Abstract

The student who has chosen to study atmospheric physics will be familiar with the method of investigation used in physics: starting from experimental data, theories are formulated to explain them, and the same theories are extremely successful when they predict new effects. This, in some sense, is a vision a little bit too aseptic of the “method” in physics, because along with the acceptance of the different theories, also belong economic and political reasons and in general the attitude of the community with respect to the scientific research.

Keywords

Combustion Vortex Dioxide Dust Mercury 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gierasch, P., Goody, R. and P. Stone, 1970, The energy balance of planetary atmospheres, Geophys.Fluid Dyn., 1, 1Google Scholar
  2. Prinn, R.G. and B. Fegley, 1987, The atmospheres of Venus, Earth and Mars, critical comparison, Ann.Rev.Earth Planet.Sci., 15,171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Golitsyn, G.S., 1970, A similarity approach to the general circulation of planetary atmospheres, Icarus, 13, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Wallace, J.M. and P.V. Hobbs, 1977, Atmospheric Science: an introductory survey, Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  5. Leovy, C.B., 1976, Circulation in planetary atmospheres, unpublished manuscriptGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guido Visconti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of AquilaCoppito, L’ AquilaItaly

Personalised recommendations