IT Sourcing — A Dynamic Phenomenon: Forming an Institutional Theory Perspective

  • Bandula Jayatilaka


Research as well as industry surveys have shown that IS outsourcing is not a static phenomenon and success of it is not a definitive outcome. Lack of success in IS outsourcing has led companies to seek costly alterations in their IS outsourcing arrangements (Input 1999c). In general, companies shift IS sourcing due to lack of success or due to newly emerging conditions and needs. Therefore, improved understanding of the factors influencing such shifts in companies’ outsourcing arrangements may become useful in making better decisions and in developing the IS outsourcing research stream. Specifically, the following research questions can be raised at this stage. What are the concepts relevant for explaining the changes in sourcing and theoretical foundations that can explain the processes and antecedents to change? Review of past IS outsourcing research shows that there is a dearth of research on the continuation of IS outsourcing arrangements. Nam, Rajagopalan, Rao, and Chaudhury, (1996) investigated the determinants that would lead to continuation of IS outsourcing, which they referred to as a secondlevel decision to outsource and treated the continuation as an isolated static phenomenon and did not view it as a change process.


Organizational Change Institutional Factor Dynamic Phenomenon Institutional Perspective Multiple Client 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aldrich, H. E. (1979), Organizations and Environments ,Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Ang, S. and Cummings, L. (1997) “Strategic Response to Institutional Influences on Information Systems Outsourcing.” Organization Science, 8(3), 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anthes, Gary H. (1997) “Outsourcing pros and cons” Computerworld 31(14): 75 1997 Apr 7.Google Scholar
  4. Applegate, Lynda M and Montealegre, Ramiro (1991) “Eastman Kodak Co.: Managing Information Systems Through Strategic Alliances” -.1991, Harvard Business School case. Harvard Business School Publishing Division, Cambridge MA,Google Scholar
  5. Apte, U.M. and Mason, R. (1995) “Global Disaggregation of Information-intensive Services” Management Science, 41(7), 1250–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Apte, U. M., Sobol, M. G., Hanaoka, S., Shimada, T., Saarinen, T., Salmela, T., and Vepsalainen, A. P. J. (1997) “IS outsourcing practices in the USA, Japan, and Finland: a comparative study.” Journal of Information Technology, 12, 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourgeois, L. J. (1984) “Strategic Management and Determinism”, Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9(4), 586–596.Google Scholar
  8. Chandler, A. (1962) Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chaudhury, A., Nam, K., and Rao, H.R. (1995) “Management of Information Systems Outsourcing: A Bidding Perspective.” Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(2), 131–159.Google Scholar
  10. Child, John 1972 ‘Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice’. Sociology 6: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Child, John, and Kieser, Alfred (1981) “Development of organizations over time” In P.O Nystrom and W. H. Starbuck, (eds.) Handbook of Organizational Design, 28–64.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, T. D., Zmud, R. W., and McCray, G. E. (1995) “The outsourcing of information systems: transforming the nature of business in the information industry.” Journal of Information Technology, 10, 221–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, Charles E. Cavanaugh, Nancy C. Brown, Carol V. Sambamurthy, V Building change-readiness capabilities in the IS organization: Insights from the Bell Atlantic experience. MIS Quarterly. 21(4): 425–455. 1997 Dec.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cole-Gomolski, Barb (1999a) Web technologies alter outsourcing deals. Computerworld. 33(28). 24. 1999 June 14.Google Scholar
  15. Cole-Gomolski, Barb (1999b) Businesses lean toward shorter IS contracts. Computerworld_ 33(28). 24. 1999 July 12.Google Scholar
  16. Cross, J. (1995) “IS Outsourcing: British Petroleum’s Competitive Approach.” Harvard Business Review, May-June, 1995 (94–102).Google Scholar
  17. Currie, W. L. (1996) “Outsourcing in the private and public sectors: an unpredictable IS strategy.” European Journal of Information Systems, 4, 226–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Denzing and Lincoln (1998) “Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials”, Thousand Oaks: CA, Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  19. DeSanctis, Gerardine and Poole, Marshal Scott (1994) “Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory.” Organization Science. 5(2). May 94.Google Scholar
  20. DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’. American Sociological Review 48: 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell (1991) ‘Introduction’ in The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Walter W. Powell and Paul J. DiMaggio (eds.), 1–38. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. DiRomualdo, A. and Gurbaxani, V. (1998) “Strategic Intent for IS Outsourcing.” Sloan Management Review, 39(4), Summer 1998, 67–80.Google Scholar
  23. Fine, Michelle, Weis, Lois, Weseen, Susan and Wong, Loonmun (2000) “For Whom? Qualitative Research, Representations, and Social Responsibilities” In Handbook of Qualitative Research (eds.) Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, Thousand Oaks: CA, Sage Publications, 107–132.Google Scholar
  24. Fitzgerald, G. and Willcocks, L. (1994) “Contracts and Partnerships in the Outsourcing of IS” Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Information Systems, 9198.Google Scholar
  25. Gallivan, M.J., and Oh, W. (1999) “Analyzing IS Outsourcing Relationships as Alliances among Multiple Clients and Vendors.” Proceedings of the 32 Pnd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Google Scholar
  26. Greenwood, Royston, and C. R. Hinnings (1996) “Understanding radical organizational change: bringing together the old and new institutionalism,” Academy of Management Review, 21: 1022–1054Google Scholar
  27. Grover, V., Cheon, M. J., and Teng, J. T. C. (1994) “An evaluation of the impact of corporate strategy and the role of information technology on IS functional outsourcing.” European Journal of Information Systems, 3(3), 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoffman, Thomas.(1993) “ ‘In’ sourcing saves utility $600,000” Computerworld 27(20): 65, 68. 1993 May 17.Google Scholar
  29. Hu, Q., Saunders, C, and Gebelt, M. (1997) “Diffusion of Information Systems Outsourcing: A Reevaluation of Influence Sources.” Information Systems Research, 8(3), Sep. 1997, 288–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Input (1999a). Small Vendors Win Growing Share of IS Outsourcing Contracts www. input. com/article26. cfm?research_id=340.Google Scholar
  31. Input (1999b). Outsourcing Clients are Growing Restless: 20% May Switch Vendors at Contract Renewal. Scholar
  32. Input (1999c). IS Outsourcing Soars in 4Q 98, Plummets in 1Q 99 1 . cfm /public/article3 1.cfm.
  33. Ives, Blake, Hamilton, S. and Davis, G. (1980) “A Framework for Research in ComputerBased Management Information Systems”, Management Science, 26, 9, 910–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gersick, C. J. G. “Pacing Strategic Change: The Case of a New Venture,” Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1994, 9–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lacity, M. and Willcocks, L. (1998) “An Empirical Investigation of Information Technology Sourcing Practices: Lessons From Experience.” MIS Quarterly, 22(3), Sept. 1998, 363–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lacity, M., Wilicocks, L., and Feeny, D. (1996) “The Value of Selective IS Sourcing.” Sloan Management Review, Spring 1996, 13–25.Google Scholar
  37. Lacity, M., Willcocks, L., and Feeny, D. (1995) “IS Outsourcing: Maximize Flexibility and Control.” Harvard Business Review, May-June 1995, 85–93.Google Scholar
  38. Lais, S. (1999). Outtasking: A custom fit. Computerworld. 33(24). 43. 1999, June 14.Google Scholar
  39. Lattig, M. (1999) New outsourcing market: Rent-a-gigabyte. InfoWorld. 1999, July 5Google Scholar
  40. Loh, L. and Venkatraman, N. (1992) “Diffusion of Information Technology Outsourcing: Influence Sources and the Kodak Effect.” Information Systems Research, 3(4), Dec. 1992, 334–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marcolin, B. and McLellan, K. (1998) “Effective IS Outsourcing Arrangements.” Proceedings of the 31 st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 654–665.Google Scholar
  42. Markus, Lynn and Robey, Daniel (1988) “Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research”. Management Science. 35(5). 583–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mason, Richard O. McKenney, James L. Copeland, Duncan G “An historical method for MIS research: Steps and assumptions”. MIS Quarterly. 21(3): 307–320. 1997 Sep.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mason, Richard O. Mitroff, Ian I. “A Program for Research on Managment Information Systems”. Management Science. 19(5): 475–487. 1973 Jan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McFarlan, F. and Nolan, R. (1995) “How to Manage an IS Outsourcing Alliance.” Sloan Management Review, Winter 1995, 9–23.Google Scholar
  46. Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowan (1977) ‘Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony’. American Journal of Sociology 83: 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miller, Danny and Friesen P.H. (1984) Organizations a Quantum View. Engelwood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar
  48. Nam, K., Rajagopalan, S., Rao, H.R. and Chaudhury, A. “A Two-Level Investigation of Information Systems Outsourcing,” Communications of the ACM (39:7), 1996, pp. 3644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Orlikowski, Wanda J. (1996) “Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective”. Information Systems Research. 7(1). March.Google Scholar
  50. Orlikowski, Wanda J. and Gash, Debra C. (1994) “Technological Frames: Making Sense of Information Technology in Organizations”. ACM Transactions on Information Systems-12(2). April 94.Google Scholar
  51. Orlikowski, Wanda J. (1992) “The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations.” Organization Science. 3(2). August 92.Google Scholar
  52. Pettigrew, Andrew, M. “Contextualist research and the study of organizational change processes”. In E Mumford, R. Hirschheim, G. Fitzgerald, T. Woodharper (eds.) Research Methods in Information Systems, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam Netherlands. 1984.Google Scholar
  53. Quinn, J. and Hilmer, F. (1994) “Strategic Outsourcing.” Sloan Management Review, Summer 1994, 43–55.Google Scholar
  54. Rajagopalan, Nandini and Spreitzer, Gretchen M., “Toward a Theory of Strategic Change: A Multi-lens Perspective and Integrative Framework,” Academy of Management Review, 22, 1996 48–79.Google Scholar
  55. Ryan, Gery W. and Bernard, Russell (2000) “Data Management and Analysis Methods”, In Handbook of Qualitative Research (eds.) Norman K. Denzin and Yvoinna S. Lincoln, Thousand Oaks: CA, Sage Publications, 769–802.Google Scholar
  56. Saunders, C., Gebelt, M., and Hu, Q. (1997) “Achieving success in Information Systems outsourcing.” California Management Review, 39(2), winter 1997, 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sharma, R. and Yetton, P. “Interorganizational Cooperation to Develop Information Systems,” Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Information Systems, Cleveland, OH, 1996, 122–132.Google Scholar
  58. Sobol, M. and Apte, U. (1995) “Domestic and global outsourcing practices of America’s most effective IS users.” Journal of Information Technology, 1995, 10, 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sridhar, S. and Balachandran, B. (1997) “Incomplete Information, Task Assignment, and Managerial Control Systems.” Management Science, 43(6), June 1997, 764–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Swanson E.B. and Ramiler, N C. “The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation” Organization Science 7(1), 1997.Google Scholar
  61. Van Mieghem, J. (1999) “Coordinating Investment, Procurement, Production, and Subcontracting.” Management Science, 45(7), 954–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Walsham, G. (1995) Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 1995, 4, 74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Whang, S. (1992) “Contracting for Software Development.” Management Science, 38(3), 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Williamson, O. (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  65. Zucker, Lynne G. (1988). “Where do institutional patterns come from? Organizations as actors” In Social systems’ in Institutional patterns and organizations: culture and environment. Lynne G. Zucker (ed.), 23–49. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bandula Jayatilaka
    • 1
  1. 1.School of ManagementBinghamton University SUNYBinghamtonUSA

Personalised recommendations