Advertisement

Transport and Urban Development

  • Gunter Haag
  • Kathrin Gruetzmann
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

Transport systems can only be seen in their regional context. Therefore the interactions between the transport system consisting of different transport modes and the regional structure (especially the settlement pattern) have to be investigated. On the one hand for example, changes in the population distribution influences the volume and the distribution of traffic flows. On the other hand the volume of transport within a region and the mix between public and private provision has an impact on the migration behaviour of households and firms.

Keywords

Public Transport Traffic Flow Population Distribution Population Number Planning Scenario 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aoyama Y. (1989), A historical review of transport and land-use models in Japan, Transportation Research 23 A, 53–61Google Scholar
  2. Batty M. (1994), A chronicle of scientific planning: the Anglo-American modelling experience, Journal of the American Planning Association 60, 7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berechman J. and Small K.A. (1988) Research policy and review 25: modelling land use and transportation: an interpretative review for growth areas, Environment and Planning A, 20, 1283–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyce D.E. (1988) Renaissance of large-scale models, Papers of the Regional Science Association 65, 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Der Bundesminister für Verkehr (Hrsg.) (1996): Qualifizierung, Quantifizierung und Evaluierung wegebauinduzierter Wegebauprozesse, Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Verkehr, FE-Nr. 90436/95, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  6. Eurosil, WP7 (1998): Modelling Multimodality, Intermodality, Interoperability, Accessibility and Area Impacts of Transport Infrastructure: State of the Art, Steinbeis Transferzentrum Angewandte Systemanalyse Stuttgart (STASA), Institute of Transport Science University of Cologne, Insitute of Spatial Planning (IRPUD), EU, to be publishedGoogle Scholar
  7. Eurosil, WP6 (1998): SILUS Case Study, Steierwald Schönharting und Partner GmbH (SSP), Steinbeis Transferzentrum Angewandte Systemanalyse Stuttgart (STASA), EU, to be publishedGoogle Scholar
  8. Göbel G. (1997) Untersuchungen über die Wechselwirkungen zwischen Siedlungsstruktur und Verkehrssystem am Beispiel des Ausbaus der A81 im Korridor Stuttgart — Herrenberg, Diplomarbeit, TrierGoogle Scholar
  9. Haag G. (1989) Dynamic Decision Theory. Application to Urban and Regional Topics, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harris B. (1985) Urban simulation models in regional science, Journal of Regional Science 25, 545–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harris B. (1994), Science in planning: past, present, future, Journal of the American Planning Association 60, 31–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hutchinson B., Nijkamp P. and Batty M. (eds.) (1985) Optimization and Discrete Choice in Urban Systems, Springer Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Hutchinson B. and Batty M. (eds.) (1986) Advances in Urban Systems Modeling, North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam/OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Kain J.F. (1987) Computer simulation models of urban location, in Mills, E.S. (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. II, Elsevier Publishers, Amsterdam, 847–75Google Scholar
  15. Ministerium für Umwelt und Verkehr Baden-Württemberg (Hrsg.) (1996) Telematik im Verkehr, Regionales Verkehrsmanagement Stuttgart, Das STORM-Projekt, Verkehrswissenschaftliche Bewertung, Schriftenreihe der Straßenbauverwaltung, Heft 7, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  16. SACTRA (1994) The Standing Advisory Committee on Trunk Road Assessment: Trunk Roads and the Generation of Traffic, Department of Traffic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Studiengesellschaft Nahverkehr mbH (SNV) (1990): Vereinfachte Nachfrageermittlung und Kosten-Nutzen-Abschätzung für Park-and-Ride-Anlagen, Teil 1: Nachfrageermittlung, in: Verkehr und Technik, Heft 3Google Scholar
  18. Webster F.V., Bly P.H. and Paulley N.J. (eds.) (1988) Urban Land-Use and Transport Interaction. Policies and Models, Report of the International Study Group on Land- Use/ Transport Interaction (ISGLUTI), Avebury, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  19. Wegener M. (1986) Integrated forecasting models of urban and regional systems, in Integrated Analysis of Regional Systems, London Papers in Regional Science 15, 9–24Google Scholar
  20. Wegener M. (1987) Transport and location in integrated spatial models, in Nijkamp, P. and Reichman S. (eds.), Transportation Planning in a Changing World, Gower, Aldershot, 208–25Google Scholar
  21. Wegener M. (1994) Operational urban models: state of the art, Journal of the American Planning Association 60, 17–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wegener M. (1998) Applied models of urban land use, transport and environment: state of the art and future developments’ , in Batten D., Kim T.J., Lundqvist L. and Mattsson L.-G. (eds.) Network Infrastructure and the Urban Environment: Recent Advances in Land- Use/ Transportation Modelling, Springer Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  23. Weidlich W. and Haag G. (1983) Concepts and Models of a Quantitative Sociology, Berlin, Heidelberg, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Weidlich W. and Haag G. (1988) Interregional Migration, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilson A.G. (1997) Land use/transport interaction models — past and future, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 32,1Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gunter Haag
  • Kathrin Gruetzmann

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations