Skip to main content

A Spatial Output Decomposition Method for Assessing Regional Economic Structure

  • Chapter
Trade, Networks and Hierarchies

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

  • 297 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is dedicated to the memory of Philip Israilevich, a close friend and valued colleague, whose enthusiasm, intellectual curiosity and good nature were inspirational to all who knew him. These pages present a method for measuring and comparing economic structure, using the input-output framework as a foundation, and demonstrated using data for the Midwest economy. These topics are among the many that captured Phil’s interest and imagination throughout his career.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • “A Test of Midwest Mettle.” The Economist, April 19, 1997: 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, S.J., D. McClain, and K. Palmer K. 1987. “Sources of Structural Change in the United States, 1963 – 78: An Input-Output Perspective.” The Review Of Economics and Statistics 69, 503–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietzenbacher, E, and B. Los. 1997. “Analyzing Decomposition Analyses.” In A. Simonovits and A.E. Steenge (eds). Prices, Growth and Cycles. London, MacMillan, 108–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietzenbacher, E. and B. Los. 1998. “Structural Decomposition Techniques: Sense and Sensitivity.” Economic Systems Research, 10, 307–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietzenbacher, E. and R. Hoekstra. 2002. “The RAS Structural Decomposition Approach.” This volume, chapter 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzikowski, D.A. 1999. “Production Structure in the American Midwest: A Comparative State Analysis.” Unpublished Masters Thesis, The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewings, G. J. D., M. Sonis, J. Guo, P.R. Israilevich, and G.R. Schindler. 1998. “The Hollowing-Out Process in the Chicago Economy, 1975 – 2011.” Geographical Analysis 30, 217–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. 1958. The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven, Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israilevich, P.R., G.J.D. Hewings, and E.B. Martins. 1993 “A New Alternative to the BEA Method of Constructing Input-Output Tables.” Discussion Paper 93-T-9, Regional Economics Applications Laboratory, University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israilevich, P.R., and G.J.D. Hewings. 1998. “Interstate Trade Among Midwest Economies.” Chicago Federal Reserve Letter 129, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson R.W., G.J.D. Hewings, and M. Sonis. “Decomposition Approaches to the Identification of Change in Regional Economies.” Economic Geography 65, 216–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. 1996. “Changing Structure of U.S. Regions: A Historical Perspective.” The Midwest Economy: Structure and Performance, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melcher, R.A., D. Weimer, and P. Galuszka. 1998. “This Isn’t Your Father’s Rust Belt.” Business Week, 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, P. 1956. Studies in Inter-Sectoral Relations. Copenhagen, Einar Harks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. and S. Casler. 1996. “Input-Output Structural Decomposition Analysis: A Critical Appraisal.” Economic System Research 8, 33–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonis, M., G.J.D. Hewings, and J. Guo. 1996. “Sources of Structural Change in Input-Output Systems: A Field of Influence Approach.” Economic Systems Research 8, 15–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonis, M., G.J.D. Hewings, and J. Guo. 2000. “A New Image of Classical Key Sector Analysis: Minimum Information Decomposition of the Leontief Inverse.” Economic Systems Research 12, 401–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Testa, W.A., T.A. Klier, and R.A. Mattoon. 1997. “Reversal of Fortune: Understanding the Midwest Recovery.” Economic Perspectives, [Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago] 21, 2–17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jackson, R.W., Dzikowski, D.A. (2002). A Spatial Output Decomposition Method for Assessing Regional Economic Structure. In: Hewings, G.J.D., Sonis, M., Boyce, D. (eds) Trade, Networks and Hierarchies. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04786-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04786-6_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07712-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-04786-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics