lamounier, B., 1996. Brazil: The Hyperactive Paralysis Syndrome, in: J. I. Dominguez and A. F. Lowenthal (eds.) Constructing Democratic Governance: South America in the 1990s. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lemos, M. C. de M., 1998. The Cubatäo Pollution Control Project: Popular Participation and Public Accountability. Journal of Environment and Development 7 (1), 60–76.
Lewis, S., 1990. The Rainforest Book: How You Can Save the World’s Rainforests. Venice, CA: Living Planet Press.
Lopes, J. B., 1996. Obstacles to Economic Reform in Brazil, in: A. Lijphart and C. H. Waisman (eds.), Institutional Design in New Democracies: Eastern Europe and Latin America. Boulder: Westview.
Mahar, D. J., 1989. Government Policies and Deforestation in Brazil’s Amazon Region. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Martine, G., and C. Campolina Diniz, 1997. Economic and Demographic Concentration in Brazil: Recent Inversion of Historical Patterns, in: G. W. Jones and P. Visaria (eds.), Urbanization in Large Developing Countries: China, Indonesia, Brazil, and India,. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Martinez-Lara, J.., 1996. Building Democracy in Brazil: The Politics of Constitutional Change, 1985–93. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
May, P., and V. Gonçalves da Vinha, 1998. Financing Expansion of Brazil’s Pulp and Paper Industry, in: B. S. Gentry (ed.), Private Capital Flows and the Environment: Lessons from Latin America. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Ministério de Meio Ambiente, 1995. Protocolo Verde 1995. Brasilia: Ministério de Meio Ambiente.
Nepstad, D. C., A. Verissimo, A. Alencar, C. Nobre, E. Lima, P. Lefebvre, P. Schlesinger, C. Potter, P. Motinho, E. Mendoza, M. Cochrane, and V. Brooks, 1999. Large-scale Impoverishment of Amazonian Forests by Logging and Fire. Nature 398 (April 8), 505–508.
Padua, J. A., 1991. O Nascimento da Politica Verde no Brasil: Fatores Exégenos e Endôgenos, in: H. Leis (ed.), Ecologia e Politica Mundial. Rio de Janeiro: FASE, Editora Vozes, and AIRI/PUC-Rio.
Redwood III, J., 1993. World Bank Approaches to the Environment in Brazil, A World Bank Operations Evaluation Study. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Republic of Brazil, 1991. Meio Ambiente (Legislaçâo). Brasilia: Senado Federal.
Republic of Brazil, 1995. Relatorio Brasil: Sobre os Assentamentos Humanos. Brasilia: Itamaraty.
Republic of Brazil, 1997. Brazil: Country Profile: Implementation of Agenda 21: Review of Progress Made Since the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, 1992. Brasilia: Republic of Brazil.
Roberts, J. T., 1998. The End of `Pollution Haven’ as `Comparative Advantage’? Emerging International Environmental Standards and the Brazilian Chemical Industry. Paper read at Space, Place, and Nation: Reconstructing Neo-Liberalism in the Americas, at University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Romanini, V., 1995.0 Fantasma de Cubatäo. Problemas Brasileiras 307, 34–40.
Santilli, J., 1998a. Meio Ambiente: Vitdrias no Judicihrio. Parabolicas 36.
Santilli, J., 1998b. Multas por dans ambientais se perdem na burocracia. Parabolicas 38.
Santos, J. V. T. dos, 1992. Violencia no Campo: O Dilaceramento da Cidadania. Reforma Agraria 22 (1), 4–11.
Selcher, W. A., 1998. The Politics of Decentralized Federalism, National Diversification, and Regionalism in Brazil. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 40 (4), 25–50.
Silva, E., 1997. Chile, in: M. Jänicke and H. Weidner (eds.), National Environmental Policies: A Comparative Study of Capacity-Building. Berlin and New York: Springer.
SOS Mata Atlântica, 1993. Atlas da Evoluçâo dos Remanescentes da Mata Atlântica. Sao Paulo: SOS Mata Atlântica.
Souza, C., 1997. Constitutional Engineering in Brazil: The Politics of Federalism and Decentralization. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Teixeira, M. A. C., 1996/97. Sao Paulo e as Alternativas de Tratamento e Distinaçâo Final do Lixo. Debates Sôcio Ambientais 2 (5), 17–18.
UNEP, 1993. Environmental Data Report 1993–94. London: Blackwell Reference.
Viana, G., 1996/1997. A Atuaçâo da Comissâo do Consumidor, Meio Ambiente e Minorias. Debates Sdcio Ambientais 2 (5), 21–22.
Wainer, A. H.. 1991. Legislaçâo Ambiental Brasileira: Subsidios para a Historia do Direito Ambiental. Rio de Janeiro: Forense.
Woreman, N. B., 1990. Brazil’s Thriving Environmental Movement. Technology Review 93 (7), 42–47.
Zirker, D., and M. Henberg, 1994. Amazônia: Democracy, Ecology, and Brazilian Military Prerogatives in the 1990s. Armed Forces and Society 20 (2), 259–281.
Zulauf, W., 1994. Brasil Ambiental: Sindromes e Potencialidades. São Paulo: Fundaçâo KonradAdenauer-Stiftung.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hochstetler, K. (2002). Brazil. In: Weidner, H., Jänicke, M. (eds) Capacity Building in National Environmental Policy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04794-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04794-1_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07732-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-04794-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive