Regional Economic Modeling in Denmark: Construction of an Interregional SAM with Data at High Levels of Disaggregation, Subject to National Constraints
Philip Israilevich made significant contributions to regional economics and regional science in a number of fields. He is particularly well known for his work on structural change in regional economies (Hewings, et al., 1998, Israilevich, et al., 1997) and for his work on regional economic performance in a decision-making context (Schindler, et al., 1997). He had scientific interests in a related set of issues concerning estimation of regional input-output coefficients, embedded in an accounting framework (Israilevich, et al., 1996), and in the broader context of CGE models (Israilevich 2001). Issues related to the use of survey data and non-survey methods in the determination of input-output coefficients were important themes in his work (Jackson, et al., 1992) and in a 1991 paper (Israilevich and Hewings, 1991) he combines individual establishment-level data with non-survey based regional purchase coefficients to examine the assumption of identity between national and regional technologies underlying use of non-survey methods.
KeywordsPrivate Consumption Social Account Matrix Factor Income Interregional Trade Intermediate Consumption
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Israilevich, P.R. 2001. “Frame shifting in Regional General Equilibrium models.” Chapter 21 in this volume.Google Scholar
- Israilevich P.R., Hewings G.J.D. 1991. “Regional trade and regional structure: Implications for the construction of regional input-output models.” Unpublished manuscript, Regional Economics Applications Laboratory, Urbana, Illinois.Google Scholar
- Israilevich P.R. and E.B. Martins. 1994. “Solving the product mix problem in Input-Output: An alternative framework.” Discussion Paper 94-T-4, Regional Economics Applications Laboratory, Urbana, Illinois.Google Scholar
- Jensen-Butler C.N., B. Madsen and S. Caspersen. 1998. “Rural areas in crisis? The role of the welfare state in income creation, the case of Denmark.”. Paper presented to the 45th Annual Meeting of the Regional Science Association International, Santa Fe, New Mexico, November 1998.Google Scholar
- Madsen, B., C.N. Jensen-Butler, D. Pu and M. Johnson. 2001. “The Line Model.” Copenhagen, AKF Forlag.Google Scholar
- Round J.L. 1988. “Incorporating the international, regional and spatial dimension into a SAM: Some methods and applications.” In: F.J. Harrigan and P.G. McGregor, eds. Recent Advances in Regional Economic Modeling. Pion, London.Google Scholar