Objectives of an Imperfectly Competitive Firm: A Surplus Approach
We consider a firm acting strategically on behalf of its shareholders. The price normalization problem arising in general equilibrium models of imperfect competition can be overcome by using the concept of real wealth maximization. This concept is based on shareholders’ aggregate demand and does not involve any utility comparisons. We explore the efficiency properties of real wealth maxima for the group of shareholders. A strategy is called S-efficient (S stands for shareholders) if there is no other strategy such that shareholders’ new total demand can be redistributed in a way that all shareholders will be better off. Our main result states that the set of real wealth maximizing strategies coincides with the set of S-efficient strategies provided that shareholders’ social surplus is concave. Thus, even if a firm does not know the preferences of its shareholders it can achieve S-efficiency by selecting a real wealth maximizing strategy.
KeywordsAggregate Demand Profit Function Incomplete Market Surplus Function Social Surplus
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Arrow, K.: Collected Papers of Kenneth Arrow. Social Choice and Justice. Cambridge: The Bellknap Press of Harvard University Press (1983)Google Scholar
- 5.Dierker, H., B. Grodal: Non-Existence of Cournot-Walras Equilibrium in a General Equilibrium Model with Two Oligopolists, in W. Hildenbrand and A. Mas-Colell eds., Contributions to Mathematical Economics, North Holland, 167185 (1986)Google Scholar
- 6.Drèze, J.H., Investment under Private Ownership: Optimality, Equilibrium and Stability, in Allocation Under Uncertainty; Equilibrium and Optimality, J.H. Drèze ed., New York: Wiley, 129–165 (1974)Google Scholar
- 10.Luenberger, D.: Microeconomic Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill (1995)Google Scholar
- 11.Magill, M., M. Quinzii: Theory of Incomplete Markets, Cambridge, London: MIT Press (1996)Google Scholar