Advertisement

GIS and Large-scale Linear Programming: Evolution of a Spatial Decision Support System for Land Use Management

  • Richard L. Church
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

Forest management and planning is a major task faced by private timber companies and public agencies. As an example, the U.S. Forest Service is responsible for managing over 190 million acres of forests and grasslands in the U.S., an area that is almost twice the size of Germany. Thus, it is not surprising that the U.S. Forest Service uses many types of analysis tools including the use of input-output models to assess the impact of forest operations on local and regional economies. The most common approach to plan activities for a forested region over decades involves decomposing the decision making process into three hierarchically-defined components: strategic, tactical, and operational (Weintraub and Cholaky, 1991; Nelson, Broadie, and Sessions, 1991). Each level of management involves the development of decision support models, either optimization or simulation. These models aid in exploring alternatives and generating tradeoffs among objectives. Strategic models help identify overall targets for harvesting and conservation activities over a long planning horizon and over large tracts of land. Tactical models help specify where the activities should be accomplished in order to meet strategic targets. Finally, operational models help translate tactical level decisions into detailed operations plans. This type of hierarchical decomposition has been used in forest planning by governmental agencies and by private industry (Church, Murray and Barber, 1994).

Keywords

Analysis Area Planning Unit Forest Planning Timing Choice Tactical Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barber K. (1986) Large FORPLAN models: an exercise in folly, In Lessons from using FORPLAN, USDA Forest Service, Land Management Planning, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  2. Bare B.B. and Field R. (1987) An evaluation of FORPLAN from an operations research perspective, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-140, Fort Collins, CO.Google Scholar
  3. Carroll B., Landrum V. and Pious L. (1995) Timber harvest scheduling with adjacency constraints: using ARC/INFO to make Forplan realistic in 1995 ESRI User Conference Proceedings, Redlands, California, USA (http://www.esri.com/base/common/userconf/ proc95/prochome.html).Google Scholar
  4. Church R. and Barber K. (1992). Dissaggregating forest management plans to treatment areas, Stand Inventory Technologies 92, 287–295, Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar
  5. Church R., Lanter D. and Loban S. (1992) VIP: a spatial decision support system for the US Forest Service, Working paper, Department of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.Google Scholar
  6. Church R., Murray A. and Barber K. (1994) Designing a hierarchical planning model for USDA Forest Service planning, in Proceedings of the 1994 Symposium on Systems Analysis and Forest Resources, 401–409.Google Scholar
  7. Church R., Murray A., and Barber K. (1999) Forest Planning at the Tactical Level Working paper (available from the first author).Google Scholar
  8. Johnson K.N. and Stuart T. (1987) FORPLAN Version 2: Mathematical Programmer’s Guide, Land Management Planning Systems Section, US Forest Service, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  9. Kent B., Bare B.B., Field R. and Bradley G. (1991) Natural resource land management planning using large-scale linear programs: the USDA Forest Service experience with FORPLAN. Operations Research 39, 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nelson J., Brodie J.D. and Sessions J. (1991) Integrating short-term, area-based logging plans with long-term harvest schedules, Forest Science 37, 101–122.Google Scholar
  11. Weintraub A. and Cholaky A. (1991) A hierarchical approach to forest planning, Forest Science 37, 439–460.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard L. Church

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations