EMU and the Industrial Specialisation of European Regions

  • Christiane Krieger-Boden
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

The European Monetary Union (EMU) is a major institutional reform that substantially changes economic relations in the participating countries and their respective regions. EMU will deeply influence the division of labour and, hence, the spatial location of industries and the specialisation of regions. Regional specialisation, in turn, will affect the susceptibility of regions to asymmetric shocks, and the core-periphery divide of regional incomes, and will thus determine the impact of EMU on European regions. This raises the question whether all European regions will participate in the expected welfare benefits to a similar degree. Potentially, the integration process could also entail an increased instability of regional development and rising divergence of regional incomes such that there might be winners and losers of the integration process.

Keywords

Migration Depression Europe Transportation Income 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amiti, M. (1999). Specialisation Patterns in Europe. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 135: 1–21. Artis, M. J., and W. Zhang (1997). International Business Cycles and the ERM: Is There a European Business Cycle? International Journal of Finance and Economics 2: 1–16.Google Scholar
  2. Artis, M. J., and Zhang, W. (1999). Further Evidence on the International Business Cycle and the ERM: Is There a European Business Cycle? Oxford Economic Papers 51: 120–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belke, A., and Heine, J.P. (2000). On the Endogeneity of an Exogenous OCA-Criterion: The Impact of Specialisation on the Synchronisation of Regional Business Cycles in Europe. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  4. Brülhart, M. (1998). Trading Places: Industrial Specialisation in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies. 36 (3): 319–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlino, G., Cody, B. and Voith, R. (1990). Regional Impacts of Exchange Rate Movements. Regional Science Perspectives 20 (1): 89–102.Google Scholar
  6. Carlino, G., and De Fina, R. (1998). The Differential Effects of Monetary Policy. Review of Economics and Statistics: 572–587.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, D.R., and Weinstein, D.E. (1996). Does Economic Geography Matter for International Specialisation? Working Paper 5706. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, D.R., and Weinstein, D.E. (1999). Economic Geography and Regional Production Structure: An Empirical Investigation. European Economic Review 43: 379–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Decressin, J. and Fatâs, A. (1995). Regional Labour Market Dynamics in Europe. European Economic Review, 39: 1627–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dluhosch, B. (2000). Industrial Location and Economic Integration. Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces in the New Europe. Cheltenham and Northampton.Google Scholar
  11. Ellison, G., and Glaeser, E.L. (1997). Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach. Journal of Political Economy 105 (5): 889–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Emerson, M., et al. (1990). One Market - One Money. The Economics of EMU. European Economy 44. BrüsselGoogle Scholar
  13. Esteban, J. (2000). Regional Convergence in Europe and the Industry Mix: a Shift-Share Analysis. Regional Science and Urban Economics 353–364.Google Scholar
  14. Fatâs, A. (1997). EMU: Countries or Regions? Lessons from the EMS Experience. CEPR Discussion Paper 1558. London.Google Scholar
  15. Frankel, J., and Rose, A.K. (1998). The Endogeneity of the Optimum Currency Area Criteria. Economic Journal 108: 1009–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fujita, M., Krugman, P. and Venables. A.J. (1999). The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions and International Trade. Cambridge (Mass.).Google Scholar
  17. Garcia-Mila, T., and McGuire, T. (1993). Industrial Mix as a Factor in the Growth and Variability of State’s Economies. Regional Science and Urban Economics 23: 731–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grauwe, P., and W. Vanhaverbeke (1991). Is Europe an Optimum Currency Area? Evidence from Regional Data. CEPR Discussion Paper 555.Google Scholar
  19. Hallet, M. (2000). Regional Specialisation and Concentration in the EU.Google Scholar
  20. Helg, R., Manasse, P., Monacelli, T. and Rovelli, R. (1995). How much (A)symmetry in Europe? Evidence from Industrial Sectors. Centro Studi sui Processi di Internazionalizzazion. Working Paper 82. Milano.Google Scholar
  21. Hufbauer, G.C., and Chilas, J.G. (1974). Specialisation by Industrial Countries: Extent and Consequences. In H. Giersch (ed.), The International Division of Labour. Tübingen.Google Scholar
  22. Imbs, J. (1999). Co-Fluctuations. CEPR Discussion Paper 2267. London.Google Scholar
  23. Imbs, J. (2000). Sectors and the OECD Business Cycle. CEPR Discussion Paper 2473. London.Google Scholar
  24. Junius, K. (1999). The Economic Geography of Production, Trade and Development. Kieler Studie 300. Tübingen.Google Scholar
  25. Krieger, C., Thoroe, C. and Weskamp, W. (1985). Regionales Wirtschaftswachstum und sektoraler Strukturwandel in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft. Kieler Studien 194. Tübingen.Google Scholar
  26. Krieger-Boden, C. (1999). Nationale und regionale Spezialisierungsmuster im eu-ro-päischen Vergleich. Die Weltwirtschaft 1999 (2): 234–254.Google Scholar
  27. Krieger-Boden, C. (2000). Globalization, Integration and Regional Specialisation. Kiel Working Paper 1009. Kiel.Google Scholar
  28. Krugman, P. (1991) Geography and Trade. Leuven.Google Scholar
  29. Krugman, P. (1993). Lessons of Massachusetts for EMU. In F. Torres, F. Giavazzi (Hrsg.), Adjustment and Growth in the European Monetary Union. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  30. Krugman, P. (1998). What’s New about the New Economic Geography? Oxford Review of Economic Policy 14 (2): 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krugman, P., and Venables, A.J. (1995). Globalization and the Inequality of Nations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (4): 857–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Markusen, J., and Venables, A.J. (1999), Foreign direct investment as a catalyst for industrial development, European Economic Review, 43: 335–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maurel, F., and Sédillot, B. (1999). A Measure of the Geographic Concentration in French Manufacturing Industries. Regional Science and Urban Economics 29: 575–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mauro, P., Prasad, E. and Spilimbergo, A. (1999), Perspectives on Regional Unemployment in Europe. International Monetary Fund (ed.), IMF Occasional Paper 177. Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  35. Middelfart-Knarvig, K.H., Overman, H.G., Redding, S.J. and Venables, A.J. (2000). The Location of European Industry. Report prepared to the Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs, European Commission. Economic Papers 142, ECFIN/318/00-EN.Google Scholar
  36. Milton, A.-R. (1994). Zur Wechselkursempfindlichkeit der Ausfuhren Nordrhein-Westfalens und Baden-Württembergs. RWI-Mitteilungen 43 (1): 17–38.Google Scholar
  37. Möller, J., and Tassinopoulos, A. (2000). Zunehmende Spezialisierung oder Strukturkonvergenz? Eine Analyse der sektoralen Beschäftigungsentwicklung auf regionaler Ebene. Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft 20 (1): 1–38Google Scholar
  38. Molle, W. (1980). Regional Disparity and Regional Development in the European Community. Farnborough.Google Scholar
  39. Molle, W., and Boeckhout, S. (1995). Economic Disparity under Conditions of Integration - A Long Term View of the European Case. Papers in Regional Science 74 (2): 105123.Google Scholar
  40. de Nardis, S., Goglio, A. and Malgarini, M. (1996). Regional Specialisation and Shocks in Europe: Some Evidence from Regional Data. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 132 (2): 197214.Google Scholar
  41. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). OSC-Data.Google Scholar
  42. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1987). Structural Adjustment and Economic Performance. Paris.Google Scholar
  43. Oliveira Martins, J., Scarpetta, S. and Pilat, D. (1996). Mark-up Ratios in Manufacturing Industries. Estimates for 14 OECD Countries. OECD Working Papers - Economic Department Working Papers (IV) 24. Paris.Google Scholar
  44. Ottaviano, G. I. P., and Puga, D. (1997). Agglomeration in the Global Economy: A Survey of the “New Economic Geography”. Discussion Paper 1699. Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London.Google Scholar
  45. Pratten, C. (1988). A Survey of the Economies of Scale. In Commission of the European Communities, Research on the Cost of Non-Europe. Volume 2: Studies on the Economics of Integration. Luxemburg.Google Scholar
  46. Puga, D. (1998). European regional policy in light of recent location theories. Draft http://dpuga. eco.utoronto.ca Google Scholar
  47. Puga, D. (1999). The Rise and Fall of Regional Inequalities. European Economic Review 43: 303–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ramaswamy, R., and Sloek, T. (1997). The Real Effects of Monetary Policy in the European Union: What are the Differences? IMF Working Paper 97 /160.Google Scholar
  49. Services des Statistiques Industrielle (SESSI). Enquête Annuelle d’ Entreprises. Paris. Soltwedel, R., Dohse, D. and Krieger-Boden, C. (2000). EMU Challenges to European Labour Markets. IMF World Economic Outlook. Supporting Studies. 2000: 184–210.Google Scholar
  50. Washington D.C. Venables, A.J. (1996). Equilibrium Locations of vertically linked Industries. International Economic Review 37: 341–359.Google Scholar
  51. Vinais, J., and Jimeno, J.F. (1996). Monetary Union and European Unemployment. Banco de Espana (Hrsg.), Documento de Trabajo No. 9624.Google Scholar
  52. Walz, U. (1999). Dynamics of Regional Integration. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  53. Waniek, R.W. (1995). Sektoraler und raumstruktureller Wandel in Europa. In H. Karl und W. Henrichsmeyer (Hrsg.), Regionalentwicklung im Prozeß der Europäischen Integration. Bonner Schriften zur Integration Europas 4. Bonn.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christiane Krieger-Boden
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Department III, Regional EconomicsKiel Institute of World EconomicsKielGermany

Personalised recommendations