Skip to main content

Information and Efficiency in Coordination Games: Recent Experimental Results

  • Chapter

Abstract

Previous experimental results of repeated coordination games show that subjects often end up in “poor” equilibria. Strategic uncertainty about the opponents’ moves induces players to select poor, but secure, equilibria. In our paper, we investigate how public information on previous moves of opponents may be used to reduce strategic uncertainty and, therefore, favor coordination on superior equilibria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Van Huyck, J., R.C. Battalio, and R.O. Beil (1990) Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty and coordination failure. American Economic Review 80, 234 - 248

    Google Scholar 

  2. Van Huyck, J., R.C. Battalio, and R.O. Beil (1991) Strategic uncertainty, equilibrium selection, and coordination failure in average opinion games. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 895 - 910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper, R.W., D.V. De Jong, R. Forsythe, and T.W. Ross (1990) Selection criteria in coordination games. American Economic Review 80, 218–233

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper, R.W., D.V. De Jong, R. Forsythe, and T.W. Ross (1992) Forward induction in coordination games. Economics Letters 40, 167–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper, R.W., D.V. De Jong, R. Forsythe, and T.W. Ross (1992) Communication in coordination games. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 739–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bryant, J., (1983) A simple rational expectations Keynes-type model. Quarterly Journal of Economics 97, 525–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harsanyi, J.C. and R. Selten (1988) A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berninghaus, S.K. and K.-M. Ehrhart (2000) Coordination and information: Recent experimental results. Institute of Statistics and Mathematical Economics, University of Karlsruhe, mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  9. Berninghaus, S.K. and K.-M. Ehrhart (1998) Time horizon and equilibrium selection in tacit coordination games: Experimental results. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 37, 231–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Selten, R. and R. Stoecker (1986) End behavior in sequences of finite prisoner’s dilemma supergames: A learning theory approach. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 7, 47–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cooper, R.W., D.V. De Jong, R. Forsythe, and T.W. Ross (1993) Forward induction in the Battle-of-the-Sexes Games. American Economic Review 83, 1303–1316

    Google Scholar 

  12. Van Huyck, J., A.B. Gillette, and R.C. Battalio (1992) Credible assignments in coordination games. Games and Economic Behavior 4, 606–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Huyck, J., R.C. Battalio, and R.O. Beil (1993) Asset markets as an equilibrium selection mechanism: Coordination failure, game form auctions, and tacit communication. Games and Economic Behavior 5, 485–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Battalio, R., L. Samuelson, and J. van Huyck (1999) Optimization incentives and coordination failure in laboratory stag hunt games. mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  15. Keynes, J.M. (1936) The general theory of interest, employment, and money. McMillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cachon, G. and C. Camerer (1996) Loss avoidance and forward induction in experimental coordination games. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111, 165–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman (1991) Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 1039–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berninghaus, S.K., Ehrhart, KM. (2001). Information and Efficiency in Coordination Games: Recent Experimental Results. In: Debreu, G., Neuefeind, W., Trockel, W. (eds) Economics Essays. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04623-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04623-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07539-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-04623-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics