Skip to main content

The Inclusion of Stakeholder Perspectives in Integrated Assessment of Climate Change

  • Chapter
Interdisciplinarity in Technology Assessment

Part of the book series: Wissenschaftsethik und Technikfolgenbeurteilung ((ETHICSSCI,volume 11))

Abstract

Managing the risks of anthropogenic climate change is a societal process which has to deal with a long term complex issue under conditions of high and partly irreducible uncertainties and multiple value orientations of the many national and international stakeholders. Over the past decades Integrated Assessment (IA) has emerged as an approach to link knowledge and action in a way that is suitable to accommodate the uncertainties, complexities and value diversities of global environmental risks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berk MM, Hordijk L, Hisschemoller M, Kok MTJ, Liefferink D, Swart RJ, Tuinstra W (1999) Climate Options for the Long terni (COOL) Interim phase report. Dutch National Research Progràmme on Global Air Pollution and Climate Change, Report no. 410 2000 028

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahinden U, Querol C, Jäger J, Nilsson M (1999) Using computer models in participatory integrated assessment, ULYSSES Working Paper 99–2, Technical University of Darmstadt (http://www.zit.tu-darmstadt.de/ulysses/docmain.htm)

  • Douglas M, Wildaysky A (1982) Risk and Culture. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn WN (1997) Cognitive Impairment and Social Problem Solving: Some Tests for Type I II Errors in Policy Analysis. Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn WN (1998) Pragmatic Eliminative Induction: Proximal Range and Context Validation in Applied Social Experimentation. GSPIA working paper 001, Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of Pittsburgh (www.pitt.edu/ wpseries)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn WN (2000) Using the Method of Context Validation to Mitigate Type III errors in Environmental Policy Analysis. GSPIA working paper 016, Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of Pittsburgh (http://www.pitt.edu/ wpseries))

  • Dunn WN, Ginsberg A (1986) A sociocognitive approach to organizational analysis. Human Relations, Vol 39 /11, pp 955–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn WN, Pavlak TJ, Roberts G (1988) Cognitive Performance Appraisal: Mapping Managers’ Category Structures Using the Grid Technique, Personnel Management, Vol. 16 /3, pp 16–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1992) Three Types of Risk Assessment and the Emergence of Post-Normal Science. In: Krimsky S, Golding D (eds) Social Theories of Risk. Greenwood: Westport CT, pp 251–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1993) Science for the Post-Normal Age. Futures September 1993, pp 739–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz SO, Ravetz J (1996) Risk Management, post-normal science, and extended peer communities. In: Hood C and Jones DKC ( 1996 ) Accident and Design, Contemporary debates in Risk Management. UCL Press, pp 172–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn TF (1983) Boundary-work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review 48, pp 781–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hisschemoller M, Boer, J de, Breukels M, Dunn WN, Sluijs JP van der (2000) Climate risk assessment: evaluation of approaches. Working document 1, Depertment of Science Technology and Society, Utrecht University

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff S (1990) The Fifth Branch, Scientific Advisers as Policy Makers. Harvard University Press, Harvard

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW, Hohenemser C, Kasperson JX (eds) (1985) Perilous Progress: Managing the Hazards of Technology. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Raifa H (1968) Decision Analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravetz J, Funtowicz SO (1999) Post-Normal Science-an insight now maturing. Futures 31, pp 641–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans J, Dowlatabadi H (1997) Integrated Assessment Modelling. In: Rayner S, Malone EL (eds) Human Choice and Climate Change. Vol. 3. The Tools for Policy Analysis. Battle Press, Columbus, OH, pp 291–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans J, De Vries B (1997) Perspectives on Global Change, The TARGETS Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • The Social Learning Group (2001, in press). Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks: A Comparative History of Social Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion and Acid Rain. MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprinz D, Luterbacher U (1996) International Relations and Global Climate Change. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. Report No. 21

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth FL, Hizsnyik E (1998) Integrated environmental assessment methods: Evolu- tion and applications. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 3, pp 193–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Sluijs JP (1997) Anchoring amid uncertainty; On the management of uncertainties in risk assessment of anthropogenic climate change Ph. D. Thesis. Utrecht University, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Sluijs JP, Lourens P (2000) Climate risk assessment: evaluation of approaches. Working document, 2, Department of Science Technology, Utrecht University, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1996) The World Bank Participation Sourcebook, The World Bank, Washington. pp. 6, 13, 126

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van der Sluijs, J., Kloprogge, P. (2001). The Inclusion of Stakeholder Perspectives in Integrated Assessment of Climate Change. In: Decker, M., Wütscher, F. (eds) Interdisciplinarity in Technology Assessment. Wissenschaftsethik und Technikfolgenbeurteilung, vol 11. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04371-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04371-4_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07671-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-04371-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics