Advertisement

Optimal Distribution Strategies

  • Mark Birkin
  • Richard Culf
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

This chapter examines the relationship between methods developed in the regional science community, and the application of those methods within practical business planning contexts. It is based on the experience of the authors over the last decade within a commercial organisation, GMAP Limited, which has grown out of the School of Geography at the University of Leeds. The linkages between GMAP and the University of Leeds continue to be strong ones. GMAP’s historical ‘core competence’ has been in the field of spatial interaction modelling, and this in itself builds directly on a strong research tradition within the School of Geography at Leeds (e.g., Wilson, 1970, 1974; Harris and Wilson, 1978; Clarke and Wilson, 1983). Without doubt the greatest achievement of our business has been to find practical, robust and effective ways to implement these largely theoretical urban planning models within large commercial organisations, including banks, supermarkets, motor vehicles distributors, telecommunications and oil companies. GMAP has generated a turnover in excess of £20,000,000 over the last ten years through location modelling (see also Clarke and Clarke, chapter 8).

Keywords

Spatial Interaction Model Dealer Location Spatial Optimisation Target Workload Quick Service Restaurant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Birkin M., Clarke G., Clarke M. and Wilson A.G. (1996) Intelligent GIS: Location decisions and strategic planning, Geoinformation, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. Birkin M., Clarke M. and George F. (1995) The use of parallel computers to solve non-linear spatial optimisation problems: an application to network planning, Environment and Planning A, 27, 1049–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clarke M. and Wilson A.G. (1983) Dynamics of urban spatial structure: progress and problems, Journal of Regional Science, 23, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. George F., Radcliffe N., Smith M., Birkin M. and Clarke M. (1997) Algorithms for solving a spatial optimisation problem on a parallel computer, Concurrency: Practice and Experience, 9(8), 753–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ghosh A. and Harche F. (1993) Location-allocation models in the private sector: progress, problems and prospects, Location Science 1, 81–106.Google Scholar
  6. The Guardian (1998) Safeway links with BP to pump up sales, July 16.Google Scholar
  7. Harris B. and Wilson A.G. (1978) Equilibrium values and dynamics of attractiveness terms in the production-constrained spatial interaction model, Environment and Planning A, 10, 371–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Teitz M. and Bart P. (1968) Heuristic methods for estimating the generalised vertex median of a weighted graph, Operational Research, 16, 901–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Wilson A.G. (1970) Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling, Pion, London.Google Scholar
  10. Wilson A.G. (1974) Urban and regional models in geography and planning, John Wiley, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Birkin
  • Richard Culf

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations