Advertisement

Modeling Structural Linkages in Dynamic and Spatial Interindustry Systems

  • Guy R. West
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

In economics, as in most other disciplines, we use models to illustrate complex relationships among economic variables and other related objects, such as the environment. A model is just a simplified characterization of reality. Like a road map, it highlights the main features of interest but treats as background those characteristics not crucial to the purpose at hand. Through simplification, less is held in view so that more can be understood of what is retained.

Keywords

Computable General Equilibrium Final Demand Computable General Equilibrium Model Model Builder Interregional Migration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Almon, C. 1991. “The INFORUM Approach to Interindustry Modeling.” Economic Systems Research, 3, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anselin, L., S. Rey, and U. Deichmann. 1990. “The Implementation of Integrated Models in a Multi-regional System.” In L. Anselin and M. Madden eds. New Directions in Regional Analysis. London, Belhaven.Google Scholar
  3. Armington, P. 1969. “A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production.” IMF Papers, 16, 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batey, P.W.J., and M. Madden. 1981. “Demographic-Economic Forecasting Within An Activity-commodity Framework: Some Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Results.” Environment and Planning A, 13, 1067–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Batey, P.W.J., M. Madden, and M.J. Weeks. 1987. “Household Income and Expenditure in Extended Input-Output Models: A Comparative Theoretical and Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Regional Science, 27, 341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Batey, P.W. and A.Z. Rose. 1990. “Extended Input-Output Models: Progress and Potential.” International Regional Science Review, 13, 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Batey, P.W. and M.J. Weeks. 1987. “An Extended Input-Output Model Incorporating Employed, Unemployed and In-migrant Households.” Papers of the Regional Science Association, 62, 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beaumont, P.M. 1990. “Supply and Demand Interactions in Integrated Econometric and Input-Output Models.” International Regional Science Review, 13, 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blackwell, J. 1978. “Disaggregation of the Household Sector in Regional Input-Output Analysis: Some Models Specifying Previous Residence of Workers.” Regional Studies, 12, 367–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boadway, R. and J. Treddenick. 1978. “A General Equilibrium Computation of the Effects of the Canadian Tariff Structure.” Canadian Journal of Economics, 11, 424–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bryden, J. 1973. Tourism and Development: A Case Study of the Commonwealth Caribbean. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Buetre, B.L. and F.Z. Ahmadi-Esfanhani. 2000. “Updating an Input-output Table for Use in Policy Analysis.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 44, 573–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caddy, V. 1976. “Empirical Estimation of the Elasticity of Substitution: A Review.” Impact Project Preliminary Working Paper No. OP-09, Industry Commission, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  14. Carrier, H.D. and W.A. Wallace. 1994. “An Epistemological View of Decision Aid Technology with Emphasis on Expert Systems.” In W.A. Wallace, ed. Ethics in Modeling, Oxford, Pergamon.Google Scholar
  15. Carter, A.P. 1970. Structural Change in the American Economy. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Charemza, W.W. and D.F. Deadman. 1997. New Directions in Econometric Practice. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  17. Conway, R.S. Jr. 1979. “The Simulation Properties of a Regional Interindustry Econometric Model.” Papers of the Regional Science Association, 43, 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Conway, R.S. Jr. 1990. “The Washington Projection and Simulation Model: A Regional Interindustry Econometric Model.” International Regional Science Review, 13, 141–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dervis, K., J. de Melo, and S. Robinson. 1982. General Equilibrium Models for Development Policy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Dewhurst, J.H.L. and G.R. West. 1990. “Closing Interregional Input-Output Models with Econometrically Determined Relationships.” In L. Anselin and M. Madden, eds. New Directions in Regional Analysis. London, Belhaven.Google Scholar
  21. Dewhurst, J.H.L. and G.R. West. 1991. “Conjoining Regional and Interregional Input-Output Models with Econometric Models.” In J.J.Ll. Dewhurst, G.J.D. Hewings and R.C. Jensen, eds. Regional Input-Output Modeling: New Developments and Interpretations. Aldershot, Avebury.Google Scholar
  22. Dietzenbacher, E. 1997. “In Vindication of the Ghosh Model: A Reinterpretation of a Price Model.” Journal of Regional Science, 37, 629–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dixon, P.B., B.R. Parmenter, J. Sutton, and D.P. Vincent. 1982. ORANI: A Multisectoral Model of the Australian Economy. Amsterdam, North-Holland.Google Scholar
  24. Dixon, P.B., B.R. Parmenter, A. Powell, and P. Wilcoxen. 1992. Notes and Problems in Applied General Equilibrium Economics. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  25. Dixon, P.B., B.R. Parmenter, and R.J. Rimmer. 1985. “The Sensitivity of ORANI Projections of the Short-Run Effects of Increases in Protection to Variations in the Values Adopted for Export Demand Elasticities.” In K. Jungenfelt and D. Hague eds. Structural Adjustment in Developed Open Economies. London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Duchin, F. 2000. “International Trade: Evolution in the Thought and Analysis of Wassily Leontief.” Paper presented to the XIII International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, Macerata, Italy.Google Scholar
  27. Enders, W. 1995. Applied Econometric Time Series. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Evans, W.D. 1954. “Input-Output Computations.” In T. Barna ed. The Structural Interdependence of the Economy. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Friedman, M. 1953. “The Methodology of Positive Economics.” In M. Friedman. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Fry, J.M., R.L. Fry, and M.R. Peter. 1999. “Inter-Regional Migration in Australia: An Applied Economic Analysis.” Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 5, 111–130.Google Scholar
  31. Gass, S.I. 1983. “Decision-Aiding Models — Validation, Assessment and Related Issues.” Operations Research, 3, 603–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ghosh, A. 1958. “Input-Output Approach in an Allocation System.” Economica, 25, 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Glickman, N.J. 1977. Econometric Analysis of Regional Systems: Explorations in Model Building and Policy Analysis. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hamilton, T.R. and C. Pongtanakorn. 1983. “The Economic Impact of Irrigation Development in Idaho: An Application of Marginal Input-Output Methods.” Annals of Regional Science, 17, 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Israilevich, P.R. 2001. “Frame-shifting in regional general equilibrium models.” Chapter 21 in this volume.Google Scholar
  36. Israilevich, P.R., G.J.D. Hewings, M. Sonis and C.R. Schindler 1997. “Forecasting Structural Change with a Regional Econometric Input-Output Model.” Journal of Regional Science, 37, 565–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jorgensen, D.W. 1984. “Econometric Methods for Applied General Equilibrium Analysis.” In H.E. Scarf and J.B. Shoven, eds. Applied General Equilibrium Analysis. New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Klein, L.R. 1989. “Econometric Aspects of Input-Output Analysis.” In R. Miller, K. Polenske and A. Rose, eds. Frontiers of Input-Output Analysis. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Koopmans, T.C. 1957. Three Essays on the State of Economics Science. New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  40. Lahiri, S. 1976. “Input-Output Analysis with Scale Dependent Coefficients.” Econometrica, 55, 947–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lahr, M.L. 1993. “A Review of the Literature Supporting the Hybrid Approach to Constructing Regional Input-Output Models.” Economic Systems Research, 5, 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leontief, W. 1936. “Quantitative Input-Output Relations in the Economic System of the United States.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 18, 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leontief, W. 1951. The Structure of the American Economy, 1919–1939. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Leontief, W. 1953. Studies in the Structure of the American Economy. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Madden, M. and A.B. Trigg. 1990. “Interregional Migration in an Extended Input-Output Model.” International Regional Science Review, 13, 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McCarthy, M.B. 1991. “LIFT: INFORUM’s Model of the U.S. Economy.” Economic Systems Research, 3, 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McCarl, B.A. 1984. “Model Validation: An Overview with Some Emphasis on Risk Models.” Review of Marketing and Agricultural Models, 52, 153–169.Google Scholar
  48. McGregor, P.G. and J.K. Swales. 1994. “An Investigation into a Neo-Classical Interpretation of Regional Input-Output Analysis.” Strathclyde Papers in Economics 94/1, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.Google Scholar
  49. Meade, D.S. 1999. “Idlift — Recasting the Inforum Model of the US Economy.” Paper to the VII Inforum World Conference, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  50. Mercenier, J. 1995. “Nonuniqueness of Solutions in Applied General Equilibrium Models with Scale Economies and Imperfect Competition.” Economic Theory, 6, 161–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Miernyk, W.H. 1965. The Elements of Input-Output Analysis. New York, Random House.Google Scholar
  52. Miernyk, W.H., E.R. Bonner, J.H. Chapman Jr, and K. Shellhamer. 1967. Impact of the Space Program on a Local Economy: An Input-Output Analysis. Morgantown, West Virginia University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Miller, R.E. and P.D. Blair, P.D. 1985. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  54. Miyazawa, K. 1976. Input-Output Analysis and the Structure of Income Distribution. Berlin, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Moore, F.T. and J.W. Petersen. 1955. “Regional Analysis: An Interindustry Model of Utah.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 37, 368–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Morishima, M. 2000. “Economy and Democracy.” Keynote presentation to the XIII International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, Macerata, Italy.Google Scholar
  57. Oosterhaven, J. and J.H.Ll. Dewhurst. 1990. “A Prototype Demo-Economic Model With an Application to Queensland.” International Regional Science Review, 13, 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Oosterhaven, J. and H. Folmer. 1985. “An Interregional Labor Market Model Incorporating Vacancy Chains and Social Security.” Papers of the Regional Science Association, 58, 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Parmenter, B.R. 1983. “The Impact Macro Package and Export Demand Elasticities.” Australian Economic Papers, 22, 411–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rey, S.J. 1997. “Coefficient Change in Embedded Econometric and Input-Output Models at the Regional Level.” Economic Systems Research, 9, 307–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rey, S.J. 1998. “The Performance of Alternative Integration Strategies for Combining Regional Econometric and Input-Output Models.” International Regional Science Review, 21, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Richardson, H.W. 1972. Input-Output and Regional Economics. London, Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
  63. Roy, J.R. 1997. “A Price-Responsive Framework for Interregional Input-Output.” Annals of Regional Science, 31, 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shaffer, R. 1989. Community Economics: Economic Structure and Change in Smaller Communities. Ames, Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Shoven, J.B. and J. Whalley. 1992. Applying General Equilibrium. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Skene, J. 1993. “The Economic Impact of Growth in Visitor Expenditure: A Quantitative Assessment.” Working Paper No. 92, Bureau of Industry Economics. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  67. Stern, R.M., J. Francis, and B. Schumacher. 1976. Price Elasticities in International Trade: An Annotated Bibliography. London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
  68. Tiebout, C.M. 1969. “An Empirical Region Input-Output Projection Model: the State of Washington, 1980.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 51, 334–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tilanus, C.B. 1967. “Marginal vs Average Input-Output Coefficients in Input-Output Forecasting.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. 81, 140–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. van Dijk, J. and J. Oosterhaven. 1986. “Regional Impacts of Migrants’ Expenditures: An Input-output Vacancy Chain Approach.” In P.W. Batey and M. Madden eds. Integrated Analysis of Regional Systems. London, Pion.Google Scholar
  71. Walras, L. 1877. Elements of Pure Economics. Translated by W. Jaffe 1954. Homewood, IL., Irwin.Google Scholar
  72. West, G. 1994. “The Queensland Impact and Projection Model: The Household Sector.” Economic Systems Research, 6, 363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. West, G.R. and A. Gamage. 1997. “Differential Multipliers for Tourism in Victoria. Tourism Economics, 3, 57–68.Google Scholar
  74. West, G.R. and R.W. Jackson. 1998. “Input-Output+Econometric and Econometric+Input-Output: Model Differences or Different Models?” Regional Analysis and Policy, 28, 33–48.Google Scholar
  75. West, G.R. and J.R. Roy. 1998. “Towards an Interregional Framework for Joint Assessment of Tourism and the Environment.” Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 4, 161–176.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guy R. West
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Economic Policy ModelingUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations