Advertisement

Industry Hegemony and Company Product Development Performance in the Personal Computer Industry

  • Helmut Drüke
Chapter

Abstract

Time-based competition in the personal computer (PC) industry has developed in a dramatic way. It is no longer enough to shorten the period from product inception to market presentation for new products. PC manufacturers have to be among the first to bring new computers using the latest logic chips onto the market. They can recover development costs only in the first three to four months after introducing a new generation of microprocessors, because as soon as cut-price competitors launch their PCs, market prices drop dramatically and profit margins on PCs dwindle everywhere. Since the product life-cycle is only six to eight months, there is scarcely time for the amortization of development costs.

Keywords

Personal Computer Product Development Print Circuit Board Process Participant Product Development Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Borrus, M. (1993): The Regional Architecture of Electronics. BRIE Working Paper 53.Google Scholar
  2. Bonus, M., Zysman, J. (1997): Wintelism and The Changing Terms of Global Competition: Prototype of the Future? BRIE Working Paper 96b.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, K. B., Fujimoto, T. (1991): Product Development Performance, Boston.Google Scholar
  4. Drüke, H. (1997): Kompetenz im Zeitwettbewerb. Politik und Strategien im Produktent-wicklungsprozeß. Berlin/Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eisenhardt, K. M., Tabrizi, B. N. (1995): Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40, pp. 84–110.Google Scholar
  6. Ernst, D., O’Connor, D. (1992): Competing in the Electronics Industry. The Experience of Newly Industrializing Economies. OECD Paris.Google Scholar
  7. Ferguson, Ch., Morris, Ch. R. (1993): Computer Wars. How the West can Win in a post-IBM World. Times-Books New York.Google Scholar
  8. Imai K., Nonaka, J., Takeuchi, H. (1985): Managing the New Product Development Process. How Japanese Companies Learn and Unlearn. In: K. B. Clark, R. H. Hayes, Chr. Lorenz (eds.): The Uneasy Alliance. Managing the Productivity-Technology Dilemma. Boston, pp. 337–375.Google Scholar
  9. Wright, R. W., Wright, L. C, Birnbaum-More, P. H. (1994): The Role of Coordination Routines in the Product Development Process: An Analysis of American and Japanese Practices. In: Arbetsvetenskapliga kolleglet i Göteborg (ed.): 2nd International Product Development Management Conference on New Approaches to Development and Engineering, Gothenburg, Sweden, May 30–31, 1994. Proceedings, pp. 665–679.Google Scholar
  10. Westney, E. D., Sakakibara, K.(1992): Comparative Study of the Training, Careers, and Organization of Engineers in the Computer Industry in Japan and the United States. MIT Boston.Google Scholar
  11. Yin, R. (1992): Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helmut Drüke

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations