Abstract

New Zealanders pride themselves on the natural beauty of their country. Uninhabited by humans until about 700–800 years ago, with its majestic mountains and volcanoes, sparkling rivers and streams, splendid coasts, extensive natural forests, and scenic landscapes, the country is sometimes referred to as “God’s own”. This beautiful, almost pristine, and “clean and green” image is a carefully cultivated part of New Zealand’s identity, and an important economic asset.

Keywords

Fatigue Methane Ozone Income Sewage 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Australian Social Science Data Archives, 1998. New Zealand Election Studies (1990, 1993 and 1996 ). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
  2. Boston, J., 1991. The Theoretical Underpinnings of Public Sector Restructuring in New Zealand, in: J. Boston, J. Martin, J. Pallot, and P. Walsh (eds.), Reshaping the State. New Zealand’s Bureaucratic Revolution. Auckland: Oxford University Press, 1–26.Google Scholar
  3. Boston, J.. J. Martin, J. Pallot, and P. Walsh, 1996. Public Management: The New Zealand Model. Auckland: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bührs, T., 1991a. Working Within Limits. The Role of the Commission for the Environment in Environmental Policy Development in New Zealand. PhD thesis. Auckland: University of Auckland.Google Scholar
  5. Bührs, T., 1991b. Strategies for Environmental Policy Co-ordination: The New Zealand Experience, Political Science 43 (2), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bührs, T., 1996. Barking Up Which Trees? The Role Of New Zealand’s Environmental Watchdog. Political Science 48 (1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bührs, T., 1997. Environmental Policy, in: Raymond Miller (ed.), New Zealand Politics in Transition. Auckland: Oxford University Press, 287–295.Google Scholar
  8. Bührs, T., and R. V. Bartlett, 1993. Environmental Policy in New Zealand. The Politics of Clean and Green Auckland: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bührs, T., and R. V. Bartlett, 1997. Strategic Thinking and the Environment: Planning the Future in New Zealand?. Environmental Politics 6 (2), 72–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapple, G., 1995. Scandal at Cave Creek. Listener. June 3, 16–24.Google Scholar
  11. Commission for the Environment, 1984. A Guide to Environmental Law in New Zealand. Wellington: Commission for the Environment.Google Scholar
  12. Dann, C., 1997. Green Genesis: The Origins and Development of Green Politics (in Aotearoa New Zealand). Ph.D. thesis (draft). Canterbury: Department of Resource Management, Lincoln University.Google Scholar
  13. Grundy, K.-J., 1994. Public Planning in a Market Economy. Planning Quarterly 114, 20–24. Hawke, G. (ed.), 1997. Guardians for the Environment. Wellington: Institute of Policy Studies. Kelsey, J., 1996. The New Zealand Experiment. A World Model for Structural Change Auckland: Auckland University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Law, G., 1996. Business Proves Slow To Come Clean. Management 43 (11), 107–110.Google Scholar
  15. Lundqvist, L. J., 1997. Sweden, in: M. Jänicke, and H. Weidner (eds.), National Environmental Policies. A Comparative Study of Capacity-Building. Berlin: Springer, 45–71.Google Scholar
  16. May, P. J., 1997. The Mandate for Planning: An Outsider’s Perspective Concerning the Resource Management Act. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the New Zealand Planning Institute, 16–18 April 1997, Palmerston North, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  17. Memon, A.,1993. Keeping New Zealand Green. Recent Environmental Reforms. Dunedin: University of Otago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Miller, R., 1991. Postmaterialism and Green Party Activists in New Zealand. Political Science. 43 (2), 43–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Milne, C. D. A. (ed.), 1992. Handbook of Environmental Law. Wellington: Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society.Google Scholar
  20. Ministry for the Environment, 1995. Environment 2010 Strategy: A Statement of the Government’s Strategy on the Environment. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.Google Scholar
  21. Ministry for the Environment, 1996. National Environmental Indicators: Building a Framework for a Core Set. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.Google Scholar
  22. Ministry for the Environment, 1997a. The State of New Zealand’s Environment 1997. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.Google Scholar
  23. Ministry for the Environment. 1997b. Environmental Performance Indicators. Proposals for Air, Fresh Water and Land. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, 1996. Environmental Performance Reviews. New Zealand. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  24. The Press, 1997. Poor Environmental Score by NZ. 30 April 1997.Google Scholar
  25. Vowles, J., and P. Aimer, 1993.. Voters’ Vengeance. The 1990 Election in New Zealand and the Fate of the Fourth Labour Government. Auckland: Auckland University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Williams, D. A. R., 1980. Environmental Law. Wellington: Butterworth.Google Scholar
  27. Acknowledgement: My thanks to Susan Banducci of the Department of Political Studies of Waikato University for digging out the data on public opinion on environmental issues from the Australian Social Science Data Archives.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ton Bührs

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations