Skip to main content

Inferior Goods, Giffen Goods, and Shochu

  • Chapter
Economics Essays

Abstract

According to a well-known result by W. Hildenbrand [6], if all consumers possess the same demand function and the density of the expenditure distribution is decreasing, than the average income effect term is non-negative even if inferior goods are present, so that the aggregate demand must be monotone. We show that if the expenditure density is uni-modal and a certain relation between the income density and individual demand is satisfied, than the average income effect term is negative and Giffen goods are not ruled out. We show that the lowest-grade rice-based Japanese spirit (shochu) satisfies this condition. The data suggest that this commodity might be a Giffen good.

This research was partly supported by a MINERVA foundation (Germany) grant. We are indebted to the participants of seminars at the University of Bonn, University of Minnesota, University of Bielefeld, and Central Economic Mathematical Institute (Moscow), for helpful suggestions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Annual report on the family income and expenditure survey (1987–1989), Statistics Bureau, Management and Coordination Agency, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cassels, J.W.S. (1981) Economics for mathematicians. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dougan W. R. (1982) Giffen Good and Law of Demand. J. Political Econ. 90, 8009–8015.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grandmont J.M. (1987) Distributions of preferences and the “law of demand”. Econometrica 55, 155–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gujarati, D.N. (1995) Basic econometrics. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hildenbrand, W. (1983) On the “law of demand”. Econometrica 51, 997–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hurwicz L., Jordan J., Kannai Y. (1987) On the demand generated by a smooth concavifiable preference ordering. J. Math. Econ. 16, 169–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kannai, Y. (1989) A characterization of monotone individual demand functions. J. Math. Econ. 18, 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mityuschin, L.G., Polterovich, V.M. (1978) Criteria for monotonicity of demand functions (in Russian), Ekonomiki i Mathematicheskii Metody bf 14, 122–128.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nachbar, J.H. (1998) The last word on Giffen goods ? Econ. Theory 11, 403–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pindyck R.S., Rubinfeld D.L. (1991) Econometric models and economic forecasts. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baruch, S., Kannai, Y. (2001). Inferior Goods, Giffen Goods, and Shochu. In: Debreu, G., Neuefeind, W., Trockel, W. (eds) Economics Essays. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04623-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04623-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07539-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-04623-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics