Advertisement

The US Regional Ferrous Scrap Model

  • Frank Giarratani
  • Gene Gruver
  • Craig Richmond
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

The U.S. regional ferrous scrap model developed at the University of Pittsburgh is capable of simulating price interactions at a significant degree of geographic detail. In this model, estimates of the supply and demand for ferrous scrap in hundreds of local markets are used to estimate a set of equilibrium prices. The model can be used to simulate the impact of market changes such as new plant locations or transport rate adjustments on regional scrap prices. The analysis involved is based on realistic modeling of regional price interactions as well as careful attention to metallurgical relationships. The capability of the model provides a linkage between basic supply and demand conditions and an extensive network of regional scrap prices. Modeling simulations can be used to map price gradients across the United States based on very small county-based regions, providing useful information on spatial price differences.

Keywords

Equilibrium Price Supply Function Offer Price Basic Oxygen Furnace Spatial Price 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahlbrandt, R.S., R. Fruehan and F. Giarratani. 1996. The Renaissance of American Steel. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. American Iron and Steel Institute (Various years). Annual Statistical Report, American Iron and Steel Institute, Washington DC:Google Scholar
  3. American Metal Market (Various issues). American Metal Market, New York...Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, S. and A. de Palma. 1992a. “The Logit as a Model of Product Differentiation. Oxford Economic Papers, 44, 51–67.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, S. and A. de Palma. 1992b. Discrete choice theory of product differentiation. Cambridge, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
  6. Carload Waybill Statistics. 1989. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Railway Administration. Washington, Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  7. County Business Patterns. Various years. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. CD ROM and computer tape. Washington: Administrative and Customer Services Division.Google Scholar
  8. d’Aspremont C., J.J. Gabszewitz, and J-F. Thisse. 1979. “On Hotelling’s Stability in Competition.” Econometrica, 17, 1145–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Palma, A., V. Ginsburgh, Y.Y. Papagiorgiou, and J-F. Thisse. 1985. “The Principle of Minimum Differentiation Holds under Sufficient Heterogeneity.” Econometrica, 53, 767–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Palma, A., R. Lindsey, B. von Hohenbalken and D.S. West. 1994. “Spatial price and variety competition in an urban retail market, A nested logit analysis.” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 12, 331–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenhut, M.L., G. Norman, and C-S. Hung. 1987. The Economics of Imperfect Competition A Spatial Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. Hotelling, H. 1929. “Stability in Competition.” Economic Journal, 39, 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Iron Age: New Steel. (Various issues). Cahners Business Information, Oak Brook, IlGoogle Scholar
  14. James W. Brown Associates. 1994. U.S. Mini-Mill Feedstock Availability, Quality, and Cost Through the Year 2000. New York: Chilton Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Marley, M. 2000a. “Aluminum.com will unveil global online marketplace at ISRI.” American Metal Market, 108, No. 49, 1.Google Scholar
  16. Marley, M. 2000b. “Scrap execs differ on e-commerce.” American Metal Market, 108, No. 51, 1.Google Scholar
  17. Marley, M. 2000c. “US ferrous Exports, Role as ‘world’s largest scrap yard’ changing.” American Metal Market, Special Report: Metals Recycling, March 14, 2000, p. 2a.Google Scholar
  18. Regional Economic Information System. (Various years). CD ROM, U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Economic Analysis. Washington: Administrative and Customer Services Division.Google Scholar
  19. Richmond, C. 1997. “Simulating differences in ferrous scrap prices over geographic space using the logistic model of choice for differentiated products.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  20. Sheppard E., R. Haining, and P. Plummer. 1992. “Spatial Pricing in Interdependent Markets.” Journal of Regional Science, 32, 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Whipp, R. 1993. “A spreadsheet model for Optimizing the Scrap Mix in Electric Furnace Shops.” Iron and Steel Maker, July, 31–34.Google Scholar
  22. Worden, E. 2000. “Metal Site, other interests preparing to start up new Internet site.” American Metal Market, 108, No. 49, 1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank Giarratani
    • 1
  • Gene Gruver
    • 1
  • Craig Richmond
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.GockhausenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations