Skip to main content

A Macroscopic Air Transportation Capacity Model: Metrics and Delay Correlation

  • Conference paper
New Concepts and Methods in Air Traffic Management

Part of the book series: Transportation Analysis ((TRANSANALY))

Summary

The need for a macroscopic air transportation modeling approach is discussed and a recently developed model is applied to the U.S. air transportation system. The new model is designed to estimate the maximum capacity of a national air transportation region. The model is based on empirically observed aircraft arrival rates, government published annual operational rate statistics, and analytically derived airport arrival/departure functions. The underlying premise is that the air transportation system can be modeled as a multi path, steady state network of queues, whose maximum capacity is the sum of the maximum airport operational rates, less airspace human factors limitations. Capacity is defined to be twice the hourly arrival rate (since departures equal arrivals in equilibrium). The validity of the model predictions is tested by: 1) observing reported airport delay values ranked in order of model estimated maximum capacity utilization; and 2) observing historical operational growth rates for airports that are now operating near predicted maximum capacity. A national capacity value is estimated and compared to observed historical and predicted growth rates. All planned runway additions are included in the national capacity estimate and a growing national capacity shortfall is predicted. It is estimated that the US is currently operating at 57% of maximum capacity and will be at 70% national capacity by 2010. It is observed that significant delays begin at about 50% capacity fraction and grow at a hyperbolic rate. The effect of adopting new technology and operational concepts is shown to have a better impact on capacity growth (i.e. up to 30%) than runway construction (i.e. 1% per runway). This work should be of interest to policy makers who are responsible for making investments in national and/or local air transportation systems and for those responsible for measuring the air transportation systems operational capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Davis,T.J., H. Ertzberger, S.M Green,., and W. Nedell, “Design and Evaluation of an Air Traffic Control Final Approach Spacing Tool”, AIAA journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 848–854, July-August 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Denery, D. and H. Ertzberger, “The Center-Tracon Automation System: Simulation and Field Testing”, Modelling and Simulation in Air Traffic Management„ L. Bianco, P. Dell’Olmo and A. Odoni, Editors, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Donohue, G., “A Simplified Air Transportation System Capacity Model”, Journal of Air Traffic Control, April-June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. FAA, “Airport Capacity and Delay”, Advisory Circular 150/5060–5, 23 September 1983, amended I December 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. FAA, “Aviation Capacity Enhancement Plan”, December 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. FAA, “Terminal Area Forecasts Summery”, FY 1998–2015, October 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gilbo, E.P. “Optimizing Airport Capacity Utilization in Air Traffic Flow Management Subject to Constraints at Arrival and Departure Fixes”, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 5, No. 5, September 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hanson, M., H.S.J. Tsao, S.C.A. Huang, W. Wei, “Empirical Analysis of Airport Capacity Enhancement Impact: Case Study of DFW Airport”, Transportation Research Board 78th Annual Meeting, January 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Idris, H., B. Delcaire, I. Anagnostakis, W. Hall, R.J. Hansman, E. Feron, A.R.Odoni “Observations of Departure Processes at Logan Airport to support the Development of Departure Planning Tools”, 2nd USA/EUROPE Air Traffic Management R and D Seminar, Orlando, 1 - 4 December 1998, http://atm-seminar-98.eurocontrol.fr/.

  10. Jackson, M., Y.J. Zhao and R.A. Slattery, “Sensitivity of Trajectory Prediction in Air Traffic Management”, AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol.22, No. 2, March-April 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kostiuk, P., E. Gaier, and D. Long, “The economic Impacts of Air Traffic Congestion”, forthcoming in the Air Traffic Control Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Long, D., D. Lee, J. Johnson, E. Gaier and P. Kostiuk, “Modeling Air Traffic Management Technologies with a Queuing Network Model of the National Airspace System”, Logistics Management Institute, McLean Virginia NASA/CR-1999–208988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mineta, N., “Avoiding Aviation Gridlock and Reducing the Accident Rate: A Consensus for Change”, National Civil Aviation Review Commission, December 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Odoni, A. R., J. Bowman, D. Delahaye, J. Deyst, E. Feron, R. J. Hansman, K. Khan, J. K. Kuchar, N. Pujet, R. W. Simpson, “Existing and Required Modeling Capabilities for Evaluating ATM Systems and Concepts”, International Center for Air Transportation Massachusetts Institute of Technology, March 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sheffi,Y., “URBAN TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS: Equilibrium Analysis with Mathematical Programming Methods”, Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Donohue, G.L. (2001). A Macroscopic Air Transportation Capacity Model: Metrics and Delay Correlation. In: Bianco, L., Dell’Olmo, P., Odoni, A.R. (eds) New Concepts and Methods in Air Traffic Management. Transportation Analysis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04632-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04632-6_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07491-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-04632-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics