Integration and Segregation in a Population — A Thermodynamicists’s View

  • Ingo Müller


A population of hawks and doves is considered, who individually behave differently in the contest for a resource, and both groups have two different contest strategies at their disposal. There is a strong analogy between such a population and a mixture of two constituents in two phases. Thus an integrated hawk-dove population corresponds to a homogeneous mixture of constituents and a segregated population corresponds to immiscible constituents. While in the mixture it is the value of the pressure that determines miscibility or immiscibility of the constituents, in the population integration or segregation is determined by the availability of the resource.


Phase Diagram Eutectic Point Flexible Strategy Expected Gain Walk Away 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Maynard-Smith, J. and Price, G. R. 1973. The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246, 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mimkes, J. 1995. Binary Alloys as a Model for the Multicultural Society. Journal of Thermal Analysis 43, 521–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Müller, I. 1998. Grundzüge der Thermodynamik. Springer, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Müller, I. 2000. On the Sociobiology of Hawks and Doves — a Phase Diagram for Integration and Segregation. J. Thermal Analysis 60, 1071–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Strafhn, P. D. 1993. Game theory and strategy. New Mathematical Library. The Math. Assoc, of America 36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ingo Müller
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Verfahrenstechnik, Fachgebiet Thermodynamik - HF 2Technische Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations