Combined Model of Interregional Commodity Flows on a Transportation Network

  • David Boyce
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)


This chapter is motivated by two ongoing research objectives of the author. The first concerns models of flows on transportation networks. Whether the subject is personal travel or freight transportation, representation of the transportation network is necessary to determine realistically interzonal/interregional travel/transportation costs. The methodological effort required to achieve such results is nontrivial, but the issues raised by such an attempt are enlightening and worthwhile. This insight is demonstrated once more by the models considered here.


Transportation Network Final Demand Census Region Link Flow Route Flow 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Batten, D.F. and D.E. Boyce. 1986. “Spatial Interaction, Transportation, and Interregional Commodity Flow Models.” In P. Nijkamp, ed. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Volume 1. Amsterdam, North-Holland, pp. 357–406.Google Scholar
  2. Boyce, D.E. and G.J.D. Hewings. 1981. “Interregional Commodity Flow, Input-Output and Transportation Modeling: An Entropy Formulation.” Prepared for the Conference on Interregional Models, First World Regional Science Congress, Cambridge, MA, 1980.Google Scholar
  3. Boyce, D.E. and M.S. Daskin. 1997. “Urban Transportation.” In C. ReVelle and A. McGarity, eds. Design and Operation of Civil and Environmental Engineering Systems. New York, John Wiley and Sons, pp. 277–341.Google Scholar
  4. Chang, E., A. Ziliaskopoulos, S.T. Waller and D.E. Boyce. 2000. “Solution Algorithm for the Combined Interregional Commodity Flow and Transportation Network Model with Link Capacity Constraints.” Working Paper, Transportation Center, Northwestern University, Evanston.Google Scholar
  5. Evans, S.P. 1976. “Derivation and Analysis of Some Models for Combining Trip Distribution and Assignment.” Transportation Research, 10, 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Isard, W. 1960. Methods of Regional Analysis. Cambridge, MA., MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Leontief, W.W. and A. Strout. 1963. “Multiregional Input-Output Analysis.” In T. Barna, ed. Structural Interdependence and Economic Development. London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. 1996. Description of the Oak Ridge National Highway Network, Version 1.3 (C), Center for Transportation Analysis., Oak Ridge, TN.Google Scholar
  9. Patriksson, M. 1994. The Traffic Assignment Problem, Models and Methods. Utrecht, VSP.Google Scholar
  10. Rho, J. H., D.E. Boyce and T.J. Kim. 1987. “Comparison of Solution Methods for Wilson’s Interregional Commodity Flow Model.” Geographical Analysis, 21, 259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sacks, J., W. Welch, T. Mitchell, and H. Wynn, 1989. “Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments.” Statistical Science, 4, 409–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wilson, A.G. 1970. “Interregional Commodity Flows: Entropy Maximizing Procedures.” Geographical Analysis, 2, 255–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Boyce
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Materials EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations