Introduction

  • Graham Clarke
  • Moss Madden
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

In the mid 1990s there were a number of papers in regional science that questioned the relevance and purpose of the entire sub-discipline. Bailly and Coffey (1994) for example, talked of ‘regional science in crisis’ . They argued that there were two fundamental problems. First, regional science was too theoretical in the sense that many of its products were models that could neither be calibrated (too complex) or operationalised (too abstract) in the real world. They suggested that regional science had not sufficiently demonstrated that it can address real-world problems and subsequently lacked a focus on relevant policy issues. Second, they argued that regional science had become too narrow in focus and had moved away too far from real people and their daily concerns or struggles in life. This was not the first time we had witnessed these sorts of arguments, both from outside the discipline and from within. Sayer (1976) was perhaps the first to argue for a shift from a model-based focus in regional science to one based on political economy. Breheny (1984) criticised the ‘deep ignorance among regional scientists of the nature of practical policy making and implementation’ (see also Rodwin (1987) for similar views in the mid 1980s). Such self-reflection is a feature of many disciplines as they reach maturity. There have been many similar reflections in geography (Johnston 1996, Barnes 1996) and economics (see the collection in the January edition of the Economic Journal 1991).

Keywords

Migration Europe Transportation Marketing Metaphor 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bailly A.S. and Coffey W.J. (1994) Regional science in crisis: a plea for a more open and relevant approach, Papers in Regional Science, 73, 3–14Google Scholar
  2. Barnes T. (1996) Logics of dislocation: models, metaphors and meanings of economic space, Guildford Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Bertuglia C.S, Clarke G.P. and Wilson A.G. (1994) Modelling the city, Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Birkin M., Clarke G.P., Clarke M. and Wilson A.G. (1996) Intelligent GIS, Geoinformation, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Boyce D. (1988) Renaissance of large-scale models, Papers of the Regional Science Association, 65, 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Breheny M.J. (1984) The relevance of regional science to regional policy, Paper presented to the annual meeting of the Australian and New Zealand section of the Regional Science Association, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  7. Clarke M. and Wilson A.G. (1987) Towards an applicable human geography, Environment and Planning A, 19, 1525–1541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cole S. (1997) Closure in Cole’s reformulated Leontief model, Papers in Regional Science, 76(1), 29–42Google Scholar
  9. Isard W., Azis I.J., Drennan M.P., Miller R.E., Saltzman S. and Thorbecke E. (1998) Methods of interregional and regional analysis, Ashgate, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Isserman A. (1995) The history, status and future of regional science: an american perspective, International Regional Science Review, 17(3), 249–296Google Scholar
  11. Johnston R.J. (1996) Geography and geographers, 5th edition, Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  12. Lee D.B. (1973) Requiem for large-scale models, Journal of theAmerican Institute of Planners, 3, 163–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pacione M. (ed, 1999) Applied geography: principles and practice, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  14. Plane D.A. (1994) Comment: on discipline and disciplines in regional science, Papers in Regional Science, 73, 19–23Google Scholar
  15. Rees J. (1999) Regional science: from crisis to opportunity, Papers in Regional Science, 78, 101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rodwin L. (1987) On the education of urban and regional specialists: a comparative perspective, Papers of the Regional Science Association, 62, 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rosenau P.M. (1992) Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences: insights, inroads and intrusions Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  18. Sayer R.A. (1976) A critique of urban modelling: from regional science to urban and regional political economy, Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  19. Sheppard E. (1995) Dissenting from spatial analysis, Urban Geography; 16, 283–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Van Geenhuizen M. and Nijkamp P. (1996) Progress in regional science: a European perspective, International Regional Science Review, 19(3), 223–246Google Scholar
  21. Vickerman R. (1994) Comment: regional science in crisis? A European view, Papers in Regional Science, 73, 33–36Google Scholar
  22. West G. and Jensen R. (1995) Validation issues in regional modelling, Paper presented to the 42nd North American Regional Science Meeting, Cincinnati, November.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graham Clarke
  • Moss Madden

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations